Diagnosis, Clinical Features, and Therapeutic Implications of Agitated Depression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2019.10.011Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Depression is a complex disorder with multiple symptomatic clusters, including affective, cognitive, and physical dimensions, with a heterogeneous clinical presentation.

  • Agitated “unipolar” depression is a distinct affective syndrome conceptualized as lying on the continuum of the bipolar disorder spectrum or as a distinct unipolar depression. This difference has obvious therapeutic and prognostic implications.

  • The clinical picture of agitated “unipolar” depression is characterized by low mood,

The problem of classification of agitated “unipolar” depression

In the modern classification systems, the diagnosis of agitated depression is unclear and misleading. In 1978, with the approval of Research Diagnostic Criteria, agitated depression was considered a subtype of depressive episode, which could be present either during a major depressive disorder or during a bipolar disorder.10 In the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-III),14 the category of MDD included several depressive states, such as melancholic

What is agitated “unipolar” depression?

The original definitions of agitated “unipolar” depression described an affective state in which mood and ideation were in the negative polarity and activity in the opposite polarity.11 It has also been called “excited depression” or “depression with excitatory symptoms,” pointing out the presence of symptoms of excitement (ie, restlessness, talkativeness, flight of ideas, irritability) together with a depressed mood within the same affective episode.

Koukopoulos and Koukopoulos9 proposed that

Suicidality in agitated depression

Suicidal behaviors are due to the interaction between biological, psychosocial, and sociocultural factors. People suffering from agitated depression are at high risk of suicide, especially for the presence of racing thoughts and general restlessness. Because of flight of ideas and high levels of impulsivity, patients can take life-threatening decisions and risky behaviors. Other elements concurring to the high suicidal risk include the rapid cycling course, the predominant depressive polarity,

Therapeutic implications

Agitated depression is a severe clinical condition that requires a specific management and treatment plan. The main challenge is represented by its adequate identification and appropriate diagnosis.50,64 In case of patients with treatment-resistant depression, who failed to respond to treatment with 4 or 5 sequential trials of antidepressants over a period of years, a diagnosis of agitated depression should always be considered.65 Moreover, many patients with this disorder—even if they are on a

Summary

Agitated “unipolar” depression represents a potentially dangerous clinical entity, given the high associated risk of suicide. It is extremely relevant for clinicians, mental health professionals, patients, carers, and all mental health stakeholders to adequately identify, diagnose, and treat it. This clinical condition has been neglected for many years, and therefore, there is still an open and ongoing debate about the correct classification of this disorder. In particular, it should be

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Carmela Palummo, Benedetta Pocai, Luca Steardo Jr, Arcangelo Di Cerbo, and Francesca Zinno, all from the Department of Psychiatry of the University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy.

Disclosure

The authors have nothing to disclose.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (75)

  • G.H. Vázquez et al.

    Mixed symptoms in major depressive and bipolar disorders: A systematic review

    J Affect Disord

    (2018)
  • M. Takeshima et al.

    Association between the so-called “activation syndrome” and bipolar II disorder, a related disorder, and bipolar suggestive features in outpatients with depression

    J Affect Disord

    (2013)
  • M.P. Caligiuri et al.

    A quantitative neuromotor predictor of antidepressant non-response in patients with major depression

    J Affect Disord

    (2003)
  • M. Bak et al.

    The pharmacological management of agitated and aggressive behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Eur Psychiatry

    (2019)
  • R. Bottlender et al.

    Mixed depressive features predict maniform switch during treatment of depression in bipolar I disorder

    J Affect Disord

    (2004)
  • H.S. Akiskal et al.

    The evolving bipolar spectrum. Prototypes I, II, III, and IV

    Psychiatr Clin North Am

    (1999)
  • A. Fiorillo et al.

    Assessment and management of cognitive and psychosocial dysfunctions in patients with major depressive disorder: a clinical review

    Front Psychiatry

    (2018)
  • R.S. McIntyre et al.

    Cognitive deficits and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: determinants, substrates, and treatment interventions

    Depress Anxiety

    (2013)
  • R.D. Reynolds CF et al.

    Screening for depression: the global mental health context

    World Psychiatry

    (2017)
  • J. Ormel et al.

    Prevention of depression will only succeed when it is structurally embedded and targets big determinants

    World Psychiatry

    (2019)
  • R.C. Kessler et al.

    The epidemiology of depression across cultures

    Annu Rev Public Health

    (2013)
  • World Health Organization

    Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates

  • A.C. Swann

    Activated depression: mixed bipolar disorder or agitated unipolar depression?

    Curr Psychiatry Rep

    (2013)
  • R.L. Spitzer et al.

    Research diagnostic criteria for a selected group of functional disorders

    (1978)
  • E. Kraepelin

    Manic-depressive insanity and paranoia

    (1921)
  • Diagnostical and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III)

    (1980)
  • M.B. First et al.

    Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey

    World Psychiatry

    (2018)
  • F. Benazzi

    Depressive mixed states: unipolar and bipolar II

    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

    (2000)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2013)
  • M. Luciano et al.

    Critical evaluation of current diagnostic classification systems in psychiatry: the case of DSM-5

    Riv Psichiatr

    (2016)
  • L. Pingani et al.

    The crisis in psychiatry: a public health perspective

    Int Rev Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • G.S. Malhi et al.

    Exclusion of overlapping symptoms in DSM-5 mixed features specifier: heuristic diagnostic and treatment implications

    CNS Spectr

    (2017)
  • M. Zimmerman

    Measures of the DSM-5 mixed-features specifier of major depressive disorder

    CNS Spectr

    (2017)
  • G. Perugi et al.

    Mixed features in patients with a major depressive episode: the BRIDGE-IIMIX study

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • L. Tondo et al.

    Characteristics of depressive and bipolar disorder patients with mixed features

    Acta Psychiatr Scand

    (2018)
  • A. Koukopoulos et al.

    Why DSM-5 is wrong (and so was DSM-IV)

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • B.B. Lahey et al.

    Validity and utility of the general factor of psychopathology

    World Psychiatry

    (2017)
  • Cited by (15)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text