Elsevier

Manual Therapy

Volume 12, Issue 3, August 2007, Pages 209-218
Manual Therapy

Original article
Changes in pelvic floor and diaphragm kinematics and respiratory patterns in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain following a motor learning intervention: A case series

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.06.006Get rights and content

Abstract

This study was a case series design. The objectives of the study were to investigate the ability of a motor learning intervention to change aberrant pelvic floor and diaphragm kinematics and respiratory patterns observed in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) during the active straight leg raise (ASLR) test.

The ASLR test is a valid and reliable tool to assist in the assessment of load transference through the pelvis. Irregular respiratory patterns, decreased diaphragmatic excursion and descent of the pelvic floor have been reported in subjects with SIJP during this test. To date the ability to alter these patterns has not been determined.

Respiratory patterns, kinematics of the diaphragm and pelvic floor during the ASLR test and the ability to consciously elevate the pelvic floor in conjunction with changes in pain and disability levels were assessed in nine subjects with a clinical diagnosis of SIJP. Each subject then undertook an individualized motor learning intervention. The initial variables were then reassessed.

Results showed that abnormal kinematics of the diaphragm and pelvic floor during the ASLR improved following intervention. Respiratory patterns were also influenced in a positive manner. An inability to consciously elevate the pelvic floor pre-treatment was reversed. These changes were associated with improvement in pain and disability scores.

This study provides preliminary evidence that aberrant motor control strategies in subjects with SIJP during the ASLR can be enhanced with a motor learning intervention. Positive changes in motor control were associated with improvements in pain and disability. Randomized controlled research is required to validate these results.

Introduction

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and surrounding ligamentous structures are reported to be a source of symptoms in subjects with a diagnosis of non-specific chronic low back pain (Young et al., 2003). Recent research has focused on a test that investigates the ability of a subject to transfer load between the lower limb and the trunk, called the active straight leg raise (ASLR) test. The validity and reliability of this test procedure has been established in subjects with clinically diagnosed SIJ pain (SIJP) (Mens et al., 1999, Mens et al., 2001; O’Sullivan et al., 2002a). This test involves lying supine and raising the leg 5 cm off the supporting surface. The test is positive when accompanied by a primary sensation of profound heaviness of the leg (±pain), which is relieved with the application of compression across the ilium. This test is reported to be positive in a sub-group of subjects with SIJP (Mens et al., 1999; Pool-Goudzwaard et al., 2005). It has been proposed that the reduction in the sensation of heaviness with the application of compression across the ilia reflects enhanced force closure through the SIJ (Pool-Goudzwaard et al., 1998; O’Sullivan et al., 2002a).

Recent research has documented motor control deficits in the presence of SIJP (O’Sullivan et al., 2002a). O’Sullivan et al. (2002a) reported in a group of SIJP subjects with a positive ASLR the presence of aberrant motor control strategies observed during the ASLR test when compared to pain-free controls. Using real time ultrasound and spirometry, the authors’ demonstrated decreased diaphragmatic motion, increased descent of the pelvic floor, increased minute ventilation and respiratory rate, and altered breathing patterns in the pain subjects during the ASLR. These aberrant motor control strategies were eliminated with the addition of manual compression through the ilia applied during the ASLR.

It was hypothesized that these disruptions might represent a deficit in local motor control (pelvic floor, transverse abdominal wall) within the lumbopelvic region in these subjects. This manifested as the adoption of splinting or bracing strategies of the abdominal wall with associated disrupted patterns of respiration during the ASLR, not observed in the normal subjects (O’Sullivan et al., 2002a). Furthermore the normalization of these patterns with the application of compression supported this notion. The adoption of these splinting strategies appears to represent an underlying deficit in the motor control systems ability to provide adequate local compression, or force closure, to the SIJs during the ASLR (O’Sullivan et al., 2002a). This concept is also supported by the report that abdominal bracing is less effective than preferential activation of the transverse abdominal wall muscles for increasing the compression across the SIJs (Richardson et al., 2002).

To test the validity of this hypothesis we proposed that the application of a motor learning intervention directed to the local stabilizing muscles of the pelvis would result in the normalization of the aberrant motor control strategies displayed by these subjects, with associated reductions in pain and disability.

Previous studies have reported motor learning interventions to be effective in altering specific motor control deficits in the presence of chronic low back (O’Sullivan et al., 1997, O’Sullivan et al., 1998) and knee pain (Cowan et al., 2002), but to date no study has investigated these specific changes with SIJP during the ASLR test.

Section snippets

Methods

Nine subjects (8 female and 1 male) with a clinical diagnosis of SIJP and a positive ASLR test were recruited for this study. These subjects were recruited directly from a previous study by O’Sullivan et al. (2002a) providing a series of clinical case studies. Four of the 13 subjects from the original study declined to be involved in the intervention aspect of the study as they were already under different forms of management. The inclusion criteria included pain over the SIJ without proximal

Intervention model

The motor learning intervention model utilized in this study was adapted from work described elsewhere (O’Sullivan et al., 1997; Richardson et al., 1999; O’Sullivan, 2005b). This model is directed by the specific classification of a group of disorders where deficits in motor control appear to be a mechanism for increased strain and resultant ongoing pain (Elvey and O’Sullivan, 2005; O’Sullivan, 2005a). Within this management model the impairments of motor control that are considered to be

Results

The individual pre-treatment data for respiratory rate, tidal volume, diaphragmatic motion and pelvic floor kinematics for these subjects was extracted from our previous study (O’Sullivan et al., 2002a) and reprocessed as a new group to provide the pre-intervention baseline for this case intervention series.

Discussion

This study provides preliminary evidence that a specific motor learning intervention for subjects with SIJP can positively change pelvic floor and diaphragm kinematics and patterns of respiration observed during the ASLR. These changes were associated with concurrent reductions in pain and disability in a group of chronically disabled pelvic pain subjects. However as this study is a case series and did not have a control group or blinded independent investigators, the findings should be viewed

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the statistical support of Marie Blackmore and the assistance of Julie Beetham, Anita Avery, Ivan Lin, Beatrice Tucker, Jillian Crisp, Felicitas Graf and Chris Perkin.

References (47)

  • C. Snijders et al.

    Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs. Part 2: loading of the sacroiliac joints when lifting in a stooped posture

    Clinical Biomechanics

    (1993)
  • S. Young et al.

    Correlation of clinical examination characteristics with three sources of chronic low back pain

    The Spine Journal

    (2003)
  • Avery AF, O’Sullivan PB, McCallum M. Evidence of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in subjects with chronic sacro-iliac...
  • K. Bo et al.

    Knowledge about and ability to correct pelvic floor muscle exercises in women with urinary stress incontinence

    Neurourology and Urodynamics

    (1988)
  • E. Cohen et al.

    Excursion–volume relation of the right hemidiaphragm measured by ultrasonography and respiratory airflow measurements

    Thorax

    (1994)
  • S.M. Cowan et al.

    Physical therapy alters recruitment of the vasti in patellofemoral pain syndrome

    Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

    (2002)
  • J. DeLancey

    Functional anatomy of the pelvic floor and urinary continence mechanism

  • R. Elvey et al.

    A contemporary approach to manual therapy

  • J.C. Fairbank et al.

    The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire

    Physiotherapy

    (1980)
  • J.W. Frymoyer et al.

    Psychologic factors in low-back-pain disability

    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

    (1985)
  • J.A. Hides et al.

    Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for first-episode low back pain

    Spine

    (2001)
  • B. Hungerford et al.

    Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment in the presence of sacroiliac joint pain

    Spine

    (2003)
  • J.Y. Maigne et al.

    Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain

    Spine

    (1996)
  • Cited by (71)

    • Intra-abdominal pressure correlates with abdominal wall tension during clinical evaluation tests

      2021, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      With this scenario, the participant must be able to combine the respiratory and postural functions of the diaphragm, which is a frequent problem in clinical practice (Kawabata et al., 2010; Shirley et al., 2003). It is speculated that individuals unable to do so maybe in a greater risk of developing LBP in the future (Ostwal and Wani, 2014; O'Sullivan and Beales, 2007). During the last scenario, the participants were holding a barbell of a weight corresponding with 20% of body weight.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text