Insight into illness, neurocognition and quality of life in schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.10.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of insight into illness on self-reported quality of life (QoL) for patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the psychiatric department of a French public university teaching hospital. The data collected included socio-demographic information, clinical characteristics, medications, cognitive performance assessments, insight into illness, and the S-QoL 18. A multivariate analysis using multiple linear regressions was performed to determine variables potentially associated with QoL levels.

Results

One hundred and thirteen outpatients with stable schizophrenia were enrolled in our study.

Significant associations were found between QoL and socio-demographic characteristics: a higher QoL was associated with marital status (in couple) and employment. Concerning insight into illness, lower QoL levels were associated with better awareness of the mental disorder, whereas higher QoL levels were associated with better awareness of positive and negative symptoms. Elementary neuropsychological measures were not statistically associated with QoL.

Conclusion

Insight into illness, marital status and employment were the most important features associated with QoL, whereas there was no evidence that elementary neurocognition directly influenced QoL. The different facets of insight into illness should be considered to guide the development of specific interventions intended to improve QoL. Moreover, this study highlights the need for clinicians to pay more attention to the personal impact of schizophrenia, especially upon family life and work.

Highlights

► We assess the impact of insight on quality of life (QoL) for patients with schizophrenia. ► We consider neurocognitive functions and socio-demographic characteristics. ► Insight into illness, marital status and employment were the most important features associated with QoL. ► Elementary neurocognition did not influence directly QoL. ► The different facets of insight should be considered to guide the development of specific interventions intended to improve QoL.

Introduction

Quality of life (QoL) measurements have become an important way of evaluating the treatments and care provided to patients with schizophrenia (Hofer et al., 2005a, Hofer et al., 2005b). QoL is of the utmost importance to patients and their families, and it encompasses several important dimensions, such as psychological status, functional abilities, personal well-being, social interaction, economic status, vocational status, and physical health (Cramer et al., 2000). Understanding determinants of QoL in schizophrenia is of importance for developing effective interventions that can improve the functional and subjective well-being of patients. However, the determinants of QoL are poorly understood in this population (Tolman and Kurtz, 2010).

Over the last decades, numerous studies have investigated the value of socio-demographic characteristics, psychiatric symptoms, neurocognition, and insight into illness as predictors of QoL (Addington and Addington, 2008, Aksaray et al., 2002, Fitzgerald et al., 2001, Hofer et al., 2005a, Hofer et al., 2005b, Kurtz et al., 2008, Matsui et al., 2008, Prouteau et al., 2005, Woon et al., 2011). However, their results were conflicting because these studies have varied in design, selected characteristics, the sample examined, and the manner in which QoL was defined and measured. Age, gender, educational level, living conditions, and professional status appeared to be potential predictors of QoL (Caron et al., 2005, Folsom et al., 2009, Hofer et al., 2005b, Quercioli et al., 2008, Woon et al., 2011). Several meta-analyses revealed that (1) symptoms, mainly general psychopathology symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression), have only a modest relationship with QoL (Eack and Newhill, 2007), and (2) neurocognition was largely unrelated to or, for some neurocognitive domains (e.g., speed of processing), negatively related to subjective QoL (Tolman and Kurtz, 2010). Finally, previous studies (Aghababian et al., 2011, Hasson-Ohayon et al., 2006, Kurtz and Tolman, 2010) found that patients with better insight into illness reported a lower QoL. Among the determinants of QoL, insight into illness is particularly relevant because preserved insight has been suggested to be a predictive value for the treatment outcome in schizophrenia, especially when improving adherence to treatment and reducing the risk of relapse and re-hospitalisation (X. F. Amador et al., 1994, Quee et al., 2011). The direction of the relationship between insight and QoL, which can appear paradoxical, should be explored by taking into account the multidimensional aspect of insight and potential confounding factors.

To our knowledge, there no previous study has investigated the impact of insight into illness on QoL in patients with schizophrenia while considering key confounding factors such as neurocognitive functions and socio-demographic characteristics. Only one study has documented the potential impact of insight into illness and elementary neurocognition on QoL (Kurtz and Tolman, 2011). This study found that insight into illness and neurocognition have inverse relationships with QoL. However, in this study, a moderate sample was enrolled (n = 71), insight into illness was measured using the “Lack of Judgment and Insight” item on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the multivariate analysis did not include socio-demographic factors, and, finally, the study used the Satisfaction With Life (SWL) scale, which is a QoL measure not specifically developed for patients with schizophrenia (Test et al., 2005).

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of insight into illness on self-reported QoL in patients with schizophrenia. QoL was measured using a specific QoL questionnaire designed for people with schizophrenia (S-QoL 18) (Boyer et al., 2010), and insight into illness was analysed in its multidimensional aspects (X.F. Amador and Strauss, 1990).

Section snippets

Study design and population

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the psychiatric department of a French public university teaching hospital. The inclusion criteria were the following: a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) criteria (APA, 1994), age over 18 years, stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (no need for hospitalisation at inclusion and no major change in the patient condition for 2 months prior to inclusion (Appelberg

Sample characteristics

One hundred and thirteen outpatients with schizophrenia were enrolled in our study. The characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1, Table 2. The mean age was 38.6 years (sd = 10.8 years), 70% were male, 93% were single, 45% had a university level education, and 53% suffered from paranoid schizophrenia. The majority of patients were taking atypical antipsychotics (96%) with an average dose of chlorpromazine of approximately 570 mg. The mean scores of insight were 4.81 (sd = 2.01) for

Discussion

Our findings highlight the different facets of insight into illness that did not interact consistently with QoL. The negative relationship between awareness of mental disorder and QoL is consistent with the results of previous studies. Aghababian et al. found that patients with better insight reported a lower QoL (Aghababian et al., 2011), a finding that was confirmed by another more recent study (Kurtz and Tolman, 2011). Awareness of a mental disorder, including having a mental disorder, the

Conclusion

Insight into illness, marital status and employment were the most important features associated with QoL, whereas there was no evidence that elementary neurocognition directly influenced QoL. The different facets of insight into illness should be considered when developing specific interventions to improve QoL for patients of schizophrenia. Moreover, this study highlights the need for clinicians to pay more attention to the personal impact of schizophrenia, especially upon family life and work.

Role of funding source

This work was supported by a national grant from the Ministry of Health (PHRC).

Contributors

LB, RR, PA, and CL wrote the manuscript.

VA, MCS, PA, and CL designed the study and wrote the protocol.

LB and RR managed the literature searches and analyses.

LB, AL, and PA managed the statistical analyses.

All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

None.

References (60)

  • D.P. Folsom et al.

    Physical and mental health-related quality of life among older people with schizophrenia

    Schizophr Res

    (2009)
  • C.A. Galletly et al.

    Relationships between changes in symptom ratings, neurophysiological test performance and quality of life in schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine

    Psychiatry Res

    (1997)
  • I. Hasson-Ohayon et al.

    Insight into psychosis and quality of life

    Compr Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • A. Hofer et al.

    Patient outcomes in schizophrenia II: the impact of cognition

    Eur Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • A. Hofer et al.

    Patient outcomes in schizophrenia I: correlates with sociodemographic variables, psychopathology, and side effects

    Eur Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • M.M. Kurtz et al.

    Neurocognition, insight into illness and subjective quality-of-life in schizophrenia: what is their relationship?

    Schizophr Res

    (2011 Apr)
  • M.M. Kurtz et al.

    Symptoms versus neurocognition as predictors of change in life skills in schizophrenia after outpatient rehabilitation

    Schizophr Res

    (2008)
  • M. Matsui et al.

    Cognitive functioning related to quality of life in schizophrenia

    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • J.M. Narvaez et al.

    Subjective and objective quality of life in schizophrenia

    Schizophr Res

    (2008)
  • A. Prouteau et al.

    Cognitive predictors of psychosocial functioning outcome in schizophrenia: a follow-up study of subjects participating in a rehabilitation program

    Schizophr Res

    (2005)
  • I. Sibitz et al.

    The impact of the social network, stigma and empowerment on the quality of life in patients with schizophrenia

    Eur Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • A.B. Staring et al.

    Stigma moderates the associations of insight with depressed mood, low self-esteem, and low quality of life in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

    Schizophr Res

    (2009)
  • G. Thornicroft et al.

    The personal impact of schizophrenia in Europe

    Schizophr Res

    (2004)
  • C. van Zelst

    Stigma and schizophrenia

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • P.T. Yanos et al.

    Internalized stigma as a barrier to improvement in vocational functioning among people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders

    Psychiatry Res

    (2010)
  • D.A. Young et al.

    A comparison between an interview and a self-report method of insight assessment in chronic schizophrenia

    Schizophr Res

    (2003)
  • X.F. Amador et al.

    Awareness of illness in schizophrenia and schizoaffective and mood disorders

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • X.F. Amador et al.

    The scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder

    (1990)
  • X.F. Amador et al.

    Assessment of insight in psychosis

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • N.C. Andreasen et al.

    Theory of mind and schizophrenia: a positron emission tomography study of medication-free patients

    Schizophr Bull

    (2008)
  • Cited by (61)

    • The insight paradox in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of the relationship between clinical insight and quality of life

      2020, Schizophrenia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Regarding subdomain analyses, ten studies utilized measures of insight that had a subscale corresponding to awareness of illness (see Fig. 3 for a forest plot of included studies). Effect sizes were largely negative (k = 8), with only two studies reporting small, positive effects (Boyer et al., 2012; Smith et al., 1999). When meta-analyzed, results indicated a small, negative effect size (r = −0.19) that was statistically significant.

    • Stronger default mode network connectivity is associated with poorer clinical insight in youth at ultra high-risk for psychotic disorders

      2018, Schizophrenia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      By nature of this sample, there was a limited range of CI compared to studies of schizophrenia because individuals with severely impaired clinical insight would likely be diagnosed with schizophrenia. Further, psychometrics of the SUMD were previously assessed in schizophrenia populations (Amador et al., 1993; Boyer et al., 2012; Michel et al., 2013), but internal consistency was low in this sample. While variability in this population is expected, it would be beneficial to investigate validity of the SUMD in a larger UHR sample.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text