Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Anopexia mucosa circular en el tratamiento de las hemorroides y del prolapso muc...
Journal Information
Vol. 76. Issue 2.
Pages 78-83 (August 2004)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 76. Issue 2.
Pages 78-83 (August 2004)
Full text access
Anopexia mucosa circular en el tratamiento de las hemorroides y del prolapso mucoso rectal: complicaciones y resultados
Circular mucosal anopexy in the treatment of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosa prolapse: Complications and results
Visits
11343
A. Luis Hidalgo-Grau1
Corresponding author
llhidalgo@csm.scs.es

Correspondencia: L.A. Hidalgo Grau. Servicio de Cirugía General. Hospital de Mataró. Ctra. de Cirera, s/n. 08304 Mataró. Barcelona. España.
, Adolfo Heredia-Budó, Francesc García-Cuyàs, Josep Maria Gubern-Nogués, Xavier Suñol-Sala
Servicio de Cirugía General. Hospital de Mataró. Mataró. Barcelona. España
This item has received
Article information
Resumen
Introducción

La anopexia mucosa circular (AMC) es una técnica de reciente descripción que intenta reducir el dolor postoperatorio en caso de intervención quirúrgica por hemorroides y/o prolapso mucoso rectal. El objetivo del presente estudio descriptivo es evaluar los resultados de nuestro grupo con la utilización de la AMC.

Pacientes y método

Hemos intervenido a 96 pacientes con AMC (61 varones y 35 mujeres) en 4 años: 22 casos de prolapso mucoso rectal y 74 de hemorroides (19 de grado II, 27 de grado III y 28 de grado IV). La AMC se realizó con el equipo PPH01TM (Ethicon Endosurgery) y en 63 casos a través de la unidad de cirugía mayor ambulatoria. Se valoraron prospectivamente el dolor postoperatorio, las complicaciones inmediatas y la eficacia de la técnica (seguimiento medio, 23,1 meses; rango, 6-49 meses).

Resultados

El 82% de los pacientes manifestó dolor por debajo de 2 en la escala analógica visual de dolor (0-10) a las 24 h. La urgencia defecatoria y el tenesmo rectal, ambos leves, han sido constantes en la primera semana y han desaparecido con posterioridad. Se produjeron 8 casos (8,3%) de incontinencia leve autolimitada en los primeros 3 meses, y 4 pacientes presentaron complicaciones hemorrágicas graves, de los que 3 precisaron reintervención y hemostasia de la línea de grapado y 1 presentó un hematoma perirrectal que se trató de manera conservadora. En el seguimiento, 74 pacientes se hallan asintomáticos (77,1%), en 17 (17,7%) ha disminuido la sintomatología de forma evidente y 5 pacientes han requerido reintervención por fracaso de la técnica.

Conclusiones

Hemos conseguido una eficacia notable en el tratamiento de las hemorroides y del prolapso mucoso rectal mediante la AMC, con un índice de complicaciones aceptable. El éxito de la AMC se basa en su implantación progresiva y la aplicación de una técnica quirúrgica cuidadosa. Su eficacia a largo plazo está pendiente de seguimientos más prolongados.

Palabras clave:
Hemorroides
Prolapso mucoso rectal
Anopexia mucosa circular
Introduction

Circular mucosal anopexy (CMA) is a new surgical procedure for decreasing postoperative pain after surgical interventions for hemorrhoids and/or rectal mucosa prolapse. The aim of the present descriptive study was to evaluate the results of the CMA technique in our group.

Patients and method

Ninety-six patients underwent the CMA procedure (61 men, 35 women) during a 4-year period: 22 patients had rectal mucosa prolapse and 74 had hemorrhoids (second degree in 19, third degree in 27, and fourth degree in 28). CMA was performed with a PPH01TM device (Ethicon Endosurgery). Sixty-three patients underwent day-case surgery. Postoperative pain, early complications and the efficacy of CMA were prospectively evaluated (mean follow- up: 23.1 months; range 6-49).

Results

Postoperative pain after 24 hours was less than 2 (visual analog scale of pain, 0-10) in 82% of patients. Low-intensity fecal urgency and tenesmus were present in the first week and subsequently disappeared. Eight patients (8.3%) complained of mild, self-limiting incontinence during the first 3 months after surgery. Four patients presented severe postoperative bleeding, of which three required reintervention and hemostasia of the staple line; one patient had a perirectal hematoma that was conservatively treated. In the follow-up, 74 patients (77.1%) were asymptomatic, 17 (17.7%) had notably decreased symptomatology and 5 patients required reoperation due to failure of the technique.

Conclusions

We have achieved notable efficacy in the treatment of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosa prolapse with CMA, with an acceptable rate of complications. The success of CMA is based on the progressive introduction and careful surgical application of the technique. Its long-term efficacy remains to be evaluated in studies with longer follow-up periods.

Key words:
Hemorrhoids
Rectal mucosa prolapse
Circular mucosal anopexy
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
E.T. Milligan, C.N. Morgan, L.E. Jones, R. Officer.
Surgical anatomy of the canal anal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids.
[2.]
A. Longo.
Monduzzi, (1998),
[3.]
W.H.F. Thompson.
The nature of haemorrhoids.
Br J Surg, 62 (1975), pp. 542-552
[4.]
A. Longo.
Stapled anopexy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy: two opposite concepts and procedures.
Dis Colon Rectum, 45 (2002), pp. 571-572
[5.]
J.V. Roig.
Anopexia grapada. ¿Un antes y un después en el tratamiento de las hemorroides prolapsadas?.
Cir Esp, 72 (2003), pp. 307-309
[6.]
B. Peng, D. Jayne, Y. Ho.
Randomised trial of Rubber-band ligation versus Stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing piles.
Dis Colon Rectum, 45 (2002), pp. A22
[7.]
E. Ganio, D.F. Altomare, F. Gabrielli, G. Milito, S. Canuti.
Prospective randomised multicenter trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy.
[8.]
R. Shalaby, A. Desoky.
Randomised clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.
Br J Surg, 88 (2001), pp. 1049-1053
[9.]
G.C. Beattie, M.A. Loudon.
Circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse.
Colorectal Dis, 2 (2000), pp. 170-175
[10.]
A. Herold, J. Kirsch, G. Staude, T. Hager, F. Raulf, J. Michel.
A German multicenter study on circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy.
[11.]
R.J. Guy, F. Seow-Choen.
Septic complications after treatment of haemorrhoids.
Br J Surg, 90 (2003), pp. 147-156
[12.]
M.J. Cheetam, N.J.M. Mortensen, P.O. Nystrom, M.A. Kamm, R. Phillips.
Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.
[13.]
H. Ortiz, Marzo, P. Armendariz.
Randomised clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.
Br J Surg, 89 (2002), pp. 1376-1381
[14.]
J. Escribano, E. Sánchez, R. Villeta, J.L. Druet, G. Guadalix, A. Prieto, et al.
Mucosectomía suprahemorroidal mediante sutura circular mecánica. Estudio prospectivo doble ciego frente a hemorroidectomia de Milligan y Morgan.
Cir Esp, 72 (2002), pp. 310-314
[15.]
Y.K. Ho, W.K. Cheong, C. Tsang.
Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: cost and effectiveness. Randomised, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.
Dis Colon Rectum, 43 (2000), pp. 1666-1675
[16.]
B. Ravo, A. Amato, V. Bianco, P. Boccasanta, C. Bottini, A. Carriero, et al.
Complication after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented?.
Tech Coloproctol, 6 (2002), pp. 83-88
[17.]
L.M. Sutherland, A.K. Burchard, K. Matsuda, J.L. Sweeney, E.L. Bokey, P.A. Childs, et al.
A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy.
Arch Surg, 137 (2002), pp. 1395-1406
[18.]
A. Maw, K-W. Eu, F. Seow-Choen.
Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy.
Dis Colon Rectum, 45 (2002), pp. 826-828
[19.]
F.H. Hetzer, N. Demartines, A.E. Handschin, P.A. Clavien.
Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy. Long term results of a prospective randomised trial.
Arch Surg, 137 (2002), pp. 337-340
[20.]
M.A. Singer, J.R. Cintron, J.W. Fleshman, V. Chaudhry, E.H. Birnbaum, T.E. Read, et al.
Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States.
Dis Colon Rectum, 45 (2002), pp. 360-367
[21.]
F.H. Hetzer, M. Schafer, M. Demartines, P.A. Clavien.
Prospective assessment of the learning curve and safety of stapler hemorrhoidectomy.
Swiss Surg, 8 (2002), pp. 31-36
[22.]
R.G. Molloy, D. Kingsmore.
Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.
[23.]
L.Y. Wong, J.K. Jiang, S.C. Chang, J.K. Lin.
Rectal perforation: a life-threatening complication of stapled hemorrhiodectomy: report of a case.
Dis Colon Rectum, 46 (2003), pp. 116-117
[24.]
M. Rowsell, M. Bello, D.M. Hemingway.
Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet, 355 (2000), pp. 779-781
[25.]
B.J. Mehigan, J.R.T. Monson, J.E. Hartley.
Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.
[26.]
K.H. Khalil, A. O’Bichere, D. Sellu.
Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy.
Br J Surg, 87 (2001), pp. 1352-1355
[27.]
P. Bocassanta, P.G. Capretti, M. Venturi, U. Cioffi, M. De Simone, E. Avesani, et al.
Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential versus conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced haemorrhoids and external mucosal prolapse.
Am J Surg, 182 (2001), pp. 64-68
[28.]
T. Pavlidis, B. Papaziogas, A. Souparis, A. Patsas, I. Koutelidakis, T. Papaziogas.
Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Int J Colorectal Dis, 17 (2002), pp. 50-53
[29.]
F. Gabrielli, M. Chiarelli, U. Cioffi, A. Guttadauro, M. De Simone, Mauro P. Di, et al.
Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolpase using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesia.
Dis Colon Rectum, 44 (2001), pp. 842-844
[30.]
M. Prats, A. Aldeano, L.A. Hidalgo, L.M. Badia, A. Heredia, J.M. Gubern.
Quality assesment in ambulatory surgery in a community hospital.
Am Surg, 6 (1998), pp. 153-156
[31.]
M.A. Martin López, G. Ollé Fortuny, L. Opisso Julià, F. Oferil Riera, L.A. Hidalgo Grau, M. Prats.
Correlation between the evolution of the substitution index and anaesthetic quality indicators in a day surgery programme.
Am Surg, 10 (2003), pp. 109-112
[32.]
B.K. Philip.
More ambulatory surgery: is it worth doing?.
Am Surg, 10 (2003), pp. 53
Copyright © 2004. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos