Anhedonia in schizophrenia: Distinctions between anticipatory and consummatory pleasure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Research on anhedonia in schizophrenia has revealed mixed results, with patients reporting greater anhedonia than healthy controls on self-report measures and semi-structured interviews, but also reporting comparable experiences of positive emotions in response to pleasurable stimuli. Basic science points to the importance of distinguishing between anticipatory and consummatory (or in-the-moment) pleasure experiences, and this distinction may help to reconcile the mixed findings on anhedonia in schizophrenia. In two studies, we tested the hypothesis that anhedonia in schizophrenia reflects a deficit in anticipatory pleasure but not consummatory pleasure. In Study 1, we used experience sampling methodology to assess reported experiences of consummatory and anticipated pleasure among schizophrenia patients and controls. In Study 2, schizophrenia patients and controls completed a self-report trait measure of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure and interviews that assessed negative symptoms, including anhedonia, and community functioning. In both studies, we found evidence for an anticipatory but not a consummatory pleasure deficit in schizophrenia. In addition, anticipatory pleasure was related to clinical ratings of anhedonia and functional outcome. Clinical and research implications of these findings are discussed.

Introduction

Although anhedonia, defined as an inability to experience pleasure, has long been considered a core feature of schizophrenia, recent research raises fundamental questions about the nature of this emotional disturbance. On the one hand, patients report experiencing lower levels of pleasure than controls on self-report trait measures and in semi-structured interviews (see Horan et al., 2006b for a review). On the other hand, patients report experiencing as much pleasant emotion as controls in response to emotionally evocative stimuli (e.g., Berenbaum and Oltmanns, 1992, Kring and Earnst, 1999, Kring and Neale, 1996).

In an effort to reconcile these findings, we have proposed that the nature of the anhedonia deficit in schizophrenia is more circumscribed (Germans and Kring, 2000, Kring, 1999). Drawing on neurobehavioral models that distinguish between components of hedonic experience (e.g., Berridge and Robinson, 2003, Depue and Collins, 1999, Gard et al., 2006, Knutson et al., 2001), we proposed that schizophrenia patients experience normal levels of pleasure when directly engaged in an enjoyable activity, or consummatory pleasure, but experience disturbances in the experience of pleasure related to future activities, or anticipatory pleasure. These aspects of hedonic experience have distinguishable neural circuitry, neurotransmitter involvement, and behavioral sequelae. Anticipatory pleasure appears to rely heavily, though not exclusively, on dopamine and the mesolimbic pathway whereas serotonergic and opioid systems appear to be more centrally involved in consummatory pleasure (Berridge and Robinson, 1998, Schultz, 2002, Wise, 2002). Anticipatory pleasure can be further parsed into two components: (1) predicting the future experience of pleasure, and (2) the concurrent experience of pleasure knowing that a future activity is going to occur — that is, the pleasure experienced in anticipation of things to come. In addition, anticipatory pleasure is linked to motivational processes that promote goal-directed behaviors aimed at achieving desired rewards (Carver, 2001, Dickinson and Balleine, 1995, Schultz, 2002). Thus, to the extent that schizophrenia patients exhibit deficits in anticipatory pleasure, we would expect this to be linked to a decrement in goal-directed behavior.

In the current studies, we used convergent methods to evaluate the hypothesis that schizophrenia patients have an anticipatory but not consummatory pleasure deficit. In Study 1, we examined daily reports of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls over the course of one week. Using the experience sampling method, we assessed participants' ability to predict future pleasure from both goal-directed and non-goal-directed activities. In Study 2, we administered a battery of self-report and interview-based measures, including a trait measure of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure, to schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. The trait measure used in Study 2 assesses the experience of pleasure in anticipation of future events. To further establish the validity of this pleasure distinction in schizophrenia, we examined the correlates of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure in schizophrenia patients, including other measures of anhedonia, approach motivation, and functional outcome.

Section snippets

Participants

Outpatients with either schizophrenia (n = 10) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 5) participated. Diagnoses were confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (First et al., 1994). Individuals were excluded from the study if they reported current alcohol or drug abuse, a history of head trauma or loss of consciousness, poor fluency in English, or an active mood episode. All patients were taking medication, either typical (n = 10) or atypical (n = 5) antipsychotics.1

Study 2

In Study 2, participants completed the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS), a trait measure of pleasure in anticipation and consummatory pleasure (Gard et al., 2006), which measures pleasure experienced in the moment and in anticipation of future activities. We hypothesized that patients would score lower than controls on the anticipatory scale but not the consummatory scale. In addition, we investigated the correlates of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure. We hypothesized that

General discussion

Across two studies using complementary methods, schizophrenia patients reported as much pleasure in the moment as controls in their daily lives and on a measure of trait consummatory pleasure. However, schizophrenia patients predicted that future daily life events would be less pleasurable, and they reported experiencing less pleasure in anticipation of future events compared to healthy controls. Further supporting the distinction between anticipatory and consummatory pleasure, clinical ratings

Role of the funding source

Study 1 was funded, in part, from funding from NARSAD. Funding for Study 2 was provided by grants MH43292 and MH65707 to Dr. Green and the VISN 22 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center.

Contributors

Study 1 was designed by Ann Kring and David Gard, and data were collected at UC Berkeley with Ann Kring, David Gard, and Marja Germans Gard. Study 2 was designed by all authors, and data were collected at UC Berkeley with Ann Kring, David Gard and Marja Germans Gard, and at VA with William Horan and Michael Green. David Gard wrote the first draft of the manuscript, undertook the statistical analyses, and coordinated the feedback and input of the other authors. All authors contributed to and

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Laila Ansari, Phuong Chou, Matthew Goodman, and Barbara Stuart for their help with data entry and collection.

References (38)

  • N.C. Andreasen

    The Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS)

    (1983)
  • S.M. Arnfred et al.

    Exploration of somatosensory P50 gating in schizophrenia spectrum patients: reduced P50 amplitude correlates to social anhedonia

    Psychiatry Research

    (2004)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Cognitive approaches to schizophrenia: theory and therapy

    Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

    (2005)
  • H. Berenbaum et al.

    Emotional experience and expression in schizophrenia and depression

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1992)
  • J.J. Blanchard et al.

    Medication status of participants in psychopathology research: selective review of current reporting practices

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1992)
  • A.S. Bryk et al.

    Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods

    (1992)
  • D.D. Burns

    The Feeling Good Handbook

    (1999)
  • C.S. Carver

    Affect and the functional bases of behavior: on the dimensional structure of affective experience

    Personality and Social Psychology Review

    (2001)
  • C.S. Carver et al.

    Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    Portions of this research were presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Psychopathology in October, 2000 in Boulder, Colorado and at the Society for Research in Psychopathology in November, 2003 in Toronto, Canada.

    View full text