Methylation patterns of cell-free plasma DNA in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2009.12.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

There is growing interest for identification of new targets for biomarker development in multiple sclerosis (MS). The goal of this study was to compare the concentration and the methylation patterns of cell-free plasma DNA (cfpDNA) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and healthy individuals.

Methods

Three 30-patient cohorts were examined: patients with RRMS, in either remission or exacerbation, and healthy individuals as controls. Concentration of cfpDNA was determined using a standard fluorometric assay. Patterns of methylation in 56 gene promoters were determined by a microarray-based assay (MethDet-56). The data were analyzed to identify statistically relevant differences among the study groups.

Results

The concentration of cfpDNA in patients with RRMS was four to eight-fold higher compared to healthy controls. Significant differences in cfpDNA methylation patterns were detected in all three comparisons: RRMS patients in remission versus healthy controls were recognized with 79.2% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity; RRMS patients in exacerbation versus healthy controls were recognized with 75.9% sensitivity and 91.5% specificity; and RRMS patients in exacerbation versus those in remission were recognized with 70.8% sensitivity and 71.2% specificity.

Conclusion

Based on our findings, we conclude that patients with RRMS display unique disease- and state-specific changes of cfpDNA. Our findings are of clinical significance as they could be used in the development of potentially new biomarkers for MS. This is the first report in our knowledge describing such changes of cfpDNA in patients with MS.

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) of unknown etiology. The natural course of the disease exhibits several clinical patterns: relapsing–remitting, secondary progressive, primary progressive, and relapsing progressive [1], [2]. The etiologic ambiguity and the clinical variability of the disease create significant diagnostic and prognostic uncertainties and reduce the opportunities for early diagnosis and treatment. Such diagnostic limitations have stimulated growing interest for biomarker development in MS, which has evolved in multiple directions [3]. Protein-based approaches are focused on the detection of altered levels of inflammatory molecules (antibodies, cytokines, etc.) [4], [5], [6], or other cellular proteins found in the bodily fluids of MS patients [7], [8]. Genetic-based approaches concentrate on the identification of genes, related to disease susceptibility or severity (HLA genes, etc.) [9], or on disease-associated genetic variations (single nucleotide polymorphisms, etc.) that may predict risk for disease development and progression [10], [11]. New, high throughput technologies have also been used for biomarker research [12]. However, despite the current research, success at identification of a biomarker for MS remains elusive.

Disease-associated changes in DNA methylation have recently gained interest for biomarker development. DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism of long-term regulation of gene expression. It is a process of chemical modification of DNA that adds a methyl group to a cytosine nucleotide when it is located upstream from a guanosine nucleotide (CpG dinucleotides), frequently within and near gene promoters. Abnormal DNA methylation and gene expression are associated with various diseases such as cancers, lymphoproliferative disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus [13], [14], [15], [16]. As for MS, putative epigenetic changes have been suggested to explain the gender bias, the low level concordance in homozygous twins, and the linkage to several genetic loci [17], [18].

Cell-free plasma DNA (cfpDNA) exists as heterogeneous polynucleotides in plasma of all humans. Lately, it has attracted attention as a disease biomarker because of its easy accessibility, established diagnostic value in genetic diseases, and utility for methylation analysis [19]. CfpDNA is believed to be released from proliferating, or dying cells, and to reflect the normal or abnormal turnover of cell populations, although its precise origins are still enigmatic [20]. CfpDNA concentration is found to be elevated in patients with trauma, cancer, inflammation, and stroke [21], [22], [23]. In MS, the utility of cfpDNA for biomarker development has not yet been evaluated. However, given the facts that MS is a disease of immune activation, central nervous system inflammation, oligodendrocyte and neuronal injury, and gliosis, one can hypothesize that the disease can induce changes in cfpDNA.

In this study, we analyzed cfpDNA in patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) and in healthy individuals. We found that cfpDNA in patients with RRMS displayed unique disease- and state-specific characteristics. Our findings are clinically relevant and suggest that cfpDNA might be useful for biomarker development for MS.

Section snippets

Patient enrollment and sample collection

The patients were prospectively enrolled in the study according to Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocols and after obtaining a signed consent specifying the goals of the study. Patient confidentiality was ensured by using a coding system that was non-descriptive of patient personal information. The enrollment inclusion criteria involved: 1) presence of RRMS with documented clinical duration for at least 2 years but less than 15 years; 2) presence of some level of neurological

Patient demographics

The aim of the study was to analyze methylation in cfpDNA of patients with RRMS and healthy individuals and to identify disease-specific methylation patterns. Enrolled patients with RRMS were divided into two groups according to their disease state, remission, RRMS(r), and exacerbation, RRMS(e). Healthy individuals used as controls were chosen to match the gender, age and the ethnic background of the MS patients. The age, gender, and ethnic compositions of the study groups (healthy individuals,

Discussion

Our experiments revealed that concentration of cfpDNA in RRMS patients was several-fold higher compared to healthy individuals and displayed unique disease- and state-specific gene promoter methylation patterns. Three patterns were identified — two of them distinguished RRMS patients, either in remission or in exacerbation, from healthy controls with sensitivities near 80% and specificities above 90%. The third one distinguished RRMS patients in exacerbation from those in remission with greater

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the NS060311 grant from NINDS (VL) and philanthropy to the Rush University MS Center (RB, DS). Authors are grateful to Melinda Kopec, R.N., Cynthia Dendrinos, R.N., Carmen Petrizzo, R.N. and Raquel Brillante, N.P., for their invaluable help with the collection of blood samples and clinical data. VL is grateful to Dr. John Flax (PrecisionMed, Inc.) for a subset of plasma samples, and to Dr. Joel Peek (Microarrays, Inc.) for printing microarrays and technical support

References (43)

  • M.S. Freedman et al.

    Recommended standard of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement

    Arch Neurol

    (2005)
  • K. Rejdak et al.

    Cerebrospinal fluid brain specific proteins in relation to nitric oxide metabolites during relapse of multiple sclerosis

    Mult Scler

    (2008)
  • J.N. Whitaker

    Myelin basic protein in cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluids

    Mult Scler

    (1998)
  • L.F. Barcellos et al.

    Heterogeneity at the HLA-DRB1 locus and risk for multiple sclerosis

    Hum Mol Genet

    (2006)
  • S.G. Gregory et al.

    Interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7R) shows allelic and functional association with multiple sclerosis

    Nat Genet

    (2007)
  • D.A. Hafler et al.

    Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • J.R. Oksenberg et al.

    The genetics of multiple sclerosis: SNPs to pathways to pathogenesis

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2008)
  • S.B. Baylin

    DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer

    Nat Clin Pract Oncol

    (2005)
  • J. Delgado

    Novel epigenetic targets in lymphoproliferative disorders

    Curr Cancer Drug Targets

    (2008)
  • F.M. Strickland et al.

    Epigenetics in human autoimmunity. Epigenetics in autoimmunity — DNA methylation in systemic lupus erythematosus and beyond

    Autoimmunity

    (2008)
  • P. Casaccia-Bonnefil et al.

    Evaluating epigenetic landmarks in the brain of multiple sclerosis patients: a contribution to the current debate on disease pathogenesis

    Prog Neurobiol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling identifies epigenetic changes in CD4+ and CD14+ cells of multiple sclerosis patients

      2022, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      DNA methylation may be affected by environmental triggers of MS, such as viral infections or smoking (Marabita et al., 2017; Niller et al., 2009), and thus these factors directly or indirectly contribute to the development of the pathological process (see more Celarain and Tomas-Roig 2020). Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in MS patients has been already performed in some brain tissues (frontal lobe and hippocampus) (Kular et al., 2019; Chomyk et al., 2017; Huynh et al., 2014), bronchoalveolar lavage cells (Ringh et al., 2020), in whole blood and sorted immune cells such as CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD14+ monocytes and CD19+ B cells (Fernandes et al., 2019; Ewing et al., 2019; Rhead et al., 2018; Graves et al., 2014; Kulakova et al., 2016; Kular et al., 2018; Liggett et al., 2010; Maltby et al., 2015, 2018a; Marabita et al., 2017; Ruhrmann et al., 2018). Among immune cells, CD4+ and CD8+ cells were analyzed more frequently since they are the most abundant cell populations and their participation in MS development and progression is reliably established.

    • Epigenetics, Stem Cells, Cellular Differentiation, and Associated Neurological Disorders and Brain Cancer

      2022, Handbook of Epigenetics: The New Molecular and Medical Genetics, Third Edition
    • INFβ treatment affects global DNA methylation in monocytes of patients with multiple sclerosis

      2021, Journal of Neuroimmunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Different studies demonstrated that patients with MS have different methylation patterns, higher methylation levels, and hypermethylation of various CpG-sites than healthy individuals (Sokratous et al., 2018; Kulakova et al., 2016). Also, hypermethylated Alu, LINE-1, and SATα repetitive elements were detected in MS compared to healthy controls (Neven et al., 2016), as well as changes in DNA methylation of various gene promoters and on circulating free cell DNA (cfpDNA) (Liggett et al., 2010). Recently, it has been demonstrated that DNA hypermethylation is associated with MS phenotypes, implying it could be used as a disease biomarker given its possible role in the pathogenesis of the disease (Kulakova et al., 2016; Fagone et al., 2016; Ewing et al., 2019).

    • Circulating cell-free DNA as potential diagnostic tools for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

      2021, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      The diagnostic potential of cfDNA methylation status has also been suggested, albeit not to the same extent as in cancer or diabetes, in a diverse range of neurodegenerative conditions. Notably, early work aimed at characterizing the methylation status of cfDNA in plasma samples obtained from patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) demonstrated different levels between samples from patients in remission or exacerbation versus samples from healthy individuals [58]. A significant increase in methylation of a sub-set of CpG sites in the promoter region of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) was identified in serum cfDNA of RRMS patients compared to healthy individuals [59].

    • Identifying the culprits in neurological autoimmune diseases

      2019, Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to the experimental design and the microarray work.

    View full text