Eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis from Finland

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00057-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) was recognized among Finnish cattle in 1966. Administrative decisions specifying and refining official control measures were given in 1966, 1976, 1980, and 1993. The measures’ key principle always has been ‘test and slaughter’. The EBL/bovine leukosis virus (BLV) infection situation was monitored at meat inspection, and hematologically between 1970 and 1977 and serologically between 1978 and 1989. Annual surveys including all dairy herds and samples from beef animals were conducted in 1990–2001. Bulk-tank milk samples represented the dairy herds in the surveys; the beef animals were sampled individually at slaughter. The maximum positive herd-level percentage in the surveys was 0.03%. EBL/BLV infection was evenly dispersed in the southern part of the country and nonexistent in the northern part. We conclude that herd-level prevalence of EBL/BLV infection never exceeded 5%. It nevertheless took 30 years to eradicate the disease and the infection. EBL was eradicated from mainland Finland in 1996 and from the island district of Ahvenanmaa in 1999. Annual monitoring of the EBL situation continues.

Introduction

Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL, Office International des Epizooties (OIE) B108) is a viral disease of adult cattle, characterized either by persistent lymphocytosis (PL) or lymphosarcoma formation (LSA), or both. Animals with PL frequently show no clinical signs; those with LSA have symptoms which reflect the site of the tumor. Cattle with LSA almost invariably die either suddenly or weeks or months after the onset of clinical signs. There is a genetic predisposition to both PL and LSA which occur independently but often coincidentally (Ferrer, 1979). The epidemiological cause of the disease is bovine leukosis virus (BLV), a deltaretrovirus in the Retroviridae family, but other factors contribute to development of the condition (Burny et al., 1980).

Iatrogenic infection through blood-contaminated needles and surgical instruments is probably the major route of transmission in most settings. Field transmission of BLV requires direct prolonged contact between animals or an exchange of blood, exudates, or tissues (e.g. during parturition). Spread of BLV between herds can occur via infected animals. Vertical transmission, semen, or hematophagous insects probably account for only a small proportion of cases (Hopkins and DiGiacomo, 1997). Transmission is thought to be cell (lymphocyte)-associated because BLV-infected cattle do not produce important amounts of cell-free virus in tissues, secretions, or excretions.

EBL occurs worldwide in cattle-raising countries. In most of these countries, EBL is a notifiable disease, and official control measures include screening or monitoring, precautions at borders, control of movement inside the country, and stamping out (OIE, 2000a). No vaccine is available for BLV (OIE, 2000b)—and indeed, vaccination against it is prohibited in many countries. Although susceptible to the infection, the role of sheep and goats as reservoirs of the virus is unclear.

It is not known when BLV infection or EBL entered Finland. Berger and Henriksson (1966) were the first to acknowledge the existence of the disease and the need for control measures against it. Between 1966 and 1996, its prevalence and geographic distribution were investigated, an official control program was set up and the infection successfully was eradicated from Finnish cattle. Our purpose is to review the measures applied and the eradication process.

Section snippets

Finnish legislation concerning EBL

The first government decision concerning the control of EBL was given in 1966 (242/66). This decision outlined the hematologic screening of herds based on leukocyte counts (Bendixen, 1965). The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) issued a circular in 1976 (168/76) replacing 242/66. Serologic testing for antibodies was introduced with MAF circular 173/1979. This circular was replaced in 1980 (183). The present circular was issued in 1993 (2/93); it contains a program (part 8) for

Hematologic and serologic methods to detect EBL

The hematologic method consisted of counting the leukocytes of a blood sample in a counting chamber and applying the classification key of Bendixen (1965) to the results. Antibodies against BLV first can be detected 3–16 weeks after infection. The antibodies most readily detected are those directed toward the gp51 and p24 proteins of the virus (OIE, 2000b). The predominant method used in Finland prior to 1990 was agar-gel immunodiffusion (AGID), but the actual sensitivity (Se) and specificity

Estimates of EBL prevalence prior to 1990

The prevalence of BLV infection or EBL among Finnish cattle between 1968 and 1989 only can be estimated because no cross-sectional studies with random sampling were performed during that period. The estimate can be based on two sources of information: statistics for frequency of leukosis in adult cattle (>2 years old) at meat inspection (1968–1978) (Neuvonen et al., 1980), and the annual hematological (1970–1977) and the serological (1978–1989) statistics of the National Veterinary Institute.

Surveillance results, 1990–2001

Surveillance from 1990 on was based on annual bulk-tank milk samples from dairy herds and from 1993 on, also on serum samples from beef animals. In 1990, approximately one-fourth of the dairy herds was included in the surveillance; from 1991 onward, every dairy herd was sampled. Three new BLV-infected herds were detected in 1990 (Table 3) in addition to the one still positive in 1989. The beef animals were sampled randomly at slaughter, but no information is available of the numbers of herds

Discussion

The surveillance results, especially from 1991 onward, are considered to describe the BLV infection situation more reliably than the follow-up data of the previous decades. However, the follow-up in 1989 corresponds reasonably with the surveillance in 1991, making the follow-up data more credible. Considering the data as an entity, it appears safe to conclude that in Finland, the herd-level prevalence of BLV infection or EBL has never exceeded 5%—a low figure which compares favorably with the

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text