Buscar en
Allergologia et Immunopathologia
Toda la web
Inicio Allergologia et Immunopathologia Quality of life and clinical characterization of patients with vernal keratoconj...
Journal Information
Vol. 46. Issue 4.
Pages 370-377 (July - August 2018)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
99
Vol. 46. Issue 4.
Pages 370-377 (July - August 2018)
Original Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2017.12.002
Full text access
Quality of life and clinical characterization of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis in a pediatric population in Colombia
Visits
...
C.M. Gómez-Henaoa,b, C.I. Herrera-Moralesa,c, R. Ramírez-Giraldoa,d, R. Cardona-Villaa,b,
Corresponding author
rcv2016udea@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
a GACE Group Research Associate, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
b Clinical Allergist IPS Universitaria – Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
c Clinical Allergist, Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Colombia
d Pediatric Allergist, IPS Universitaria – Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (7)
Table 1. Contents KIDSCREEN-27 survey.
Table 2. General features and clinics.
Table 3. Family history and comorbidities.
Table 4. Skin tests for aeroallergens.
Table 5. Treatments.
Table 6. Quality of life.
Table 7. Quality of life in VKC compared with the Instrument Validation study KIDSCREEN-27.
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis is one of the most serious ocular allergies that have the potential to induce large ocular morbidity and significant visual changes affecting the quality of life of these individuals.

Methodology

This study was conducted in two phases. The first phase consisted of the clinical characterization of 32 patients from the Clinical Allergology center of the I.P.S. Universitaria from July 2014 to February 2015. A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed.

In the second phase, the evaluation of quality of life was conducted using the questionnaire KIDSCREEN 27, which was validated in our population and evaluated as recommended by the creators of this instrument.

Results

A total of 24 patients (75%) were men, mean age of 12.1 (SD 2.6) years. 100% of the patients had clinical evaluation and were monitored by Allergology and Ophthalmology, 12 patients (37.5%) were found in mild level, 5 patients (15.6%) were moderate and 14 patients (43.8%) were severe level. The most common symptoms were pruritus (75%), photophobia (50%), lacrimation (37.5%), and secretions (28.1%). 65.6% had a family history of atopy and 84.4% had an allergic comorbidity. Aeroallergen skin tests were found positive in 25 patients (78.1%). All patients had initiated ocular treatment by the time the survey of quality of life was conducted; but, they still had low quality of life scores in the 5 domains assessed. When the scores were evaluated by gender, the only statistically significant difference was found in the domain of family life and free time, which was lower for women.

Conclusion

The vernal keratoconjunctivitis is a disease more prevalent in men. It apparently has an important atopic base in our environment, which due to its severe ocular involvement causes a marked decrease in the quality of life of the children who present it.

Keywords:
Quality of life
Allergy
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
Pediatrics
Full Text
Introduction

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a chronic inflammatory bilateral external eye disease but in its early days can occur unilaterally, affecting mainly patients in the first and second decade of life.1,2 The predominant symptom is severe ocular itching, followed by marked photophobia, blepharospasm, mucus and foreign body sensation.3

It may involve only the palpebral area or only limbo area, but generally occurs in mixed form.4 The hallmark of palpebral VKC is papillary hyperplasia of the upper tarsal conjunctiva, papillae ranging from 1mm in diameter to giant papillae or typical stoned.4 In limbal VKC predominates the infiltration of limbal subconjunctival tissues forming nodules, sometimes accompanied by pannus, superficial neovascularization in cornea's periphery, making limbo's appearance thickened and opaque. They are often covered by white calcified excrescences known as Horner-Trantas nodules.5 The extension to the center of the cornea of limbal vegetations can affect vision,6 also it can be found irregular pigmentation of the bulbar conjunctiva exposed7; all these changes reflecting important ocular involvement of the disease affect the quality of life of patients.

Although some signs and symptoms of VKC may be similar to those of other ocular allergic diseases, the presence of limbo papillae and/or giant tarsal papillae can differentiate it from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis8 and the absence of eczema on eyelids can help to differentiate atopic keratoconjunctivitis.9

It is an often underdiagnosed disease. Although its prevalence varies widely by geographic area, it is considered a rare disease in temperate areas with endemic sites and a prevalence ranging between 4 and 5%10 is estimated. It has the potential to induce serious visual changes of 6–55% of patients, depending on the study population, due to complications of the cornea and unsupervised use of steroids.10 While appropriate assessment of the signs and symptoms of the disease is made with frequency, it is not enough to measure the impact it can have on the daily development of activities in these patients.

Allergic VKC and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) are the most severe forms of allergic eye disease. Knowing the impact that a disease has on the quality of life, it is important to improve the overall care of the individual, as it helps to evaluate the therapeutic measures and make decisions in health care. Yet, one of the main constraints in this regard are few studies at the time and the difficulty of finding an instrument that is validated to be applied in the target population.

Our study aims to conduct the clinical characterization and evaluate the quality of life of patients with a diagnosis of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, using a scale that is validated in our environment in patients who consulted a reference center of Clinical Allergology of the city of Medellin (Antioquia, Colombia) diagnosed with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed; this was carried out in two phases, in the first phase the clinical characterization of patients who came to the Service of Clinical Allergology of the I.P.S. Universitaria was conducted, in a time period from July 2014 to February 2015. A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed, where the following items were evaluated:

  • 1.

    Patients: Children (age 8–18 years, group for which the application of the instrument of quality of life is allowed) with a diagnosis of VKC. The diagnosis was based on clinical history, previously done by Clinical Allergology and Ophthalmology.

  • 2.

    Demographic and clinical data: These were taken from the medical records age, gender, place of residence, education, conjunctival papillary reaction, secretion, hyperemia, Trantas nodules, pseudogerontoxon, chemosis, symptoms to determine the activity of the disease at the time to evaluate the quality of life instrument (pruritus and/or photophobia associated with conjunctival hyperemia, discharge, visual disturbances or other clinical signs) and treatments performed.

  • 3.

    Clinical grades: symptom scale was scored using the proposal described by Bonini et al.11 Subsequently to facilitate statistical analysis, by our sample size, regrouped in mild patients who once Bonini et al. scale was applied, they were in grade 0 (quiescent) and grade 1 (mild intermittent); moderate to those who were in the 2nd grade (intermittent moderate) and grade 2b (moderate persistent) and severe individuals in grades 3 (severe) and 4 (very severe).

In the second phase the quality of life was assessed. After evaluation of medical records the questionnaire KIDSCREEN 2712,13 to the chosen patients was applied; upon request and approval of its use by the group “The KIDSCREEN Group Europe”. This is a questionnaire consisting of five domains, already validated in our population14; the questionnaire was applied and qualified as indicated in the instructions provided by the authors. The questions that were not answered were imputed with the average value of the items answered in the respective domain, as long as they had responded to 50% of that domain as recommended by the creators of this instrument (Table 1).

Table 1.

Contents KIDSCREEN-27 survey.

Domain  Theme questions 
Physical activity and health (PAH)PAH1 general health 
PAH2 fitness 
PAH3 physical activity 
PAH4 can run 
PAH5 feel energy 
Mood and feelings (MF)MF1 enjoy life 
MF2 humor 
MF3 fun 
MF4 feel sad 
MF5 feel bad 
MF6 feeling alone 
MF7 way of being 
Family life and free time (FLFT)FLFT 1 time for you 
FLFT 2 free time 
FLFT 3 time with parents 
FLFT 4 fair treatment 
FLFT 5 communication with parents 
FLFT 6 money to go out with friends 
FLFT 7 money for your expenses 
Social life (SL)SL1 time with friends 
SL2 fun with friends 
SL3 helping with friends 
SL4 trust friends 
School (S)S1 happy at school 
S2 go well at school 
S3 pay attention in school 
S4 getting along with teachers 

It was obtained the informed consent from all the patients and the ethics committee of the Universidad de Antioquia and the I.P.S. Universitaria, institutions where the study was conducted, approved the study.

Statistic analysis

Data were collected in a database in Excel 2013, designed for the study and subsequently exported to SPSS software version 18 for analysis. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analyze normality of variables. Those results with normal distribution are described by its mean and standard deviation (SD), for those who did not meet this criterion. The data are presented with median and interquartile range.

Categorical variables are presented as absolute frequencies and percentages. For analyzes, it was determined a confidence level of 95%, an alpha error of 5% and a statistical significance of p<0.05 was determined.

Results

A total of 56 medical records were found from July 2014 to February 2015 with a diagnosis of vernal keratoconjunctivitis; from these, 24 patients were excluded because of their age, difficulties with medical record in the diagnosis, or for inability to be reached to conduct the survey of quality of life KIDSCREEN 27; 32 patients met the inclusion criteria and were admitted to the study (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Inclusion and exclusion of patients.

(0.08MB).

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients: 24 patients (75%) were men, 79.1% residents in the metropolitan area, with an average age of 12.1 (SD 2.6) years, thirty-two (100%) children were in school, the average approved last year was 6.18 (SD: 2.4). 100% of patients had clinical evaluation and follow-up with Ophthalmology and Allergology, 1 patient with diagnosis made within 6 months, 3 between six months and one year and 28 more than a year. 12 patients (37.5%) were found to be mild grade, 5 patients (15.6%) were in a moderate grade, and 14 patients (43.8%) were in a severe grade (Table 2).

Table 2.

General features and clinics.

Gender: No. (%)
Female  8 (25%) 
Male  24 (75%) 
Age: M (SD)  12.1 (2.6) 
Scholarship: M (SD)  6.18 (2.4) 
Diagnostic time No. (%)
<6 months  1 (3.1%) 
6–12 months  3 (9.4%) 
>12 months  28 (87.5%) 
Gradesa
Mild  12 (37.5%) 
Moderate  5 (15.6%) 
Severe  14 (43.8%) 
No information  1 (3.1%) 
a

Grades: mild (quiescent+mild intermittent), moderate (intermittent moderate and persistent moderate) and severe (severe and very severe).

The most common symptoms reported by patients when they were in active phase of their disease were pruritus (75%), photophobia (50%), red eye (43.8%), lacrimation (37.5%), discharge (28.1%) and visual disturbances (9%) for a total of 27 symptomatic patients (87.2%); data from one of the patients (3.1%) could not be obtained.

Regarding to the family history of other allergic diseases, it was found that 21 patients (65.6%) reported a first-degree relative with allergic disease. There were no patients with history of a first-degree relative with vernal keratoconjunctivitis or Food Allergy; only one patient reported family history of atopic dermatitis, asthma 6 (18.8%) and the most frequent family history was rhinitis in 11 patients (34.4%) and some patients had various diseases in the family history. Comorbidities such as asthma, rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and food allergy were evaluated. 84.4% of the patients had rhinitis, 11 patients (34.4%) reported rhinitis as the only comorbidity; and, the remaining 50% reported rhinitis accompanied by some other comorbidity with the following distribution: asthma and rhinitis 9 patients (28.1%), rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and asthma 4 patients (12.5%), rhinitis and atopic dermatitis 2 patients (6.6%) and rhinitis and food allergy one patient (3, 3%). 5 patients (15.6%) do not have atopic diseases associated (Table 3).

Table 3.

Family history and comorbidities.

Family history No. (%)
Rhinitis  11 (34.4%) 
Asthma  6 (18.8%) 
Atopic dermatitis  1 (3.1%) 
Food allergy  0 (0%) 
VKC  0 (0%) 
Comorbidities No. (%)
Some comorbidity  27 (84.4%) 
Rhinitis  11 (34.4%) 
Asthma and rhinitis  9 (28.1%) 
Atopic dermatitis and rhinitis  2 (6.6%) 
Food allergy and rhinitis  1 (3.3%) 
Rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and asthma  4 (12.5%) 

Skin tests for aeroallergens: 30 patients (93.8%) have skin test report aeroallergens, positive in 25 (78.1%) and negative in 5 (15.6%) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Skin tests for aeroallergens.

Patients with skin test  30 (93.8%) 
Positive  25 (78.1%) 
Negative  5 (15.6%) 
Blomia tropicalis  11 (44%) 
Dermatophagoides farinae  21 (84%) 
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus  22 (88%) 
Cat Dander  4 (16%) 
Dog Dander  5 (20%) 
Mosquito  2 (8%) 
Cockroach  4 (16%) 
Ant  7 (28%) 
Pollen and grasses  3 (12%) 

Sensitization to dust mite 22 patients (88%), for epithelia 6 (24%), insects 9 (36%) and grass pollen and 3 (12%) was found.

All patients had initiated eye treatment at the time of conducting the survey of quality of life. Information was taken from previous medical record to determine the treatments used to this date. Cyclosporine ophthalmic was received by 14 patients (43.8%) and currently it is used by 15 (46.9%), Tacrolimus was used by 24 individuals (75%) and it continued to be used by 10 patients (31.3%), the Omalizumab was received by 4 patients (12.5%) and only one patient (3.1%) continued to receive it. Regarding the Immunotherapy, it was found that of 25 patients who were sensitized to an allergen, 12 subjects (43.8%) were using this therapeutic measure. Other treatments are detailed in Table 5.

Table 5.

Treatments.

Therapeutic measure No. (%)Current treatmentPrevious treatment
Yes  No  Yes  No 
Immunotherapy  14 (43.8)  18 (56.3)  16 (50)  16 (50) 
Tacrolimus  10 (31.3)  21 (65.6)  24 (75)  8 (25) 
Omalizumab  1 (3.1)  30 (93.8)  4 (12.5)  28 (87.5) 
Cyclosporine  14 (43.8)  17 (53.1)  15 (46.9)  17 (53.1) 
Antiallergics  30 (93.8)  1 (3.1)  32 (100)  0 (0) 
Lubricant  29 (90.6)  2 (6.3)  32 (100)  0 (0) 
Steroid  7 (21.9)  24 (75)  20 (62.5)  11 (34.4) 

Quality of life: In the 32 patients who were included in the study, quality of life was evaluated by conducting the questionnaire KIDSCREEN 27, 30 patients performed a self-filling out the survey and 2 patients were assisted in reading this. In some domains not all the answers were found and should impute these responses, as recommended by the authors of the scale procedure, these domains were: physical activity and health: In the question “Can run” one patient, domain and Family Life and Free time in the question “amount of money” for one patient and domain School in question “academic performance” two patients. The score by domains for quality of life was determined according to the instructions and equivalence values provided by the authors of the KIDSCREEN 27 group and after applying the score was: physical activity and health (PAH) 50.66 (40.5–59.4), the domain mood and feelings (MF) 50.44 (41.8–56), family life and free time (FLFT) 50.7 (44–53.3), social life (SL) 49.1 (39.9–57.8) and school (S) 53.3 (48.1–62.8). The estimation of each domain is also made by sex and this is shown in Table 6. Finding a lower score in all domains evaluated quality of life except in the Domain School, however this gender difference was only statistically significant for variable Family Life and Free Time.

Table 6.

Quality of life.

Domain evaluated  Physical activity and health  Mood and feelings  Family life and free time  Social life  School 
Total M(Q1–Q3)  50.66 (40.5–59.4)  50.44 (41.8–56)  50.7 (44–53.3)  49.1 (39.9–57.8)  53.3 (48.1–62.8) 
Female M(Q1–Q3)  45 (38.5–51.1)  46.5 (36.7–55.2)  46.8 (42–52.7)  43.8 (37.9–52.4)  53.3 (39.2–62.8) 
Male M(Q1–Q3)  52.6 (42.5–59.4)  51.8 (44.8–56)  52.1 (49.5–53.3)  50.9 (44.4–57.8)  53.2 (48.1–62.8) 
P value  0.07  0.22  0.04  0.06  0.98 

Results presented with M: median (Q1–Q3) interquartile range.

There was no statistically significant asocciation among quality life and evaluated parameters as sensitization status, specific allergen immunotherapy, allergic comorbidities and disease severity, but generally all the patients had a lower score of quallity of life in all domains.

Discussion

Our study is the first in Latin America to perform in a cohort of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis diagnosis the clinical characterization and measurement of quality of life with an instrument validated in children.

We found that in our series vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients are similar in demographic and clinical characteristics to those reported in the literature at local and global levels.8,15–21 VKC is more common in men, with a male: female ratio of 3:1.

Similar proportions (2.8:1 to 3.3:1) were reported by several authors,8,15,17,21 with the exception of the Ukponmwan study22 who found little difference between genders with a ratio 1.3:1.22 This remarkable difference between genders has suggested that hormonal factors probably play an important role in the development of this disease,23 hypothesis that has not yet been confirmed. Our patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis refer a high family history of atopic diseases, 65.6%, a finding that is in line with most series reporting frequency ranging from 48.7% to 57.7%,8,15,17,19,21 not reported by Fernandes et al.20; who remarkably found a lower frequency of family history of atopy20 as Leonardi et al. in an adult population,24 both finding a frequency of 28%.20,24 Comorbidity with other allergic diseases has been described with a high frequency15,19 except for Ukponmwan22 who found that only 5% of their patients had any of these diseases as personal history.22 Rhinitis was the most frequent comorbidity (84%) that was always present in subjects who showed some pathological personal history, followed by asthma (40.6%) and atopic dermatitis (18.8%). Trends confirmed in the literature.15,17,20 The presence of specific IgE measured by skin test is reported as important in our population,25 had already been described in VKC by Ramirez et al. (88%)15 and it is now reiterated by our study, 78%, numbers according to the reported in a cohort of Brazil by De Oliveira et al.,21 and in front of the two European courts, reported by Bonini et al. (57.8%),8 and Leonardi et al. (43.7%).17 Suggesting that perhaps there is greater sensitization to some allergen in the tropics or greater sensitization of these for be perennial.

The main symptom manifested by individuals affected by this disease is itching, followed by photophobia and secretions; these clinical symptoms were reported in all series as the most frequent.8,15,17,19–22

Treatments used in vernal keratoconjunctivitis subjects were generally similar to those used traditionally for this disease8,15,17; although, in our study we found using other molecules in moderate and severe cases, such as Tacrolimus and Omalizumab. Immunotherapy also appeared as a frequent alternative in patients sensitized to aeroallergens; treatment that was also described as effective therapeutic measure in our population affected by VKC by the group Experimental Clinical Allergology of the Universidad de Antioquia.26

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis is one of the most severe forms of ocular allergy, it is not uncommon to think that the quality of life of individuals who have this disease will be affected. It is believed that the measurements of the quality of life through scales may be useful to the health personnel, not only to understand the impact of the disease on the activities of daily living of individuals but also to determine the effect of treatments they use helping to take clinical decisions. This is the first study measuring quality of life in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis diagnosis conducted in Latin America, with a validated scale and in Medellin, Colombia. We use a generic questionnaire for quality of life because although Sacchetti et al.27 developed a questionnaire to measure quality of life in pediatric population diagnosed with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, it could not be used in our population because it was not even validated in our environment.

We found that the quality of life of children evaluated was compromised in the different domains assessed, this evaluated more objectively when compared even with the results obtained in the validation study of this scale in our city, scale that was validated in 321 children, 160 with disease and 161 healthy14 (between 8 and 18 years old, the same age range that our study), where scores are at lower levels for all areas against the population of the same healthy age, as detailed in Table 7. It can be further noted that the scores in most domains of individuals affected by VKC are even lower than those qualified by children with chronic illnesses, giving very similar results to the population of validation cohort questionnaire that was hospitalized14 (Table 7).

Table 7.

Quality of life in VKC compared with the Instrument Validation study KIDSCREEN-27.

  Physical activity and health (PAH)Mood and feelings (MF)Family life and free time (FLFT)Social life (SL)School (S)
  Children  Teenagers  Children  Teenagers  Children  Teenagers  Children  Teenagers  Children  Teenagers 
Healthya  80 (70–90)  70 (60–80)  86 (71–93)  82 (64–89)  86 (71–93)  82 (68–89)  88 (75–100)  88 (78–94)  88 (75–94)  78 (69–88) 
Ambulatorya  65 (50–70)  65 (55–75)  82 (71–86)  79 (68–86)  66 (61–75)  71 (61–82)  69 (50–88)  75 (56–88)  78 (69–88)  69 (56–81) 
Hospitalizeda  45 (35–60)  55 (40–68)  64 (54–75)  59 (48–79)  64 (54–79)  64 (54–66)  50 (19–88)  63 (50–81)  69 (44–88)  63 (22–78) 
Chronica  50 (45–65)  64 (55–75)  79 (68–86)  75 (68–86)  64 (57–71)  68 (57–82)  69 (50–88)  75 (63–94)  75 (63–88)  75 (63–88) 
VKCb  50.66 (40.5–59.4)50.44 (41.8–56)50.7 (44–53.3)49.1 (39.9–57.8)53.3 (48.1–62.8)
a

Validation data from questionnaire KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life related to in children and adolescents from Medellin, Colombia (14).

b

Data obtained in our study.

The same scale was used to evaluate the impact of immunotherapy in the quality of life of patients with rhinitis.28 Individuals diagnosed with rhinitis prior to performing immunotherapy had similar results in the various domains, except for the domain psychological wellbeing having a lower score in patients with rhinitis; these results suggest that as rhinitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis is a disease that has an important impact on the quality of life of patients.

We found a study of quality of life in adult patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, which concluded that decreased productivity and social activities was not considered a limiting factor.9 No association was found against the grade of disease and quality of life; only a trend is shown that could be explained by the size of the sample, which when divided by groups does not represent an adequate number for the analysis.

In our study, no statistically significant difference was found between the quality of life of patients and different clinical variables with which this was crossed as expected. The majority of patients for example, were in a severe grade of the disease (43.8%%), which involved comparing a robust endpoint to a few data, this maybe due to the size of the sample. This was reduced for several reasons that include the lack of specific questionnaires for the disease to allow cover a wider age population without having to leave out those under 8 years old, who represent an important group given the age of onset of the disease; the severity found in our population, hypotheses that speak of the need for more studies that permits subgroup analysis allowing greater approach to the individual needs of patients and making it possible to answer such questions.

Conclusion

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis in our population is a serious eye disease that has the same epidemiological characteristics already described in the literature; with significant comorbidity with other allergic diseases and sensitization clinically relevant to aeroallergens leading to think that apparently has an important atopic base, which by its potential severe eye complications, has a major impact on the quality of life of children who present it.

Funding

No external funding sources were used for carrying out this study.

Conflict of interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Ana Victoria Valencia Duarte. Teachers, Residents and Nursing Staff, Program Clinical Allergology. Universidad de Antioquia.

References
[1]
M.D. Khan, N. Kundi, N. Saed, A. Gulab, A.F. Nazeer.
A study of 530 cases of vernal conjunctivitis from the North West Frontier Province of Pakistan.
Pak J Ophthalmol, 2 (1986), pp. 111-114
[2]
B. Chenge, A. Makumyamviri, W.A. Kaimbo, D. Kaimbo.
Tropical endemic limbo-conjunctivitis in Lúbumbashi. Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol, 290 (2003), pp. 9-16
[3]
J. Jun, L. Bielory, M.B. Raizman.
Vernal conjunctivitis.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 28 (2008), pp. 59-82
vi
[4]
J.H. Sandford-Smith.
Vernal eye disease in Northern Nigeria.
Trop Geogr Med, 31 (1979), pp. 321-328
[5]
S. Bonini, M. Coassin, S. Aronni, A. Lambiase.
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
Eye (Lond), 18 (2004), pp. 345-351
[6]
J.S. Diallo.
Tropical endemic limboconjunctivitis.
Rev Int Trach Pathol Ocul Trop Subtrop, 53 (1976), pp. 71-80
[7]
S.K. Rao, S. Meenakshi, B. Srinivasan, S. Baluswamy.
Perilimbal bulbar conjunctival pigmentation in vernal conjunctivitis: prospective evaluation of a new clinical sign in an Indian population.
Cornea, 23 (2004), pp. 356-359
[8]
S. Bonini, S. Bonini, A. Lambiase, S. Marchi, P. Pasqualetti, O. Zuccaro, et al.
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis revisited: a case series of 195 patients with long-term followup.
Ophthalmology, 107 (2000), pp. 1157-1163
[9]
Y. Hu, Y. Matsumoto, M. Dogru, N. Okada, A. Igarashi, K. Fukagawa, et al.
The differences of tear function and ocular surface findings in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis and vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
[10]
S. De Smedt, G. Wildner, P. Kestelyn.
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis: an update.
Br J Ophthalmol, 97 (2013), pp. 9-14
[11]
S. Bonini, M. Sacchetti, F. Mantelli, A. Lambiase.
Clinical grading of vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 7 (2007), pp. 436-441
[12]
U. Ravens-Sieberer, A. Gosch, L. Rajmil, M. Erhart, J. Bruil, W. Duer, et al.
KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 5 (2005), pp. 353-364
[13]
The KIDSCREEN Group Europe.
The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires – quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Handbook.
Pabst Science Publishers, (2006),
[14]
C.A. Quintero, A.H. Lugo, H.I. García, A. Sánchez.
Validación del cuestionario KIDSCREEN-27 de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en niños y adolescentes de Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Colomb Psiquiat, 40 (2011), pp. 470-487
[15]
R.H. Ramírez, Z. Reina, Y. Espinoza, M.L. Soto, A. Hernández, R. Cardona.
Tacrolimus en queratoconjuntivitis vernal.
Pediátricas: Alergia, asma e inmunología, 21 (2012), pp. 5-12
[16]
R. Tesse, L. Spadavecchia, P. Fanelli, G. Rizzo, U. Procoli, L. Brunetti, et al.
Treatment of severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis with 1% topical cyclosporine in an Italian cohort of 197 children.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 21 (2010), pp. 330-335
[17]
A. Leonardi, F. Busca, L. Motterle, F. Cavarzeran, I.A. Fregona, M. Plebani, et al.
Case series of 406 vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients: a demographic and epidemiological study.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 84 (2006), pp. 406-410
[18]
S. De Smedt, J. Nkurikiye, Y. Fonteyne, A. Hogewoning, M. Van Esbroeck, D. De Bacquer, et al.
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis in school children in Rwanda and its association with socio-economic status: a population-based survey.
Am J Trop Med Hyg, 85 (2011), pp. 711-717
[19]
A. Leonardi, F. Piliego, A. Castegnaro, D. Lazzarini, A. La Gloria Valerio, P. Mattana, et al.
Allergic conjunctivitis: a cross-sectional study.
Clin Exp Allergy, 45 (2015), pp. 1118-1125
[20]
P. Fernandes Marback, D. De Freitas, A.J. Paranhos, R.J. Belfort.
Aspectos clínicos e epidemiológicos da conjuntivite alérgica em serviço de referência.
Arq Bras Oftalmol, 70 (2007), pp. 312-316
[21]
L.A. De Oliveira, M. Carvalho Malloz, D. Sole, D. De Freitas, L.B. De Sousa, M.J. Mannis.
Are cutaneous hypersensitivity tests to inhalant allergens a severity marker for vernal keratoconjunctivitis?.
Arq Bras Oftalmol, 70 (2007), pp. 991-995
[22]
C.U. Ukponmwan.
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis in Nigerians: 109 consecutive cases.
Trop Doct, 33 (2003), pp. 242-245
[23]
S. Bonini, A. Lambiase, M. Schiavone, M. Centofanti, L.A. Palma, S. Bonini.
Estrogen and progesterone receptors in vernal keratoconjunctivitis.
Ophthalmology, 102 (1995), pp. 1374-1390
[24]
A. Leonardi, D. Lazzarini, L. Motterle, M. Bortolotti, V. Deligianni, S.J. Curnow, et al.
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis-like disease in adults.
Am J Ophthalmol, 155 (2013), pp. 796-803
[25]
J. Sánchez-Caraballo, S. Diez-Zuluaga, R. Cardona-Villa.
Sensibilización a aeroalergenos en pacientes alérgicos de Medellín, Colombia.
Revista Alergia México, 59 (2012), pp. 139-147
[26]
E. López-Piedrahita, J. Sánchez-Caraballo, R.H. Ramírez-Giraldo, R. Cardona-Villa.
Efectividad de la inmunoterapia con alérgenos en pacientes con queratoconjuntivitis vernal.
Revista Alergia México, 60 (2013), pp. 11-16
[27]
M. Sacchetti, I. Baiardini, A. Lambiase, S. Aronni, O. Fassio, C. Gramiccioni, et al.
Development and testing of the quality of life in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis questionnaire.
Am J Ophthalmol, 144 (2007), pp. 557-563
[28]
J.J. Yepes-Nunez, C. Gómez, Y. Espinoza, R. Cardona.
The impact of subcutaneous immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus on the quality of life of patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.
Copyright © 2018. SEICAP
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos