Elsevier

Nurse Education Today

Volume 32, Issue 3, April 2012, Pages 246-249
Nurse Education Today

Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: The positive and the negative

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.007Get rights and content

Summary

It is imperative for nurse educators to provide accurate student evaluations to prepare them for the workplace. The impetus for transformation in nursing education has created the need for educators to effectively evaluate the quality of student achievement and learning through the educational process. Therefore, a rubric that consistently assesses student performance and provides meaningful feedback is essential in today's learning environment. If students are not given feedback that is consistent or meaningful, then they may feel their grades are not valid, thus sending mixed messages to the student. If expectations are not clear, the unacceptable performance may transfer into the work environment.

Section snippets

Current evaluation tools in nursing education

For the past 30 years, there has been overwhelming evidence that new graduate nurses are not prepared to enter the workforce (Edwards and Cummings, 1982, Harkisn et al., 1983, Schoessler and Waldo, 2006). This issue is important to nursing because an unprepared new graduate can be perilous to patients' safety; setting them up for professional dissatisfaction. An effective evaluation process begins in education with reliable tools ensuring nursing students are competent and safe to enter into

History of rubric

Historically, rubrics have been utilized in secondary and higher education to evaluate specific assignments or tasks for decades dating back to the 1960s (Isaacson and Stacy, 2009, Rosa et al., 2009). Diederich, French, and Carlton are credited with developing the rubric. They conducted a study and found 94% or 300 student papers received grades that were not consistent, thus affecting inter-rater reliability. Following the study, Diederich, French, and Carlton developed the following list of

Analytic rubric

The analytic rubric provides separate components for each task of the assignment providing guidance to the student who may have difficulty with a specific area of the assignment. The components essential to the rubric include concise performance criteria, rating scale, and descriptions of the expected performance at each level (Montgomery, 2000, Suskie, 2009). The analytical rubric requires a careful design with clearly identified criteria that students must display to demonstrate proficiency (

The Rubric's positive qualities

The American Association of Higher Education (AAHE) promotes principles of good practice in undergraduate education such as contact between faculty and students; reciprocity and cooperation among students; active learning techniques; prompt feedback; using time well; high expectations, and respect for diverse talents and ways of learning (Astin et al., 1996, Chickering and Ehrmann, 1996, Lunney and Sammarco, 2009). Rubrics can assist in meeting some of these principles such as encouraging

The Rubric's negative qualities

Researchers have found limitations to utilizing rubrics when depicting performance expectations. Consequently, this creates issues with educator bias and unreliable scores (Gantt, 2010, Knight et al., 2010, Kohn, 2006). The issues of educator bias regarding what constitutes an acceptable performance can undermine the performance standard. Nash and Lewandowski (2010) found faculty who know and understand the students' emotional lives result in a productive learning environment. On the contrary,

Creating awareness of the Rubric's weakness

When educators are aware of the weaknesses of the rubric, adjustments can be made to enhance student learning and a cognizant effort can be made to limit bias. A recent in-depth study of professional preparation of nurses in the U.S., sponsored by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, identified a need for nursing educators to make clearer linkages between theory content and clinical practice (Lasater, 2011). A well-formulated rubric such as LCJR serves as a tool to help

Conclusion

Despite the concerns of using a rubric, a well-designed and formulated rubric can be an effective evaluation tool for nursing education. Our society demands high quantity care and highly competent nurses. However, the supply of educational tools to both our faculty members and students seems overdue. There is a pressing need for further nursing education research on using the rubric in order to best prepare students for professional practice (Lasater, 2011). The state of science in nursing

References (48)

  • J. Greenwood

    Critique of the graduate nurse: an international perspective

    Nurse Education Today

    (2000)
  • J. Isaacson et al.

    Rubrics for clinical evaluation: objectifying the subjective experience

    Nurse Education in Practice

    (2009)
  • K. Lasater

    Clinical judgment: the last frontier for evaluation

    Nurse Education in Practice

    (2011)
  • H. Andrade

    Teaching with rubrics: the good, the bad, and the ugly

    College Teaching

    (2005)
  • H. Andrade et al.

    Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing

    The Journal of Educational Research

    (2009)
  • J. Arter et al.

    Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom: Using Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance

    (2001)
  • W. Astin et al.

    Nine Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning

    (1996)
  • M. Bresciani et al.

    Examining design and inter-rater reliability of a rubric measuring research quality across multuiple diciplines

    Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation

    (2009)
  • B. Broad

    What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing

    (2003)
  • H. Burley et al.

    What works with authentic assessment

    Educational Horizons

    (2003)
  • A. Campbell

    Application of ICT and rubrics to the assessment process where professional judgment is involved: the features of an e-marking tool

    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

    (2005)
  • W. Carpenter

    The other side of rubrics

    Educational Horizons

    (2009)
  • V. Chapman et al.

    A conundrum: rubrics or creativity/metacognitive development?

    Educational Horizons

    (2009)
  • A. Chickering et al.

    Implementation of the Seven Principles; Technology as Lever

    (1996)
  • B. Cooper et al.

    Rubrics in education old term, new meaning

    Phi Delta Kappan

    (2009)
  • L. Costa et al.

    Why we need self-directed learners

  • R. Edwards et al.

    Nurse-extern program eases “reality shock” for new staff nurses

    Hospitals

    (1982)
  • L. Gantt

    Using the Clark simulation evaluation rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students

    Nursing Education Perspectives

    (2010)
  • H. Goodrich-Andrade

    The trouble with a narrow view of rubrics

    English Journal

    (2006)
  • E. Hall et al.

    Chocolate chip cookies and rubrics, helping students understand rubrics in inclusive settings

    Teaching Exceptional Children

    (2003)
  • S. Harkisn et al.

    Summer externs: easing the transition

    Nursing Management

    (1983)
  • A. Hitt et al.

    Best in show: teaching old dogs to use new rubrics

    The Professional Educator

    (2009)
  • H. Jae et al.

    Objectivity in grading: the promise of bar codes

    College Teaching

    (2009)
  • J. Knight et al.

    Using six sigma methods to evaluate the reliability of a teaching assessment rubric

    The Business Review, Cambridge

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Tel.: + 1 540 982 2463x1508.

    2

    Tel.: + 1 513 862 7765.

    3

    Tel.: + 1 540 375 4200x264.

    View full text