Original ResearchThe Influence of Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis on Pulmonary Outcomes in New South Wales
Section snippets
Source of Data
Both the “screening” and “non-screening” groups comprised the cohort of patients previously studied at 5 and 10 years of age.3, 7 This historical cohort comprises 2 groups of children with CF, all of whom received their diagnosis and care from the CF Clinic at The Children's Hospital at Westmead (formerly Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children at Camperdown). The group of subjects with CF born in the 3 years immediately before newborn screening was introduced (July 1978–July 1981, n = 57), were
Differences in Outcome at 15 Years of Age
Of the original 57 subjects in the NSG, 2 subjects were lost to follow-up or had transferred to another CF center before their 15th birthday. An additional 7 had died before their 15th year, leaving a total of 48 from whom data were collected at 15 years. In the SG, data at 15 years were available for a total of 52 of the original 60 subjects. Of the remaining 8 subjects, 4 had died, and 4 had transferred to another center or were lost to follow-up before their 15th birthday.
A total of 11
Discussion
The results presented in this report from a cohort of children in Australia suggest that early treatment after diagnosis of CF via newborn screening improves clinical outcomes over the first 15 years of life. Mortality rates tended to be lower in the SG compared with the NSG, and lung function was significantly better preserved in surviving members of the SG compared with those survivors in the NSG. These findings coupled with the significantly higher chest X-ray and composite
References (15)
- et al.
Reduced morbidity in patients with cystic fibrosis detected by neonatal screening
Lancet
(1985) - et al.
Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: a comparison of two strategies for case detection in 1.2 million babies
J Pediatr
(1995) - et al.
Growth and nutritional indexes in early life predict pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis
J Pediatr
(2003) - et al.
Long term prognosis of patients with cystic fibrosis in relation to early detection by neonatal screening and treatment in a cystic fibrosis centre
Thorax
(1995) - et al.
Nutritional benefits of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis
N Engl J Med
(1997) - et al.
Clinical outcomes of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
(1999) - et al.
Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis through neonatal screening prevents severe malnutrition and improves long term growth
Paediatrics
(2001)
Cited by (62)
Does newborn screening improve early lung function in cystic fibrosis?
2022, Paediatric Respiratory ReviewsNewborn screening alone insufficient to improve pulmonary outcomes for cystic fibrosis
2021, Journal of Cystic FibrosisCystic fibrosis
2021, Biochemical and Molecular Basis of Pediatric DiseaseQuestion 10: Could the Burden of Care with Cystic Fibrosis Impact on Educational Outcomes?
2017, Paediatric Respiratory ReviewsCitation Excerpt :More specifically, extremely low levels of vitamin E during early childhood have been linked with impaired brain development [20]. With approximately 20% of teenagers developing CF related diabetes, there is the risk of hypoglycaemia, resulting in an imbalance between caloric intake [by mouth or with enteral feeds] and insulin dose [4]. Monitoring blood sugars becomes an important additional burden that they must accommodate in their already time-consuming routine.
Differences in Outcomes between Early and Late Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis in the Newborn Screening Era
2017, Journal of PediatricsCitation Excerpt :This result was also evident in both the LD-NBS-neg and LD-NBS-pos subset cohorts (when compared with their respective NBS-CF control cohorts). Although the association between NBS and improved long-term lung function has been limited,18,42 this finding has previously been reported in our NSW cohort.18,21 The worse lung function in the LD-CF cohort is probably associated with the significantly higher rate of mucoid P aeruginosa isolation compared with NBS-CF controls (42% vs 20%; P = .008).
Background and Epidemiology
2016, Pediatric Clinics of North America