Review
Vitamin D3 and calcidiol are not equipotent

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.01.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • It is recommended, as endorsed by international clinical guides, to use Vitamin D3 to treat vitamin D deficiency.

  • In several parts of the world, the use of calcidiol at the same dose than Vitamin D3 is an extended prescription.

  • Our data confirm the available evidence stating that they are not equipotent. This may lead to over-dosage.

  • Calcifediol is faster and 3–6 times more powerful to obtain adequate serum levels of 25(OH)D in the medium-long term.

  • This circumstance must be assessed and included in the therapeutic prescription guides of Osteoporosis.

Abstract

Despite the discussion on the optimal threshold of 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum level continues, there is now consensus on the fact that post-menopausal and elderly populations have inadequate Vitamin D serum levels worldwide. The adjustment of these levels is necessary to improve both bone and general health, as it is to optimize bone response to antiresortive treatments. It is recommended, as endorsed by international clinical guides, to use Vitamin D3, the physiological form of Vitamin D, in a dose range between 600–2000 IU. It should be administered on a daily basis or on its weekly or monthly equivalents. In Spain, the use of calcidiol (25(OH)D3) at the same dose than Vitamin D3 is the most extended prescription, notwithstanding the available evidence stating that they are not equipotent. This may lead to over-dosage.

In order to provide evidence on this circumstance, a convenience study was performed. Four groups of ten post-menopausal osteoporotic women each (average age 67), deficient in Vitamin D ((25(OH)D 37.5 ± 10 nmol/L)) were enrolled. Each group followed a different treatment regimen: (G1) vitamin D3 20 μg/day [800 IU/day]; (G2) 25 (OH)D3 20 μg/day; (G3) 25(OH)D3 266 μg/week and (G4) 25(OH)D3 0.266 mg every two weeks. 25(OH)D levels were measured for each group at 0, 6 and 12 months, with the following results: G1 (40.5 ± 4.7;80.0 ± 2; 86.2 ± 23.7), G2 (37,2 ± 4.2; 161 ± 21.7;188.0 ± 24.0), G3 (38 ± 3.7;213.5 ± 80.0; 233.0 ± 81.2), G4 (39.5 ± 4;164.5 ± 41,7;210.5 ± 22.2).

These data reveal that both metabolites are not equipotent. Calcidiol is faster and 3–6 times more potent to obtain serum levels of 25(OH)D in the medium to long term. This circumstance must be assessed and included in the therapeutic prescription guides for Osteoporosis, since it should be of concern when planning and prescribing treatments to normalize serum levels of 25(OH)D3 and avoid potential adverse impacts.

Introduction

Despite the discussion on the optimal serum threshold of 25-hydroxyvitamin D continues, between 50 nmol/L [1] and 75 nmol/L [2], [3], there is now a general consensus on the fact that post-menopausal and elderly populations have inadequate vitamin D serum levels worldwide [4], [5].

The adjustment of these levels is necessary to improve both bone and general health [6], [7], as it is to optimize bone response to antiresortive treatments [8], [9]. It is recommended, as endorsed by international clinical guidelines, to use Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) – the physiological form of Vitamin D – in a dose range between 600–2000 IU. The biological potency of Vitamin D is established as international units (IU), so that 1 μg of cholecalciferol is equivalent to 40 IU [1]. In that context, vitamin D should be administered on a daily basis or on its weekly or monthly equivalents [10].

In some parts of the world, such as Spain, other vitamin D metabolites like calcidiol (25 hydroxyvitamin D3) are available for use in the treatment of osteoporosis [11], [12]. Nevertheless, this metabolite is not an equipotent substitute for adequate vitamin D replacement because all the recommendations have been done with cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3) [13]. Calcidiol compared with cholecalciferol is more hydrophilic, has a shorter half-life, and causes more rapid and sustained increase in serum 25(OH)D concentrations [14], [15].

In Spain, the use of calcidiol at a dose similar to Vitamin D3 is the most extended prescription, notwithstanding the consistent evidence stating that they are not equipotent [16], [17]. This fact may lead to over-dosage and risk of hypervitaminosis D and hypercalcemia induced by calcidiol [18], as evidenced by a review of cases reported to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System [19].

Based upon the foregoing, in this study we have evaluated the efficacy of calcidiol vs. Vitamin D3 in increasing 25-hydroxyvitamin D -25(OH)D- serum levels, a convenience study in order to provide evidence of the differences between both metabolites prescribed in the common practice posology.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

This convenience study was conducted, after receiving the informed consent, at the Mineral Metabolism Unit-IMIBIC of the Hospital Universitario “Reina Sofía”, Córdoba (Spain), latitude 36.7°. Forty post-menopausal osteopenic women with general good health, average age 67 years, and deficient in Vitamin D (37.5 ± 5 nmol/L) were studied. The patients were randomized for treatment with vitamin D3 in four groups comparable to each other with respect to all the evaluated characteristics. Each group

Results

Baseline levels, general anthropometrics and biochemical characteristics of the postmenopausal women (PM) enrolled in the study are shown in Table 1. All the PM (100%) had levels of vitamin D below 50 nmol/L at the beginning of the study.

At baseline, there was an inverse correlation between calcium and alkaline phosphatase levels (r: −0.392; p: 0.012). An inverse correlation was also found when levels of PTH were compared to phosphate (r: −0.388; p: 0.013) and 25(OH)D3 (r: −0.768; p: 0.000).

Discussion

Vitamin D status in humans is determined by measuring serum 25(OH)D concentration (2,7). Based upon the increase induced in 25(OH)D levels by calcidiol and cholecalciferol, our data do not support either the proposal stating that both metabolites are equipotent. Contrarily, our data confirm previous reports claiming that they are different molecules with different pharmacological mechanisms, which must be dosed differently to achieve the same target.

Calcidiol is a more polar metabolite than

References (33)

  • B. Dawson-Hughes et al.

    IOF position statement: vitamin D recommendations for older adults

    Osteoporos. Int.

    (2010)
  • J. Hilger et al.

    A systematic review of vitamin D status in populations worldwide

    Br. J. Nutr.

    (2014)
  • M.F. Holick

    Vitamin D deficiency

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2007)
  • R. Bouillon et al.

    Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice

    Endocr. Rev.

    (2008)
  • A. Díez-Pérez et al.

    Risk factors for prediction of inadequate response to antiresorptives

    J. Bone Miner. Res.

    (2012)
  • H.A. Bischoff-Ferrari et al.

    Benefit-risk assessment of vitamin D supplementation

    Osteoporos. Int.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Calcifediol as a therapeutic

      2023, Feldman and Pike's Vitamin D: Volume Two: Disease and Therapeutics
    • The vitamin D endocrine system: physiology and clinical significance

      2022, Revista Espanola de Cardiologia Suplementos
    • Treatment With 25-Hydroxyvitamin D<inf>3</inf> (Calcifediol) Is Associated With a Reduction in the Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Marker of Disease Severity in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Pilot Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

      2021, Endocrine Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, oral 25(OH)D3 is able to correct vitamin D deficiency more rapidly and consistently than oral vitamin D3.21,22 Based on vitamin D biologic potency, 1 IU of vitamin D3 is equivalent to 0.025 μg; proportionally, 25 μg = 1000 IU of vitamin D3.23 However, there is no gold standard for the equivalence between IUs and molecular mass with 25(OH)D3.

    • Vitamin D and Calcium Deficiency in the Elderly

      2020, Endocrinology of Aging: Clinical Aspects in Diagrams and Images
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text