Buscar en
Magister
Toda la web
Inicio Magister El estado de la cuestión sobre el estudio de la autoeficacia lectora en alumnad...
Información de la revista
Vol. 25. Núm. 1.
Páginas 51-59 (Enero 2013)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 25. Núm. 1.
Páginas 51-59 (Enero 2013)
Acceso a texto completo
El estado de la cuestión sobre el estudio de la autoeficacia lectora en alumnado con y sin dificultades de aprendizaje
State of Art in Reading Self-efficacy Research in Students with and without Learning Disabilities
Visitas
3258
Fátima Olivares, Raquel Fidalgo
Autor para correspondencia
rfidr@unileon.es

Autor para correspondencia.
Facultad de Educación, Universidad de León, León, España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen

Se analiza el estado de la cuestión sobre el estudio de la autoeficacia lectora, tanto desde un punto de vista evolutivo como comparativo, entre alumnos con y sin dificultades de aprendizaje (DA). Para ello, se realizó una búsqueda activa a través de las bases de datos electrónicas, desde el año 1980 hasta la actualidad; de los 29 artículos seleccionados en torno al ámbito de la autoeficacia en la lectura se analizaron 12 artículos centrados, bien en el nivel de autoeficacia lectora en el alumnado con y sin DA, bien en los cambios en la autoeficacia en función de la edad. La revisión de dichos estudios muestra resultados contradictorios, tanto en relación con las diferencias en el nivel de autoeficacia del alumnado con y sin DA como en los cambios en esta en función de la edad en población normalizada. Se discuten los resultados obtenidos, así como el análisis de limitaciones y lagunas de conocimiento en el ámbito de la autoeficacia lectora en alumnado con y sin DA. Se plantean futuras líneas de investigación que se pueden seguir, así como implicaciones en el ámbito práctico y educativo.

Palabras clave:
Autoeficacia
Comprensión lectora
Dificultades de aprendizaje
Abstract

This study analyzes the state of art in relation to the reading self-efficacy research, according to developmental and comparative perspective between students with and without learning disabilities. A bibliographic search was developed from 1980 to nowadays through electronic based of data. We found 29 papers focussed on reading self-efficacy research. 12 papers of them were focussed on analyzing reading self-efficacy in students with and without learning disabilities or studying changes in reading self-efficacy from a developmental point of view. The studies reviewed showed contradictory findings as in relation to differences in reading self-efficacy between students with and without learning disabilities as in relation to the changes in reading self-efficacy by age in normal-achievement students. Finally, we discuss findings and gaps of knowledge in reading self-efficacy research in students with and without learning disabilities, and we present future research lines and practice and educational implications.

Keywords:
Self-efficacy
Reading comprehension
Learning disabilities
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias
[Antoniou and Souvignier, 2007]
F. Antoniou, E. Souvignier.
Strategy instruction in Reading Comprehensión: An Intervention Study for Students with Learning Disabilities.
Learning Disabilities A Contemporary Journal, 5 (2007), pp. 41-57
[Bandura, 1977]
A. Bandura.
Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Psychological Review, 84 (1977), pp. 191-215
[Bandura, 2006]
A. Bandura.
Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.
Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, pp. 307-337
[Casteel et al., 2000]
C.P. Casteel, B.A. Isom, K.F. Jordan.
Creating confident and competent readers.
Intervention in school and Clinic, 36 (2000), pp. 67-74
[Chan, 1996]
L.K.S. Chan.
Combined strategy and attributional training for seventh grade average and poors readers.
Journal of Research in Reading, 19 (1996), pp. 111-127
[Chan, 1991]
L.K.S. Chan.
Promoting strategy generalization throught self-instructional training in students with reading disabilities.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, (1991), pp. 24
[Gersten et al., 2001]
R. Gersten, S.L. Fuchs, P.J. Williams, S. Baker.
Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research.
Review of Educational Research, 71 (2001), pp. 279-320
[Graham and Harris, 1989]
S. Graham, K.R. Harris.
Improving learning disabled students’ skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy training.
Exceptional Children, 56 (1989), pp. 201-214
[Guthrie et al., 2006]
J.T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, N.M. Humenick, K.C. Perencevich, A. Taboada, P. Barbosa.
Influences of Stimulating Tasks on Reading Motivation and Comprehensión.
The Journal of Educational Research, 99 (2006), pp. 232-246
[Guthrie et al., 1999]
J.T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, J.L. Metsala, K.E. Cox.
Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 3 (1999), pp. 231-256
[Henk and Melnick, 1995]
W. Henk, S. Melnick.
The reader self-perception scale (RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children fee about themselves as readers.
The Reading Teacher, 48 (1995), pp. 470-482
[Kelley. and Decker, 2009]
J. Kelley, E.O. Decker.
The current state of motivation to read among middle school students.
Reading Psychology, 30 (2009), pp. 466-485
[Lau, 2006]
K. Lau.
Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers a think-aloud study.
Journal of Research in Reading, 29 (2006), pp. 383-389
[Lau, 2009a]
K. Lau.
Grade differences in reading motivation among Hong Kong primary and secondary students.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79 (2009), pp. 713-733
[Lau, 2009b]
K. Lau.
Reading motivation, perceptions of reading instruction and reading amount: a comparison of junior and senior secondary students in Hong Kong.
Journal of Research in Reading, 32 (2009), pp. 366-382
[Lau and Chan, 2003]
K. Lau, D.W. Chan.
Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong.
Journal of Research in Reading, 26 (2003), pp. 177-190
[Mucherah and Yoder, 2008]
W. Mucherah, A. Yoder.
Motivation for Reading and middle school students’ performance on standardized testing in reading.
Reading Psychology, 29 (2008), pp. 214-235
[Nelson and Manset-Williamson, 2006]
J.N. Nelson, G. Manset-Williamson.
The impact of explicit, self-regulatory reading comprehension strategy instruction on the reading-specific self-efficacy, attributions, and affect of students with reading disabilities.
Learning Disability Quarterly, 29 (2006), pp. 213-230
[Pintrich and De Groot, 1990]
P.R. Pintrich, E. De Groot.
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1990), pp. 33-40
[Pintrich and García, 1991]
P.R. Pintrich, T. García.
Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom.
Advances in motivation and achievement, pp. 371-402
[Pintrich and Schunk, 2002]
P.R. Pintrich, D.H. Schunk.
Motivation in education: Theory, research, and Applications.
2.a, Merrill-Prentice Hall, (2002),
[Pintrich et al., 1994]
P.R. Pintrich, E.M. Anderman, C.H. Koblucar.
Intra individual Differences in Motivation and Cognition in students with and without Learning Disabilities.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27 (1994), pp. 360-370
[Pitcher et al., 2007]
S.M. Pitcher, L.K. Albright, C.J. DeLaney, N.T. Walker, K. Seunarie nesingh, S. Mogge, et al.
Assessing adolescents’ motivation to read.
Journal of Adolescente Adult Literacy, 50 (2007), pp. 378-396
[Sawyer et al., 1992]
R. Sawyer, S. Graham, K.R. Harris.
Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on learning disabled students’ compositions and self-efficacy.
Journal of Educational Psycho logy, 84 (1992), pp. 340-352
[Schunk and Rice, 1987]
D.H. Schunk, J.M. Rice.
Enhancing comprehension skill and self-efficacy with strategy value information.
Journal of Reading Behaviour, 19 (1987), pp. 285-302
[Schunk and Zimmerman, 1997]
D.H. Schunk, B.J. Zimmerman.
Social origins of selfregulatory competence.
Educational Psychologist, 32 (1997), pp. 195-208
[Sideridis, 2005]
G.D. Sideridis.
Attitudes and motivation of poor and good spellers: Broadening planned behavior theory.
Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21 (2005), pp. 87-103
[Souvignier, 2003]
E. Souvignier.
Instruktion bei Lernschwierigkeiten.
Diagnose: Sonder paedagogischer Foerderbedarf, pp. 402-415
[Swanson, 1999]
H.L. Swanson.
Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32 (1999), pp. 504-532
[Tabassam and Grainger, 2002]
W. Tabassam, J. Grainger.
Self-concept, attributional style and self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Learning Disability Quartetly, 25 (2002), pp. 141-151
[Taboada et al., 2009]
A. Taboada, S.M. Tonks, A. Wigfield, J. Guthrie.
Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension.
New York: Springer Science + Business Media, (2009),
[Usher and Pajares, 2005]
E.L. Usher, F. Pajares.
Sources of academic and selfregulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31 (2005), pp. 125-141
[Wigfield et al., 2004]
A. Wigfield, J.T. Guthrie, S. Tonks, K.C. Perencevich.
Children's motivation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences.
Journal of Educational Research, 97 (2004), pp. 299-309
[Wigfield and Guthrie, 1997]
A. Wigfield, J.T. Guthrie.
Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (1997), pp. 420-432
Copyright © 2013. Universidad de Oviedo
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas