Original Article
Intracorporeal Suturing: Economy of Instrument Movements Using a Box Trainer Model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.04.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Study Objective

To determine whether economy of instrument movement can differentiate between skills levels during intracorporeal suturing using a box trainer model.

Design

Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting

Skills laboratory of a university teaching hospital.

Subjects

Forty-two volunteers participated including 19 medical students without previous laparoscopic experience (novices), 12 residents in obstetrics and gynecology (intermediates), and 11 practitioners of intracorporeal suturing who had performed at least 200 laparoscopic procedures including advanced surgery (experts).

Interventions

Each participant performed 3 consecutive standardized intracorporeal sutures using a box trainer, and instrument movements were recorded using the TrEndo tracking device.

Measurements and Main Results

Time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness of the instrument tips were recorded. Performance in the 3 groups differed significantly (p <.001 for all parameters; Kruskal-Wallis test). Experts outperformed novices in all 4 parameters (p <.01; Bonferroni test).

Conclusion

The construct validity has been suggested for time, path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness for assessment of the laparoscopic suturing task using a box trainer. An expert level has been set for training and assessment purposes. The addition of economy of movement to time to complete the task has the potential to refine acquisition of skills.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Measurements were performed in the skills laboratory of Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands).

Results

In total, 19 novices, 12 intermediates, and 11 expert laparoscopic surgeons participated in the study. All 19 novices who had responded to the advertisement denied previous surgical experience and completed the entire study protocol of 3 trials. Of the 22 residents who received an e-mail, 12 agreed to participate in the study: 4 in PGY 1, 2 in PGY 2, 3 in PGY 3, 2 in PGY 4, and 1 in PGY 5. All completed the entire study protocol. Of the 11 participating laparoscopic experts, 4 were consultants

Discussion

This study confirmed the hypothesis that the 4 motion-analysis parameters are able to discriminate between groups with different levels of experience during an intracorporeal suturing task using a physical box trainer. This indicates the construct validity of these objective assessment parameters for psychomotor skills for intracorporeal suturing.

Although experts outperformed intermediates during the first and second trials for all parameters, no significant difference was present during the

Conclusion

The construct validity of time and 3 parameters of economy of movement (path length, motion in depth, and motion smoothness) have been strongly suggested for the intracorporeal suturing task performed using a box trainer. An expert standard has been set. Economy-of-movement parameters should be added to the assessment package to form a framework of specified feedback and to enable continuous refinement of psychomotor skills during training, and can be used for assessment and for certification

Acknowledgment

We thank the students, residents, gynecologists, and surgeons who participated in the study.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

  • Comparing Simulator Metrics and Rater Assessment of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills

    2023, Journal of Surgical Education
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, most of the novices were experienced in handling laparoscopic instruments (median number of independently performed procedures = 60) compared to if we had chosen, e.g. medical students with no laparoscopic experience and no prerequisites for achieving a more advanced laparoscopic task such as suturing. In addition to the laparoscopic experience, all participants had the opportunity of a warm-up session of a maximum of 45 minutes, which also gave the novices the benefit of a higher performance level compared to a setup where a warm-up session was not accessible.13,29-31 We expected that the novices would benefit from a warm-up session, leading to a higher score of the novices and thus demanding a more robust and more sensitive assessment tool to show a significant difference between novices and experienced.

  • Assessment of technical skills based on learning curve analyses in laparoscopic surgery training

    2021, Surgery (United States)
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recently, much effort was devoted to the development of performance parameters that reflect efficient and safe tissue interaction. For example, force exertion parameters (eg, MaxForce) indicate if tissue damage occurs during manipulation, and instrument motion parameters, such as “Path length” and “Volume of motion,” indicate any risk of unintended interaction with tissue out of the camera’s scope.11–17 Despite the development and validation of tools for objective assessment of technical skills acquisition over the past decades, structural implementation and adoption into surgical curricula are still lacking.

  • Performance assessment - The knowledge, skills and attitudes of surgical performance

    2020, Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    These include: in-built systems (i.e., the Toronto laparoscopic surgery simulator with motion-tracking capability),52 systems within a simulator (i.e., Pro- MISTM),53,54 or separate devices enabling flexible use (i.e., Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device, ICSAD).49,55 Motion tracking sensors can be attached to surgical instruments, to trocars in laparoscopic surgery, to the hand or head of the surgeon,50,56,57 and can be used to assess performance both on a simulator as well as in the operative field. Motion tracking analysis has been shown to be an objective and valid tool for assessing surgical skills in terms of precision and economy of movement (path length and number of hand movements).11,48,58

  • Intracorporeal knot tying in a box trainer: How proficient is in vitro evaluation in laparoscopic experts?

    2014, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
    Citation Excerpt :

    First, during acquisition of the first competencies in (laparoscopic) surgical skills, monitoring of virtual reality or box trainer results provides useful information about the proficiency gaining curve and differentiates skillful novices from less competent residents. However, after reaching the nebulously termed and ill-defined expert level, surgeons tend to not show significant improvement over multiple attempts on a box trainer [13]. Second, we imply that, for experts, single-task observations in box trainers lack the complexity of actual advanced laparoscopic surgery and therefore fail to mimic results of these complex procedures.

View all citing articles on Scopus

The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

View full text