Review ArticleHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis and treatment: An updated review of the evidence☆
Introduction
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF; HFpEF) is a clinical entity characterized by symptoms of HF despite a “preserved” (i.e. 50%) left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) with evidence of cardiac dysfunction as a primary cause of symptoms (eg, abnormal LV filling and elevated filling pressures). Currently, HFpEF affects approximately 4.9% of the general population aged ≥60 years and accounts for approximately half of total HF hospitalizations.1 Initial retrospective and observational studies including mostly hospitalized patients classified on LVEF alone, the rates of hospitalization and death in patients with HFpEF were similar to those of patients diagnosed with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF).2 In prospective and randomized studies in which the diagnosis of HFpEF was made using stricter criteria and other causes of HF (eg, valvular heart diseases, restrictive/infiltrative cardiomyopathies, pericardial diseases) were excluded, however, the cardiovascular (CV) mortality observed was lower in HFpEF compared to those with HFrEF.3,4
To date, several randomized controlled trials have failed to identify effective pharmacological therapies on clinical outcomes in HFpEF, perhaps due to the unfavorable one-size-fits-all approach for its management5. The scientific community of clinicians and clinical scientists has a growing interest in understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and phenotypic heterogeneity of HFpEF, with hopes to develop new therapeutic strategies.6 The aim of the present review is to provide an overview on HFpEF pathophysiology and diagnostic pathways, with a focus on the latest developments of treatment strategies and their potential future applications in routine clinical practice.
Section snippets
HFpEF pathophysiology
HFrEF is characterized by the presence of definitive cardiac abnormalities central to which is depressed LV systolic function, while HFpEF has traditionally been diagnosed as a clinical syndrome of HF in the setting of normal EF.7 Diastolic dysfunction has emerged as fundamental to the HFpEF syndrome and there is compelling evidence for failure of the Frank-Starling mechanism, defined as the ability to translate an increase in LV filling pressure to an increase in cardiac output or only doing
HFpEF definition and diagnostic algorithm
According to the latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, HFpEF diagnosis requires the presence of compatible signs and symptoms, a ‘preserved’ EF (defined as LVEF ≥50%), elevated levels of natriuretic peptides (brain natriuretic peptide [BNP] > 35 pg/mL and/or N-terminal-pro hormone BNP [NT-proBNP] > 125 pg/mL) and objective evidence of cardiac functional and structural alterations consistent with HF.17 Moreover, stress testing or invasive measures of elevated LV filling
Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of HFpEF
To date, no treatment has been shown to reduce clinical events including CV and all-cause mortality in HFpEF. For such reason, guidelines merely recommend diuretics for fluid removal and symptoms relief (eg, edema),25 and management of associated comorbidities (eg, hypertension, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).17 Beta-blockers (BBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and
Phenotyping treatment for HFpEF
Therapeutic futility in HFpEF may be, at least in part, explained by the phenotypic diversity within the HFpEF population (Fig. 3). The potential benefit of some interventions could have been diluted in an “unselected” HFpEF population or offset by conjunctive non-effective strategies. In the last years, many attempts in phenotyping HFpEF have been made by stratifying HFpEF patients on the basis of associated comorbidities (e.g. obesity, diabetes, coronary artery disease, AF, arterial
Controversies and future directions
To date, pharmacological therapies have shown to be ineffective in reducing CV mortality in HFpEF patients, as well as exercise capacity. On the other hand, nonpharmacologic strategies such as exercise training, caloric restriction-induced weight loss and improvement in quality of diet may offer new prospective treatment and hopes for HFpEF.
Far from being only a primitive heart disease, HFpEF has to be considered a heterogenous systemic condition involving the heart with different comorbidity
Conclusions
In conclusion, although HFpEF pathophysiological mechanisms are becoming clearer over the years, there is still no effective treatment. Numerous trials are underway for future successful therapies; in the meantime, we should not forget the importance of preventive strategies and to aggressively address associated comorbidities. To finish with the words of Samuel Beckett: “Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.”
Funding
None.
Statement of conflict of interest
Salvatore Carbone is supported by a Career Development Award 19CDA34660318 from the American Heart Association.
Acknowledgments
None.
References (118)
- et al.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: separating the wheat from the chaff
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2020) - et al.
Prior heart failure hospitalization, clinical outcomes, and response to Sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in HFpEF
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2020) - et al.
Physical activity, fitness, and obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
JACC Hear Fail
(2018) - et al.
Obesity and heart failure: focus on the obesity paradox
Mayo Clin Proc
(2017) - et al.
Epidemiology of heart failure: the prevalence of heart failure and ventricular dysfunction in older adults over time. A systematic review
Eur J Heart Fail
(2016) - et al.
Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
N Engl J Med
(2006) - et al.
Primary and secondary diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Am J Cardiol
(2018) - et al.
The survival of patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: an individual patient data meta-analysis: Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC)
Eur Heart J
(2013) Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Nat Rev Cardiol
(2020)- et al.
Research priorities for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Circulation
(2020)
Heart failure
JACC Hear Fail
The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Nat Rev Cardiol
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: refocusing on diastole
Int J Cardiol
Mechanisms of diastolic dysfunction in heart failure
Trends Cardiovasc Med
Exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosing and ranking its causes using personalized O 2 pathway analysis
Circulation
Exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure: JACC state-of-the-art review
J Am Coll Cardiol
Cardiac output response to exercise in relation to metabolic demand in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Eur J Heart Fail
Global cardiovascular reserve dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
J Am Coll Cardiol
The parallel tales of microvascular angina and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a paradigmshift
Eur Heart J
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in perspective
Circ Res
2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure
Eur Heart J
Exercise hemodynamics enhance diagnosis of early heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Circ Hear Fail
Role of diastolic stress testing in the evaluation for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a simultaneous invasive-echocardiographic study
Circulation
A simple, evidence-based approach to help guide diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Circulation
Letter by Del Buono et al regarding article, “a simple, evidence-based approach to help guide diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.”
Circulation
How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Eur Heart J
Low NT-proBNP levels in overweight and obese patients do not rule out a diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
ESC Hear Fail
Evidence supporting the existence of a distinct obese phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Circulation
Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring guides management to reduce decompensation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Circ Hear Fail
FASTTRACK randomized trial to determine the effect of nebivolol on mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with heart failure (SENIORS)
Eur Heart J
Effects of the long-term administration of nebivolol on the clinical symptoms, exercise capacity, and left ventricular function of patients with diastolic dysfunction: results of the ELANDD study
Eur J Heart Fail
Effects of carvedilol on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the Japanese Diastolic Heart Failure Study (J-DHF)
Eur J Heart Fail
Beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: an individual patient-level analysis of double-blind randomized trials
Eur Heart J
Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-preserved trial
Lancet
The perindopril in elderly people with chronic heart failure (PEP-CHF) study
Eur Heart J
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
N Engl J Med
The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators
N Engl J Med
Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms
N Engl J Med
Effect of spironolactone on diastolic function and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the Aldo-DHF randomized controlled trial
JAMA-J Am Med Assoc
Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
N Engl J Med
Effect of aldosterone antagonism on exercise tolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
J Am Coll Cardiol
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure
N Engl J Med
Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
N Engl J Med
The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial
Lancet
PARAgON-HF—why we do randomized, controlled clinical trials
N Engl J Med
Sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of heart failure: time for a Paragon?
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
Effects of digoxin on morbidity and mortality in diastolic heart failure: the ancillary digitalis investigation group trial
Circulation
Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study
Lancet
Effect of ivabradine in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EDIFY randomized placebo-controlled trial
Eur J Heart Fail
The cGMP signaling pathway as a therapeutic target in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
J Am Heart Assoc
Cited by (0)
- ☆
Statement of conflict of interest: see page XX.