Shoulder
Does bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty decrease scapular notching?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.015Get rights and content

Background

The purpose of this cohort study was to compare scapular notching rates, range of motion, and functional outcomes between patients who underwent a standard Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and patients who underwent bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. We hypothesized that the BIO-RSA cohort would have lower notching rates and improved rotational range of motion; however, validated outcome scores between cohorts would be no different.

Methods

A comparative cohort study was designed after a sample size calculation. A total of 40 patients were studied with 20 in each cohort (RSA vs BIO-RSA). All patients underwent an interview and physical examination. Outcomes included range of motion; shoulder strength; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; Simple Shoulder Test score; Constant score; and Global Rating of Change scale score. Radiographs were obtained for all patients and examined for scapular notching.

Results

When we compared demographic characteristics between the standard RSA and BIO-RSA cohorts, including age, sex, and follow-up duration, there were no significant differences between groups (P > .05). In addition, there were no significant differences between cohorts when we compared forward elevation (P = .418); external rotation (P = .999); internal rotation (P = .071); strength (P > .376); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .229); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .579); Simple Shoulder Test score (P = .522); Constant score (P = .917); or Global Rating of Change scale score (P = .167). The frequency of scapular notching, however, was significantly higher (P = .022) in the RSA cohort than in the BIO-RSA cohort: 75% versus 40%.

Conclusions

Although the scapular notching rate was significantly higher in the standard RSA group, no other outcome measures were statistically different, including range of motion, strength, and validated outcome scores.

Section snippets

Methods

A retrospective comparative cohort study was designed after a sample size calculation indicated that a total of 36 patients (18 in each cohort) would be required to show a 50% reduction in notching rates (α = .05, λ = 7.99). This sample size would also allow detection of a minimal clinically important difference of 6.4 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) points between cohorts5 (TB Edwards et al unpublished data March 2013). For enhancement, the total study group was increased to 40

Results

For the entire cohort of 40 patients, the mean age at surgery was 74 ± 6 years and there were 17 male and 23 female patients. At a mean follow-up of 34 ± 13 months (all patients had >24 months' follow-up), the mean DASH score was 20 ± 16, the mean ASES score was 69 ± 11, the mean SST score was 9.6 ± 2.4, the mean Constant score was 61 ± 10, and the mean GRC scale rating was +4.5 ± 0.5. The mean range of motion at final follow-up was as follows: active forward elevation, 141° ± 14°; active

Discussion

Scapular notching has been described as a problem, rather than a complication, after RSA.9 The reported incidence of notching in the literature varies and has been associated with implant design characteristics. A recent systematic review reported an overall notching rate of 35%, with a 50% notching rate with use of a Grammont-style implant.9 Several methods may be used to decrease the potential for impingement between the medial aspect of the humeral implant and the lateral scapular pillar,

Conclusion

This comparative cohort study showed no substantial differences between standard RSA and BIO-RSA with respect to range of motion, strength, or validated outcome scores at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up, whereas the rate of scapular notching was significantly lower in the BIO-RSA cohort than in the standard Grammont-style arthroplasty cohort. However, at short-term follow-up, the presence of scapular notching did not have a substantial effect on patient outcomes.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr T. Bradley Edwards for assistance with this research project.

Disclaimer

A research foundation with which George S. Athwal, Kenneth J. Faber, and Darren Drosdowech are affiliated received research support from Tornier, which manufactures the implant used in this study. Tornier had no input into this research project in any manner.

The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (103)

  • Subacromial notching after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

    2023, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus

Institutional review board approval was obtained from Western University/St. Joseph's Health Care (file No. 103218).

View full text