The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
Indexed in:
MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine); Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), CINAHL, CSA-Cambridge Scientific Abstracts.
See moreFollow us:
The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years.
© Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2022
SRJ is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and qualitative measure of the journal's impact.
See moreSNIP measures contextual citation impact by wighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.
See more- •
MSK pain in children and adolescents is highly prevalent, yet instruments are scarce to measure MSK pain outcomes in children.
- •
The Pediatric MSK Pain Impact summary score is a short and easy instrument to assess MSK pain impact in school-aged children (aged 9 to 12) with MSK pain.
- •
The result of internal consistency was limited, and the construct validity showed borderline estimates of adequacy. However, the discriminative validity results showed that the instrument differentiates between children with frequent and infrequent MSK pain.
- •
This is a factor analysis of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the WAI questionnaire.
- •
The various WAI versions, completed online, have adequate measurement properties.
- •
The general construct validity of work ability can be evaluated using shorter versions of the WAI.
- •
The WAI is a good questionnaire to evaluate the work ability of Brazilian workers.
- •
There are 1779 physical activity trials in the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro).
- •
The mean (SD) PEDro score was 5.3 (1.5) points out of 10, reflecting ‘fair to poor’ quality.
- •
Journal impact factor is weakly correlated with trial quality (0.21, p < 0.001).
- •
We make five recommendations to improve future trial quality.
- •
Varied interventions were reported for LHBT tendinopathy.
- •
Modalities dominate studies while literature reviews stress multimodal care.
- •
Evidence gaps persist in the conservative management of LHBT tendinopathy.
- •
MRP values increased with increasing age.
- •
MEP values, both for girls and boys, were higher than the MIP values for all ages.
- •
Boys had higher MIP and MEP values than girls, regardless of age group.
- •
Large 95% CI values were observed for MIP and MEP, mainly for the 12–19 age group.
- •
For clinical practice, the nationality of the study should be considered.
- Home
- All contents
- Publish your article
- About the journal
- Metrics