Acquired: Aortic valve
Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve

Read at the 96th Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, May 14-18, 2016, Baltimore, Maryland.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.089Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the midterm hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve.

Methods

In a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, follow-up study, 710 patients underwent surgical implantation of a pericardial stented aortic prosthesis (Trifecta valve; St Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minn). The valve is constructed from bovine pericardium mounted externally onto a titanium stent. Subjects were followed on an annual basis over 6 years.

Results

Operations were performed from 2007 to 2009, and mean age was 72.4 ± 9.3 years; 471 of 710 (66.3%) were men. Preoperatively, 361 of 710 (50.8%) of patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and at 6 years postoperatively, 92 of 96 (95.8%) were New York Heart Association class I or II. Six years postoperatively, average mean gradient across all valve sizes was 11.0 mm Hg, and the average effective orifice area index was 0.80 cm2/m2. The proportion of patients without moderate-to-severe valvular regurgitation at 6 years was 95.2% (80/84). Six years postoperatively, freedom from valve-related mortality, nonstructural dysfunction, and paravalvular leak were 98.3%, 98.6%, and 98.9%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration was 97.3% (95% confidence limits, 98.6-94.7).

Conclusion

These midterm results demonstrate that the Trifecta valve is a safe and effective valve substitute with excellent hemodynamic performance and durability that is maintained through the 6-year follow-up period.

Key Words

aortic valve replacement
bioprosthesis
gradient
durability

Abbreviations and Acronyms

NYHA
New York Heart Association
SVD
structural valve deterioration
TAVR
transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Cited by (0)

This study was sponsored by St Jude Medical, who was responsible for collecting and analyzing the data and for collaborating with the investigators regarding the preparation and submission of this manuscript. The authors had freedom to explore the data with final authority to submit the manuscript for publication. The manuscript was drafted by the authors with assistance provided by Dan Gutfinger, MD (see Acknowledgements), who had full access to the data.

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Numbers: NCT00475709, NCT01514162, and NCT01593917.