ASMBS online statements/guidelines

Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure

Currently, the increasing numbers of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) brought this technique in the third position in order of frequency, behind sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, OAGB is still considered lack of evidence in reducing obesity- related comorbidities. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy for SG and OAGB improving type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission and weight loss in obese patients.

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OAGB and SG. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to analyze the data, and the right effect model was chosen based on heterogeneity.

Five randomized controlled trials were included in the study. The remission of T2DM in the OAGB group was more efficient at 1 year and 5 years. Meanwhile, the OAGB group has a greater improvement than the SG group in terms of hypertension (HTN) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Although the percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) between the OAGB and SG groups was not significant at 6 months, the OAGB group had a conspicuous %EBMIL at 1 year. And 5 years after surgery, a higher percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was found in the OAGB group. Besides, the OAGB group showed a lower body mass index (BMI) at 5 years than the SG group, but the BMI at 6 months and 1 year were not significant. Finally, at 6 months, the OAGB group exhibited a more remarkable percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) than the SG group.

In general, OAGB exhibited a better therapeutic effect in T2DM, HTN, and weight loss than SG in the medium-term follow-up period. To assess the long-term efficacy, clinics should be encouraged to continue longer-term follow-up studies and possibly RCTs.

National data show a trend favoring laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) over Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Published data demonstrating the differences in weight loss between the two procedures are mixed.

In this retrospective study using clinical data from 2010 to 2020, we compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients undergoing either SG or RYGB to evaluate their long-term weight loss outcomes.

University hospital in the United States.

A total of 3329 patients were identified in our institutional Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement database using Current Procedural Terminology codes for either RYGB or SG. A general linear model was used for baseline characteristics. Logistic regression was used for factors favoring RYGB versus SG. A multivariable linear mixed model was used for weight-trajectory analysis. Cox regression was used for a cumulative hazard ratio of 10% weight regained from nadir.

Factors favoring RYGB were diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and gastroesophageal reflux disease, Hispanic ethnicity, and surgeon’s preference. SG was favored among Black patients and smokers. RYGB was associated with more weight loss at all time points. The risk of weight regain was significantly higher after SG versus RYGB.

The bariatric procedure choice is significantly influenced by race, medical history, and surgeon’s experience. RYGB results in a significantly more durable weight loss compared with SG regardless of race or other stratification factors.

Today, Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has recently become the most common bariatric procedure among various bariatric surgical procedures due to its advantages. The aim of this study is to investigate nutritional status, body composition and biochemical parameters following SG.

This was a prospective study, the subjects were patients who underwent SG at a special obesity clinic in İstanbul, Turkey, between 01.05.2017 and 01.11.2017. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the participants was 42.15 ± 4.84 kg/m² for men and 41.44 ± 4.34 kg/m² for women, preoperatively. Nutritional status, some anthropometric measurements and blood sampling were taken at each visit. Data were collected and analyzed for the present study at the following periods: pre-operation (pre-op), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery.

A total of 47 SG patients (20 men, 27 women) were evaluated. The mean BMI was 30.23 ± 3.56 kg/m² for men and 30.35 ± 4.36 kg/m² for women after 6 months and the amount of excess weight loss (EWL) increased in the 3 months (p < .001). Mean energy, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin B₁, niacin, vitamin B₁₂, folate, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, phosphorus and iodine were above the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) recommendations. A significant association was found between protein intake and fat free mass loss in both genders after SG at 6 months (p < .05).

Nutrition deficiencies are common for patients after SG. Therefore, it is important to routinely monitor these patients with a professional team.

In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, tissue thickness and closed staple height of the staple cartridge determine the pressure applied to the tissue. Prior studies have suggested 8 g/mm² to be ideal to minimize leaks or bleeding.

We evaluated the relationship between staple loading pressure applied to gastric tissue and bleeding rate prospectively with a novel tissue measuring device and video-recorded operative findings for 116 patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. Stapling protocol 1 was used for 64 cases, defined as standard practice, typically using green-blue-blue-blue Ethicon staple cartridges. Stapling protocol 2 was defined as blue-blue-white-white or gold-blue-white-white.

Tissue thickness measurements from 39 cases and staple load selection showed that surgeons preferred a median staple loading pressure of 15 g/mm². Tissue thickness measurements at 15 g/mm² had a mean of 1.86 mm at the antrum, 1.71 mm at the body, and 1.15 mm at the fundus, all significantly thinner than tissue thickness at 8 g/mm². For each 10 g/mm² increase in minimum pressure and maximum pressure value within each cartridge zone, there was a reduction in bleeding rate by 59.8% and 38.7%, respectively. Compared with stapling protocol 1, stapling protocol 2 had a lower intraoperative bleeding rate (90.2% vs 70.7%; P < .0001), usage of preventive hemostatic techniques (100% vs 10%; P < .0001), and hemostatic treatments (66% vs 46%; P = .04). In the 30-day postoperative period, there was 1 bleed in stapling protocol 1; there were no leaks.

Our data suggest using shorter closed staple heights to exert higher staple loading pressures decreases intraoperative bleeding rates in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.