Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 17, Issue 4, April 2010, Pages 565-568
Epilepsy & Behavior

Case Report
Verapamil attenuates the malignant treatment course in recurrent status epilepticus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.01.166Get rights and content

Abstract

In the scenario of refractory status epilepticus, the recommended approach of intensive care treatment is limited with respect to the available pharmacodynamic variability and its impeding, severe side effects. Alternative treatment options are therefore urgently needed. In the case described, a patient with nonlesional frontal lobe epilepsy had a high-frequency series of tonic seizures, which evolved into a malignant form of status epilepticus. Co-administration of verapamil, a potent multidrug transporter inhibitor, was followed by significant reduction in seizure frequency. We discuss the putative role of verapamil and the specific risk factors for this malignant treatment course.

Introduction

Status epilepticus (SE) remains refractory to first- or second-line drug treatment in 31 to 50% of cases [1]. In such cases, urgent treatment with anticonvulsant anesthetics, such as midazolam, propofol, and barbiturates, is recommended [1], but unfortunately is associated with severe adverse effects, such as respiratory depression, arterial hypotension, and immunosuppression [2]. Thus, longer hospitalization and poor functional outcome can become consequences of this aggressive, but possibly lifesaving, treatment approach.

The therapy for refractory SE is hampered by the limited pharmacodynamic variability of the currently recommended anesthetic anticonvulsants: midazolam, propofol, and the barbiturates act predominantly via γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition [3]. The efficacy of this GABAergic treatment modality, however, decreases the longer SE lasts [4], so that anesthetic anticonvulsants can fail to terminate refractory SE. An available alternative, the glutamatergic-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine, is restricted in view of only anecdotal promising reports [5] and its limited clinical applicability [4]. Consequently, other therapeutic strategies have been used in an attempt to treat SE: either addition of non-GABAergic drugs, such as topimarate [4] and levetiracetam [1], or use of nonpharmaceutical techniques, such as brain stimulation, hypothermia, and resective surgery [1].

Experimental data increasingly suggest that multidrug transporters (MDTs) play a role in the pathogenesis of pharmacoresistance in epilepsy [6], [7] by returning exogenous substances, such as antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), to the blood vessels at the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Verapamil unselectively inhibits the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter, which is a widespread MDT for several AEDs (see Table 1) [7], [8], [9]. Verapamil, therefore, is a potential candidate for adjunctive treatment in refractory SE.

In comparison to incident SE, recurrent SE is usually less likely to become refractory and is associated with a better outcome [10]. There are only a few reports of refractory SE that does not respond to anesthetic anticonvulsant drug therapy. In this subgroup, a recent study identified acute encephalitis as a sole independent risk factor, and previous diagnosis of epilepsy was rare [5].

The following case report illustrates the malignant treatment course of recurrent SE in a patient with nonlesional, pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Adjunctive treatment with verapamil was initiated and partial reduction in seizure frequency was observed within a short observation period.

Section snippets

Case report

A 20-year-old, right-handed woman was referred to our epilepsy center because of acceleration of her habitual series of bilateral tonic seizures. Treatment comprised valproic acid (VPA) 900 mg/day and lamotrigine (LTG) 150 mg/day. Two weeks before admission a small, pruritic, maculopapular rash on the dorsum of the feet and hands, which was responsive to local steroid application, was noted. Because of a possible adverse skin reaction, LTG was replaced by levetiracetam 3000 mg/day.

Since onset of

Discussion

We have described the malignant treatment course of recurrent SE in a patient with long-lasting pharmacoresistant, cryptogenic (frontal lobe) epilepsy. Replacing LTG with LEV may have caused the exacerbation of serial tonic seizures and subsequent development of SE. Support for this view derives from the fact that the previous episode of SE resulted from a change in AED treatment and from the lack of other causative and provoking factors such as infectious disease and nonadherence. Well-known

Conflict of interest statement

None of the author carries any financial interests in this publication (disclosure of financial interest) and no funding source supported this work.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Frank Oltmanns, Neuropsychological Department of the Epilepsy Center Berlin–Brandenburg, for his helpful statistical advice.

References (25)

  • D.S. Miller et al.

    Modulation of P-glycoprotein at the blood–brain barrier: opportunities to improve central nervous system pharmacotherapy

    Pharmacol Rev

    (2008)
  • A. Rossetti et al.

    Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis

    Arch Neurol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Drug repositioning

      2016, International Journal of Epilepsy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In class III AADs, Amiodarone inhibited PTZ – and caffeine-induced convulsions in mice.32 In class IV AADs, Verapamil protected mice against PTZ-induced seizures and inhibited epileptogenesis in amygdala-kindled rats33,34 and was found to be effective in the treatment of recurrent status epilepticus in human.35–37 Repositioning is going to gain much more importance in future as it can act as filler for ailing drug companies which are facing patent problems.

    • A pilot double-blind trial using verapamil as adjuvant therapy for refractory seizures

      2014, Epilepsy Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, verapamil inhibits cytochrome p450 (CYP450), which may increase serum AEDs concentrations, and consequently the efficacy and/or toxicity, of drugs such as carbamazepine (Macphee et al., 1986; Summers et al., 2004). In non-controlled open label studies and case reports, verapamil has been reported as a potential antiepileptic adjunctive therapy for (i) isolated patients in status epilepticus (Summers et al., 2004; Iannetti et al., 2005; Pirker and Baumgartner, 2011; Schmitt et al., 2010); (ii) patients with severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI) (Iannetti et al., 2009; Wical and Wandorf, 2013), and (iii) patients with focal onset seizures, particularly those with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) (Asadi-Pooya et al., 2013). However, presently there still have not been any placebo controlled clinical trials conducted to support verapamil's efficacy as an adjuvant antiepileptic treatment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text