Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 15, Issue 12, 1 December 2015, Pages 2493-2502
The Spine Journal

Clinical Study
Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.067Get rights and content

Abstract

Background Context

Evaluation of sagittal alignment is essential in the operative treatment of spine pathology, particularly adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, software applications for detailed spino-pelvic analysis are usually complex and not applicable to routine clinical use.

Purpose

This study aimed to validate new clinician-friendly software (Surgimap) in the setting of ASD.

Study Design/Setting

Accuracy and inter- and intra-rater reliability of spine measurement software were tested. Five users (two experienced spine surgeons, three novice spine research fellows) independently performed each part of the study in two rounds with 1 week between measurements.

Patient Sample

Fifty ASD patients drawn from a prospective database were used as the study sample.

Outcome Measures

Spinal, pelvic, and cervical measurement parameters (including pelvic tilt [PT], pelvic incidence [PI], lumbar-pelvic mismatch [PI-LL], lumbar lordosis [LL], thoracic kyphosis [TK], T1 spino-pelvic inclination [T1SPI], sagittal vertical axis [SVA], and cervical lordosis [CL]) were the outcome measures.

Methods

For the accuracy evaluation, 30 ASD patient radiographs were pre-marked for anatomic landmarks. Each radiograph was measured twice with the new software (Surgimap); measurements were compared to those from previously validated software. For the reliability and reproducibility evaluation, users measured 50 unmarked ASD radiographs in two rounds. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) reproducibility values were calculated. Measurement time was recorded.

Results

Surgimap demonstrated excellent accuracy as assessed by the mean absolute difference from validated measurements: PT: 0.12°, PI: 0.35°, LL: 0.58°, PI-LL: 0.46°, TK: 5.25°, T1SPI: 0.53°, and SVA: 2.04 mm. The inter- and intra-observer reliability analysis revealed good to excellent agreement for all parameters. The mean difference between rounds was <0.4° for PT, PI, LL, PI-LL, and T1SPI, and <0.3 mm for SVA. For PT, PI, LL, PI-LL, TK, T1SPI, and SVA, the intra-observer ICC values were all >0.93 and the inter-observer ICC values were all >0.87. Parameters based on point landmarks rather than end plate orientation had a better reliability (ICC≥0.95 vs. ICC≥0.84). The average time needed to perform a full spino-pelvic analysis with Surgimap was 75 seconds (+25).

Conclusions

Using this new software tool, a simple method for full spine analysis can be performed quickly, accurately, and reliably. The proposed list of parameters offers quantitative values of the spine and pelvis, setting the stage for proper preoperative planning. The new software tool provides an important bridge between clinical and research needs.

Introduction

The importance of sagittal alignment analysis in adult spinal deformity (ASD) has long been emphasized [1], and numerous studies have reported the deleterious impact of spino-pelvic malalignment on patient-reported outcomes [2], [3]. Accurate sagittal alignment analysis has become an essential tool in treatment planning for ASD and can be used to calculate the correction needed [4], [5], [6]; inadequate treatment can result in poor postoperative alignment and patient-reported outcomes [7], [8].

Despite its importance, analysis of the sagittal plane and individualized surgical planning can be an arduous practice. In response, dedicated software has emerged to simplify sagittal plane assessment. Multiple forms of digital measurement software have been shown to be faster, more accurate, more precise, and less variable than manual techniques [9], [10]. These computer-based measurements provide a step forward in sagittal spino-pelvic evaluation, but their application remains largely limited to research: although nearly 90% of spine surgeons recognize the importance of such software, less than half regularly use software to analyze and plan sagittal realignment procedures [11].

Even with computerized software, the process of spino-pelvic analysis on radiographs has until recently involved several complex steps, and many current software applications are considered time-consuming, technically demanding, and unpractical. Most existing dedicated spine software programs require extensive measurements to generate spino-pelvic parameter values [12], [13]. In one such case, the user must identify the femoral heads and the superior and inferior end plates of every single vertebra in the spine to generate measurements; in addition, such programs have complicated interfaces and are often limited to the computers in which they are installed. As a result, these programs are used primarily in the research realm, but are difficult to implement for routine clinical use.

Surgimap (Nemaris Inc, New York, NY, USA) is a dedicated spine measurement and surgical planning software that was developed to be applicable in both the research and the clinical realms [14]. Within one application, users can upload images and use a variety of tools for measuring coronal and sagittal radiographs. By identifying key parameters on the radiograph with 11 cursor clicks, an entire collection of spino-pelvic parameters can be automatically and instantaneously generated. Parameters can be modified, shown to patients, and saved by the clinician for future analysis. Finally, Surgimap can be run from either a desktop or a portable storage device (such as a universal serial bus [USB]), allowing the entire database of images and measurements to be carried by the physician to the office, the operating room, or any other location, without the need for additional software or specific operating systems. Authors have advocated the use of this platform based on its effective and clinically useful osteotomy simulations and surgical planning [14]. The reliability of this software has been established in a recent study [15], but since that publication, a more sophisticated, yet user-friendly sagittal alignment tool has been incorporated into the software.

The current study validates the accuracy and reliability of this specialized sagittal alignment tool. By simplifying the sagittal plane analysis, the software can provide a more efficacious and applicable method to routine clinical evaluation of important spino-pelvic parameters.

Section snippets

Patient population

For this single-center study, subjects were selected from a database of ASD patients. Institutional review board approval was obtained before study initiation. Subjects were enrolled if they were older than 18 years and met radiographic criteria for ASD: coronal Cobb angle >20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >5 cm, pelvic tilt (PT) >25°, or thoracic kyphosis (TK) >60°. Patients were excluded if their deformity was caused by malignant, neuromuscular, infectious, or traumatic etiology. Both

Part 1: accuracy

Mean values of key parameters as measured by SpineView were as follows: PT: 26.5°±14.3, PI: 62.2°±12.3, PI–LL: 10.4°±28.0, and SVA: 39.8 mm±70. Mean values for the same parameters as measured by Surgimap were PT: 26.5°±14.3; PI: 62.0°±112.3; PI-LL: 10.4°±27.9; SVA: 38.4 mm±69. Mean absolute differences and SDs are shown in Table 1. The minimum differences for all angular parameters was less than or equal to 0.01°. The pelvic parameters (PI, SS, and PT), which were directly measured by anatomic

Discussion

Sagittal plane analysis is critical in the evaluation and treatment of spinal pathology, as well as the assessment of postoperative alignment success. Radiographic evaluation is crucial, as radiographic measurements usually correlate well with patient-reported outcomes [24]. Although most providers appreciate the importance of radiographic evaluation, there is still a gap between the awareness of its utility and its use in daily practice. One of the main limitations of spine measurement

Conclusions

Findings from this study demonstrate the accuracy, intra- and inter-observer reliability, and efficacy of a spine measurement software tool. Although measurements based on points were more reliable than end plate angle parameters, all parameters showed good to excellent validity and reliability. The software allows for measurement of radiographs with ease and speed, providing a vast array of opportunities for assessment of spinal pathology for physicians and researchers alike. Thus, the current

References (34)

  • M. Akbar et al.

    Use of Surgimap Spine in sagittal plane analysis, osteotomy planning, and correction calculation

    Neurosurg Clin N Am

    (2013)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2012)
  • V. Lafage et al.

    Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2009)
  • S.D. Glassman et al.

    The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2005)
  • B. Moal et al.

    Discrepancies in pre-operative planning and operative execution in the correction of sagittal spinal deformities

  • S.L. Ondra et al.

    Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2006)
  • J.-C.C. Le Huec et al.

    Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment

    Eur Spine J

    (2011)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough? Clinical article

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2012)
  • B. Blondel et al.

    Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2013)
  • B. Ilharreborde et al.

    Angle measurement reproducibility using EOS three-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2011)
  • J.M. Mok et al.

    Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2008)
  • V. Lafage et al.

    Adult spinal deformity surgeons are unable to accurately predict post-operative spinal alignment: initial analysis of a three-phase study

  • C. Maillot et al.

    Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops(®)

    Eur Spine J

    (2015)
  • S. Champain et al.

    Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies

    Eur Spine J

    (2006)
  • A. Vila-Casademunt et al.

    The reliability of sagittal pelvic parameters: the effect of lumbosacral instrumentation and measurement experience

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2015)
  • F.D. Faro et al.

    Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2004)
  • V. Lafage et al.

    The T1 pelvic angle (TPA), a novel radiographic parameter of sagittal deformity, correlates strongly with clinical measures of disability

    Spine J

    (2013)
  • Cited by (165)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    FDA device/drug status: Approved (Surgimap 2.0).

    Author disclosures: RL: Nothing to disclose. EF: Nothing to disclose. JKH: Nothing to disclose. VC: Fellowship Support: SOFCOT (C, Paid directly to institution/employer). BD: Nothing to disclose. BL: Nothing to disclose. VL: Stock Ownership: Nemaris Inc (20% Ownership, Paid to author); Speaking and/or Teaching Arrangements: Medicrea (D, Paid to author), DePuy (C, Paid to author), Nemaris Inc (20% Ownership, Paid to author), MSD (B, Paid to author); Board of Directors: Nemaris Inc (amount unknown, Stock ownership); Grants: DePuy (D, Paid directly to institution/employer), SRS (D, Paid directly to institution/employer), NIH (D, Paid directly to institution/employer). FS: Royalties: MSD (B, Paid to author), K2M (B, Paid to author); Stock Ownership: Nemaris Inc (30% Ownership, Paid to author); Consulting: K2M (D, Paid to author), Medicrea (E, Paid to author), MSD (B, Paid to author); Speaking and/or Teaching Arrangements: MSD (B, Paid to author), Medicrea (C, Paid to author), K2M (B, Paid to author), Biomet (B, Paid to author), NuVasive (B, Paid to author); Board of Directors: Nemaris Inc (amount unknown, 20% Ownership, Paid to the author); Grants: DePuy (E, Paid directly to institution/employer), MSD (E, Paid directly to institution/employer), AO (D, Paid directly to institution/employer).

    The disclosure key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.TheSpineJournalOnline.com.

    View full text