Elsevier

Waste Management

Volume 38, April 2015, Pages 185-193
Waste Management

Development of a sintering process for recycling oil shale fly ash and municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash into glass ceramic composite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.028Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Glass ceramic composite is prepared from oil shale fly ash and MSWI bottom ash.

  • A novel method for the production of glass ceramic composite is presented.

  • It provides simple route and lower energy consumption in terms of recycling waste.

  • The vitrified slag can promote the sintering densification process of glass ceramic.

  • The performances of products decrease with the increase of oil shale fly ash content.

Abstract

Oil shale fly ash and municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash are industrial and municipal by-products that require further treatment before disposal to avoid polluting the environment. In the study, they were mixed and vitrified into the slag by the melt-quench process. The obtained vitrified slag was then mixed with various percentages of oil shale fly ash and converted into glass ceramic composites by the subsequent sintering process. Differential thermal analysis was used to study the thermal characteristics and determine the sintering temperatures. X-ray diffraction analysis was used to analyze the crystalline phase compositions. Sintering shrinkage, weight loss on ignition, density and compressive strength were tested to determine the optimum preparation condition and study the co-sintering mechanism of vitrified amorphous slag and oil shale fly ash. The results showed the product performances increased with the increase of sintering temperatures and the proportion of vitrified slag to oil shale fly ash. Glass ceramic composite (vitrified slag content of 80%, oil shale fly ash content of 20%, sintering temperature of 1000 °C and sintering time of 2 h) showed the properties of density of 1.92 ± 0.05 g/cm3, weight loss on ignition of 6.14 ± 0.18%, sintering shrinkage of 22.06 ± 0.6% and compressive strength of 67 ± 14 MPa. The results indicated that it was a comparable waste-based material compared to previous researches. In particular, the energy consumption in the production process was reduced compared to conventional vitrification and sintering method. Chemical resistance and heavy metals leaching results of glass ceramic composites further confirmed the possibility of its engineering applications.

Introduction

As one of the most important crude oil substitute resources, oil shale has been widely used to produce liquid shale oil due to the increase in the price of crude oil (Guo et al., 2014a, Jiang et al., 2007, Reinik et al., 2011). It is reported that shale oil (calculated based on the in situ oil shale) accounted for about 400 billion tons of oil that is higher than worldwide total for traditional crude oil (about 300 billion tons) (Han et al., 2014, Qian et al., 2008). However, the resulting oil shale fly ash (OSFA) is considered environmentally hazardous due to high alkalinity and heavy metals concentrations (e.g. Cr, Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu) (Blinova et al., 2012, Reinik et al., 2011). In order to reduce the hazards of oil shale fly ash and achieve its resource utilization, the production of glass ceramics was studied in our previous study (Luan et al., 2010) and the results showed that it would be suitable raw material to synthesize glass ceramics by adding analytic reagent calcium oxides. Due to unbalance components in some solid wastes, in practice, the supplementing of some oxides or natural resources was necessary measurement to obtain desired crystals and good performances (Kang and Kang, 2012, Wang et al., 2010, Wu et al., 2013). From the viewpoint of natural resources conservation and maximal (100%) waste utilization, a cost-effective method involving the cheaper raw materials and economical process will be more popular for the recycling of large scale wastes. Therefore, the production of glass ceramic composites by utilizing various wastes with complementary components seems to be an attractive strategy. On the other hand, increasing incineration plants in China exhaust large quantities of wastes in the form of bottom ash (BA), leading to disposal, economical, and environmental problems. The generated volume of bottom ash usually ranged between 10% and 12% of the initial volume of the wastes and weight between 20% and 35% of the initial wastes (Andreola et al., 2008, Barbieri et al., 2002, Monteiro et al., 2008). It is also identified as a hazardous waste due to the release of hazardous heavy metals and chlorides into the environment. Municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash generally contains high level of calcium content because the calcium hydroxide is injected into the waste gas stream to neutralize acid gas. Based on the analysis above, the comprehensive utilization of oil shale fly ash with high silica content and bottom ash with high calcium oxide content might be an attractive strategy to synthesize glass ceramics in which silica and calcium oxide are glass network former and modifier.

Glass ceramics as a kind of promising material have attracted much attention due to a variety of unique properties. Recent years, the conversion of wastes into glass ceramics has gradually become an important method to improve the recycling of hazardous inorganic wastes into value-added materials while simultaneously reducing the leaching concentrations of heavy metals. Various hazardous industrial (Erol et al., 2008, Kavouras et al., 2007, Zhao et al., 2012) and municipal wastes (Andreola et al., 2008, Cheng et al., 2011, Cyr et al., 2012, Yang et al., 2008) have been reported to synthesize glass ceramic materials by devitrifying a glass by single or two-stage heat treatment. Among these methods, the high-temperature melting as one of the most widely used methods could greatly reduce the volume of wastes and stabilize the heavy metals into the glass matrix, but the process (1400–1600 °C) is general energy-intensive and therefore expensive, which does not meet the economic strategy in terms of the recycling of wastes. Another common option for glass ceramics production is a direct heat treatment process. Although the raw materials are not melted, it need to be shaped firstly by compacting the mixed powder and then sinter the compact at targeted heat treatment temperatures (Aloisi et al., 2006, Appendino et al., 2004, Barbieri et al., 2002, Bernardo et al., 2009, Tang et al., 2013). It is also a cost in producing the powder and there are some limitations on the size and shape of compositions that may be compacted. Therefore, it is important to develop a new processing method in order to implement widespread availability of these hazardous industrial and municipal wastes.

Vitrification of hazardous wastes has been proved to be an attractive method for a safe immobilization of heavy metals in the glass matrix and the obtained vitrified slag (VS) can convert into glass ceramic materials through a two-stage heat treatment (Cheng, 2004, Lin et al., 2006, Luan et al., 2010, Kavouras et al., 2007). From the viewpoint of energy consumption reduction, if a certain amount of raw materials can directly reuse without melting, the energy consumption in the process can be reduced compared to common vitrification and sintering method. Based on this consideration, a more economical and simple method of co-sintering of vitrified amorphous slag and oil shale fly ash is proposed for the recycling of these two kinds of fly ash in the study. Oil shale fly ash and bottom ash were vitrified into the slag and then converted into the glass ceramic composite with the addition of various percentages of oil shale fly ash by the subsequent sintering process. The objective of our research is to explore the possibility of producing waste-based glass ceramic composites by the proposed method. To validate this hypothesis, the present study has been conducted to (i) produce glass ceramic composites using vitrified slag with various percentages of oil shale fly ash; (ii) characterize some important indexes of the products (density, weight loss on ignition, sintering shrinkage, compressive strength, chemical resistance and heavy metal leaching); (iii) study the phase transformation process and co-sintering mechanism of vitrified amorphous slag and oil shale fly ash by thermal analysis and XRD analysis. The results of the study will provide fundamental knowledge for the development of waste-based glass ceramic composites through a simple and low energy consumption process.

Section snippets

Raw material

OSFA used in this study was obtained from the thermal power plant, Jilin, China; and MSWI BA was obtained from municipal solid waste incinerator, Dalian, China. OSFA and MSWI BA that removed any coarse impurities were dried at 105 °C for 24 h in an electric dry oven, and then were graded to pass sieve NO. 150 (the diameter of mesh is 106 μm) for subsequent experiments. As a result of preliminary experiments, the raw ash mixture of 80% OSFA and 20% BA (marked as RAM) by weight were used in this

Chemical compositions and XRD analysis of raw materials

The chemical compositions and total heavy metals content of OSFA and BA are given in Table 1. It can be seen that SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and CaO were the main compositions for oil shale fly ash, while CaO and SiO2 were major in bottom ash. It indicated that the mixture of OSFA and BA was suitable raw material to produce glass ceramic materials. It will be a double-win choice, because it not only can turn OSFA and BA into resource, but also can reduce the cost of raw materials, achieving the maximal

Conclusions

The study highlighted a modified method for recycling oil shale fly ash and MSWI bottom ash into a low-cost glass ceramic composite. They were pre-mixed, vitrified into slag and converted into the glass ceramic composites with the addition of various percentages of oil shale fly ash. XRD results revealed that the crystalline phases of glass ceramic composites were anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8) and quartz (SiO2). Sintering shrinkage, weight loss on ignition, density and compressive strength of glass

References (31)

Cited by (52)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text