Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Treatment of acute intraoperative Budd-Chiari syndrome by placement of silicone ...
Journal Information
Vol. 100. Issue 7.
Pages 437-439 (July 2022)
Visits
277
Vol. 100. Issue 7.
Pages 437-439 (July 2022)
Innovation in surgical technique
Full text access
Treatment of acute intraoperative Budd-Chiari syndrome by placement of silicone prosthesis
Tratamiento del síndrome de Budd-Chiari agudo intraoperatorio mediante colocación de prótesis de silicona
Visits
277
Irene Mirón Fernández
Corresponding author
irenemironfernandez@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Belinda Sánchez Pérez, José Antonio Pérez Daga, Julio Santoyo Santoyo
Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo y Trasplantes, Complejo Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Additional material (1)
Abstract

Complete liver mobilization for major resections sometimes causes liver tilting due to the release of the suspensory elements of the liver. Rarely this may take to a liver abnormal position with acute obstruction to venous flow at the suprahepatic level (Budd-Chiari syndrome). To avoid this complication, techniques such as post-operative stent implantation have been described. The case of a patient who underwent a complete mobilization of the liver for resection of the inferior venous cava and a right renal tumor, was reported. After that, an acute Budd-Chiari Syndrome was observed caused of the liver malposition, which was solved with the placement of two silicone prostheses in the liver cell.

Keywords:
Liver
Malposition
Prosthesis
Resumen

La movilización hepática completa para resecciones mayores provoca, en ocasiones, basculación del hígado secundaria a la liberación de sus elementos suspensorios. Esto puede ocasionar una malposición hepática con obstrucción aguda al flujo venoso a nivel de las suprahepáticas (síndrome de Budd-Chiari). Para salvar esta complicación se han descrito técnicas como colocación de sondas de Foley, balón Sengstaken-Blakemore o implantación de endoprótesis vasculares en el postoperatorio. Aquí presentamos el caso de un paciente al que se le realizó una movilización completa para resección de un tumor renal derecho y resección de vena cava inferior por trombosis de ésta hasta entrada de las venas suprahepáticas. Durante el proceso se produjo un Budd-Chiari agudo por malposición del hígado que fue resuelto con la colocación de dos prótesis de silicona en la celda hepática.

Palabras clave:
Hígado
Malposición
Prótesis
Full Text
Introduction

The onset of acute or sub-acute Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) following liver surgery has been reported in .1% of cases1. Most developed after right liver resections or extended hepatectomies2–5. Cases have also been reported after use of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor in liver transplantation6. Hypertrophy or rotation of the remnant causes rotation or kinking at the outflow of the suprahepatic veins (SHV) or inferior vena cava (IVC). Treatment to date has been reintervention with fixation of the hepatic remnant to the falciform ligament, anterior wall, etc.2–5, the use of vascular stents6,7, placement of Sengstaken-Blakemore balloon,8–10 Foley catheters,11 or tissue expanders12,13. The onset of acute BCS has also been described in liver transplantation in the event of a mismatch between the size of the donor graft and the recipient’s hepatic fossa, solved by the placement of silicone implants14–16.

We present a case of BCS onset in a patient after complete hepatic mobilisation for excision of a right kidney tumour and complete resection of the inferior vena cava. It was treated by placing a silicone prosthesis.

Surgical technique

A 55-year-old male patient presenting with discomfort in the right renal fossa associated with constitutional syndrome with weight loss of 10 kg over the past two months and dyspnoea on minimal exertion. The CT scan showed a large left kidney mass (15 × 13 × 11 cm), destructuring the kidney, reaching the renal hilum with an image of thrombosis of the renal vein continuing with thrombosis of the inferior vena cava, thrombosis of the distal part of the left renal vein, and thrombosis up to the ileus femoris region (stage IIIB, according to the classification by Ciancio et al.17). The case was presented to the Oncology Committee and intervention on the renal mass with the collaboration of hepatobiliary surgeons and cardiovascular surgeons was decided. The Urology Department resected the renal mass alone, as it was impossible to remove the entire tumour en bloc. The surgical department released the right and left hepatic ligaments, dissected, ligated, and sectioned the retrohepatic veins to expose the IVC in its entirety, up to the SHV outflow. The suprahepatic IVC was dissected and surrounded by a vascular snare for control if necessary. Adequate hepatic and systemic drainage were confirmed by clamping below the outflow of the SHV. The cardiovascular surgeons excised the IVC up to the iliac bifurcation, after ligating the left renal vein. The length of the resected vein did not allow its reconstruction. On repositioning in the hepatic fossa, there was descent and cranial displacement of the liver due to the absence of the tumour and the resected thrombosed cava, which caused closure of the venous drainage of the SHV, leading to haemodynamic instability and hepatic congestion (bluish colour, increased volume, and consistency of the liver). The liver surgeons were notified of this, and, on examination, they assessed that the descent of the liver in the hepatic fossa was responsible for the unstable situation. Therefore, a silicone prosthesis was placed to elevate the liver; however, the cranial displacement of the liver towards the diaphragm maintained the difficulty of venous drainage of the liver and the unstable situation. It was decided to place a second prosthesis to keep it in position and prevent its displacement towards the diaphragm. This allowed adequate venous drainage, the liver congestion improved, and the instability disappeared. Neither flowmetry nor echo-Doppler was performed due to the lack of available equipment. During his stay in ICU the patient required haemodialysis for acute kidney failure and developed a pulmonary thromboembolism. The postoperative control CT scan showed correct position with both prostheses, good venous drainage, and adequate hepatic perfusion. Histology was clear cell carcinoma, World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grade 4, with extensive sarcomatoid areas (>50%) and inferior cava with lumen occupied by carcinoma and wall infiltration, and adrenal gland involvement (T4N0Mx).

Discussion

Onset of Budd-Chiari syndrome after liver surgery usually follows right liver resections or right trisectionectomies2–5. It is due to displacement of the liver remnant leading to kinking of the SHV or compression of the IVC, resulting in compromised hepatic venous drainage. It can also occur in liver transplant recipients when there is mismatch between donor graft size and recipient liver cell size. The most described treatment is reoperation and clamping of the liver to the hepatic ligaments, wall, or diaphragm2–5. Recent publications show therapeutic solutions using venous stents6,7, balloons that are subsequently removed postoperatively8–10, Foley catheters11 or tissue expanders12,13, most show good results.

We present a case of onset of intraoperative BCS after excision of a renal mass and thrombosed IVC secondary to hepatic malposition. The displacement into the hepatic and cranial fossa was not solvable with ligament or abdominal wall clamping. The placement of silicone prostheses has already been described in the literature by liver transplant groups when there is a mismatch between the size of the donor graft and the recipient's hepatic fossa14–16. It was performed in our Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Group14; the patient made good short and long-term postoperative progress, with a follow-up of more than 10 years, without complications related to the silicone prosthesis used. In other studies, follow-ups of up to 50 months have been described for silicone prostheses placed without any complications15.

This technical innovation is an additional resource to consider, especially in an intraoperative emergency with the onset of BCS that cannot be resolved with the usual support. The use of current silicone prostheses is safe, with a very low risk of infectious complications, rupture18, or leakage19 in the long term, according to the literature.

We conclude that the use of silicone prostheses in hepatic malposition secondary to complete mobilisation and resection of the inferior vena cava has proven effective in the management of secondary acute Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Funding

Not presented.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Urology, Anaesthetic and Radiodiagnostic Departments for their collaboration.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following is Supplementary data to this article:

(13.37MB)

References
[1]
Y. Shimahara, Y. Yamaoka.
Vascular complications in hepatobiliary surgery — pitfalls of surgery for advanced tumors.
Jpn Vasc Surg, 11 (2002), pp. 687-692
[2]
F.W. Sequeira, T.R. Weber, W.L. Smith, J.M. Careskey, M.S. Cairo.
Budd-Chiari syndrome caused by hepatic torsion.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 137 (1981), pp. 393-394
[3]
G. Alcaraz, M. Meineri, K. Dattilo, M. Wąsowicz.
Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of acute Budd-Chiari syndrome after extended right hepatectomy.
A Case Rep, 7 (2016), pp. 13-15
[4]
X.L. Bai, Y.W. Chen, Q. Zhang, L.Y. Ye, Y.L. Xu, L. Wang, et al.
Acute iatrogenic Budd-Chiari syndrome following hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a report of two cases.
World J Gastroenterol, 19 (2013), pp. 5763-5768
[5]
N. Sato, A. Kenjo, T. Tsuchiya, T. Anazawa, J. Haga, T. Sato, et al.
Remnant left lobe torsion causing hepatic venous outflow obstruction after hepatic right lobectomy for giant hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a case.
Fukushima J Med Sci, 60 (2014), pp. 170-174
[6]
X.L. Liu, F.Q. Li, X. Li, B. Li, L.N. Yan, Y.G. Wei.
Treatment of hepatic venous outflow stenosis after living donor liver transplantation by insertion of an expandable metallic stent.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 8 (2009), pp. 424-427
[7]
J.K. Wang, M.J. Truty, J.H. Donohue.
Remnant torsion causing Budd-Chiari syndrome after right hepatectomy.
J Gastrointest Surg, 14 (2010), pp. 910-912
[8]
A.L. Colón, L. Rodríguez-Bachiller, E. Velasco, B. Díaz-Zorita, D. Rincón, J.A. López-Baena, et al.
Sengstaken tube removal under direct hemodynamic monitoring after post transplantation venous occlusion.
Case Rep Surg, 2019 (2019),
[9]
K. Steinbrück, R.A. Fernandes Jr, M. Enne, J.M. da Silva Gomes Martinho, J.A. da Silva Alves, L.F. Pacheco-Moreira.
Ectopic placement of Sengstaken-Blakemore device to correct outflow obstruction in liver transplantation: case reports.
Transplant Proc, 42 (2010), pp. 597-598
[10]
B. Malassagne, B. Dousset, P.P. Massault, D. Devictor, O. Bernard, D. Houssin.
Intra-abdominal SengstakenBlakemore tube placement for acute venous outflow obstruction in reduced-size liver transplantation.
Br J Surg, 83 (1996), pp. 1086
[11]
M.A. Wahab, A. Shehta, H. Hamed, M. Elshobary, T. Salah, A.M. Sultan, et al.
Hepatic venous outflow obstruction after living donor liver transplantation managed with ectopic placement of a foley catheter: a case report.
Int J Surg Case Rep, 10 (2015), pp. 65-68
[12]
C.C. Wang, A.M. Concejero, C.C. Yong, Y.S. Chen, S.H. Wang, C.C. Lin, et al.
Improving hepatic and portal venous flows using tissue expander and Foley catheter in liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant, 20 (2006), pp. 81-84
[13]
Y. Inomata, K. Tanaka, H. Egawa, S. Uemoto, T. Kiuchi, K. Satomura, et al.
Application of a tissue expander for stabilizing graft position in living-related liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant, 11 (1997), pp. 56-59
[14]
S. Mera, J. Santoyo, M.A. Suárez, J.A. Bondía, A.J. Cabello, M. Jiménez, et al.
Use of the breast implant for liver graft malposition.
Liver Transpl Surg, 5 (1999), pp. 534-535
[15]
M. Gastaca, A. Valdivieso, P. Ruiz, J. Gonzalez, A. Ventoso, J.O. de Urbina.
Venous outflow obstruction after orthotopic liver transplantation: use of a breast implant to maintain graft position.
Clin Transplant, 25 (2011), pp. E320-E326
[16]
C. Lim, M. Osseis, A. Tudisco, E. Lahat, D. Sotirov, C. Salloum, et al.
Hepatic venous outflow obstruction after whole liver transplantation of large-for-size graft: versatile intra-operative management.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 22 (2018), pp. 321-325
[17]
G. Ciancio, A. Vaidya, M. Savoie, M. Soloway.
Management of renal cell carcinoma with level III thrombus in the inferior vena cava.
[18]
D. Maxwell, M. Estes, J.M. Walcott, J.W. Canady, T.D. Hunter, et al.
Safety and effectiveness of silicone gel-filled breast implants in primary augmentation patients.
Aesthet Surg J, 41 (2021), pp. NP329-NP335
[19]
S.M.W. Pool, R. Wolthuizen, C.M. Mouës-Vink.
Silicone breast prostheses: a cohort study of complaints, complications, and explantations between 2003 and 2015.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 71 (2018), pp. 1563-1569

Please cite this article as: Mirón Fernández I, Sánchez Pérez B, Pérez Daga JA, Santoyo Santoyo J. Tratamiento del síndrome de Budd-Chiari agudo intraoperatorio mediante colocación de prótesis de silicona. Cir Esp. 2022;100:437–439.

Copyright © 2021. AEC
Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.cireng.2022.07.019
No mostrar más