Elsevier

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volume 49, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 1782-1786
Journal of Pediatric Surgery

PPS Papers
Multi-institutional practice patterns and outcomes in uncomplicated gastroschisis: A report from the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Gastroschisis is a resource-intensive birth defect without consensus regarding optimal surgical and medical management. We sought to determine best-practice guidelines by examining differences in multi-institutional practices and outcomes.

Methods

Site-specific practice patterns were queried, and infant–maternal chart review was retrospectively performed for gastroschisis infants treated at 5 UCfC institutions (2007–2012). The primary outcome was length of stay. Univariate analysis was done to assess variation practices and outcomes by site. Multivariate models were constructed with site as an instrumental variable and with sites grouped by silo practice pattern adjusting for confounding factors.

Results

Of 191 gastroschisis infants, 164 infants were uncomplicated. Among uncomplicated patients, there were no deaths and only one case of necrotizing enterocolitis. Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences in practices and outcomes by site. Despite wide variations in practice patterns, there were no major differences in outcome among sites or by silo practice, after adjusting for confounding factors.

Conclusions

Wide variability exists in institutional practice patterns for infants with gastroschisis, but poor outcomes were not associated with expeditious silo or primary closure, avoidance of routine paralysis, or limited central line and antibiotic durations. Development of clinical pathways incorporating these practices may help standardize care and reduce health care costs.

Section snippets

Overview

This is a retrospective cohort study of infants with gastroschisis who were evaluated antenatally and born at any of the five University of California Fetal Consortium sites (UCfC: UC San Francisco, UC Davis, UC Los Angeles, UC Irvine, and UC San Diego) during the years 2007–2012. A multi-institutional review board reliance registry provided approval for the study (IRB #10-04093). Patients were identified and maternal and neonatal data were gathered by chart review at each site directly.

Cohort characteristics

We identified 191 infants born with gastroschisis within the UCfC from 2007 to 2012. Twenty-three infants were excluded for complicated gastroschisis, including 19 with bowel atresia or stricture requiring reoperation (10%), two with ischemic bowel prior to definitive closure (1%), and two with severe pulmonary hypoplasia (1%). There were three deaths in these complicated cases. All occurred within the first 9 days of life in premature infants (30–36 weeks GA). Two of the infants had evisceration

Discussion

The optimal surgical and neonatal management of gastroschisis remains an area of debate. Despite abundant literature on the subject, consensus regarding best practice has not been reached. The current study is a large, contemporary, multi-institutional report on both preferred practice patterns and outcomes for infants with uncomplicated gastroschisis. The study confirms the existence of wide variability in institutional practice patterns, but importantly demonstrates that poor outcomes were

Funding

The UCfC is supported through the UC Research Opportunity Fund through UCOP. This research has been supported NIH/NCRR/NCATS UCLA CTSI Grant Number UL1TR000124. Leslie Lusk was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32 HD-07162).

Members of the UCfC Consortium

  • UCD: Erin Brown, MD; Nancy Field, MD; Diana Farmer, MD; Sima Parmar, MD; Francis Poulain, MD.; Laila Rhee Morris, MD; Yen Truong, MD; Nina Boe, MD; Nancy Field; Veronique Tache, MD

  • UCI: Megan Stephenson, MD; Cherry Uy, MD; Manny Porto, MD; Pamela Rumney, RNC; Deborah Wing, MD; Tamera Hatfield, MD; Nafiz Kiciman, MD

  • UCLA: Daniel DeUgarte, MD; Kara Calkins, MD; Rachel Gutkin, MD; Melanie Maykin; Dan Kahn, MD, PhD; Stephen Shew, MD; Kara Calkins, MD; Aisling Murphy, MD; Tina Nguyen, MD; Gary Satou,

Acknowledgments

We would to acknowledge David Elashoff (UCLA) for his statistical assistance and Dr. Kara Calkins (UCLA) for her thorough review of this manuscript.

Cited by (29)

  • Implementing a standardized gastroschisis protocol significantly increases the rate of primary sutureless closure without compromising closure success or early clinical outcomes

    2022, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The authors noted significant variability in how patients with gastroschisis are managed both within and across centers, ultimately concluding that this high degree of variability was predominantly due to a lack of standardized practice guidelines. In 2014, Lusk et al. echoed these findings by demonstrating significant variability in the management of gastroschisis within the five hospitals comprising the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCFC) [3]. Finally, a 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) study found that immediate closure was associated with a shorter length of stay and fewer surgical site infections, but was simultaneously associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and higher rates of nutritional support at discharge [23].

  • Antibiotic Stewardship for the Neonatologist and Perinatologist

    2021, Clinics in Perinatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Importantly, preoperative antibiotic use is a notable contributor to antibiotic exposure in the NICU, particularly for infants with abdominal wall defects and congenital diaphragmatic hernias, despite low rates of infection in the early postnatal period among infants with these surgical conditions.41–43 Potential opportunities for antibiotic stewardship among neonates undergoing surgical procedures include withholding perioperative antibiotics for designated clean procedures,44 standardizing and shortening courses of postoperative antibiotics,43,45–47 and limiting preoperative antibiotics to infants with evidence of clinical illness or in whom another reason for antibiotic administration may exist.41,42 There is no clear evidence that antibiotics need to be continued beyond 24 hours postoperatively, with 1 single-center, retrospective study finding no difference in the rates of SSI within 30 days of procedure, between neonates who received 24 hours or less of postoperative antibiotics versus those who received more than 24 hours of antibiotics after abdominal surgery.47

  • Assessment of gastroschisis risk factors in Egypt

    2020, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
  • Adherence to and outcomes of a University-Consortium gastroschisis pathway

    2020, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Our multi-institutional consortium developed a clinical pathway (i.e. clinical practice guidelines) for management of gastroschisis based on retrospective review of practices and outcomes [12].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the Pacific Association of Pediatric Surgeons Association 47th Annual Meeting on May 28, 2014.

View full text