The six golden rules to improve compliance in hand hygiene

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Improvement of compliance in hand hygiene is probably the most effective step in reducing the incidence of nosocomial infections (NI). But improvement of compliance is known to be complex. Six possibilities for improving compliance are available although some of them may be difficult to carry out. Rule 1: Select an alcohol-based hand rub which has a good skin tolerance and is acceptable to health care workers to use. This has been shown to improve compliance. Rule 2: The hand rub shall be easily available. Wall dispensers near the patient and pocket bottles may well help. Other possibilities should be assessed locally. Rule 3: Implement teaching and promotion of hand hygiene, which has been shown to be very effective. This is may be the most effective tool but will cost time and money. If money is a problem, rule 4 may be the solution. Rule 4: Create a hospital budget which covers all costs involved with preventable nosocomial infection. Combine it with the budget for hand hygiene products. Even a small number of prevented NI largely outweighs the cost of effective hand hygiene products. Rule 5: Get senior staff to set a good example in order to motivate junior staff, because negligence in hand hygiene appears to correlate with the number of professional years. Rule 6: Have the patient–staff ratio well balanced. It has been shown that staff shortage decreases hand hygiene compliance. Other factors may be important as well, but implementation of these 6 golden rules could be an effective step into the right direction.

Cited by (63)

  • Antimicrobial natural fibres

    2020, Handbook of Natural Fibres: Volume 2: Processing and Applications
  • Implementation of an innovative hands-on training to improve adherence to hygiene rules: A feasibility Study

    2016, Nurse Education Today
    Citation Excerpt :

    Observations to evaluate improvements in the real life setting on the wards also showed a significant increase of hand hygiene compliance for all instances of hand hygiene under observation (64.3% before vs. 79.2% after the intervention). These results are consistent with prior studies, which report that monitoring, feedback and implementation of teaching ‘on the job’ are effective tools in increasing hand hygiene adherence (Maskerine and Loeb, 2006; Benton, 2007; Naikoba and Hayward, 2001; Lent et al., 2009; Pittet et al., 2000; Kampf, 2004). The observations show differences in adherence to different tasks.

  • Usage of ultraviolet test method for monitoring the efficacy of surgical hand rub technique among medical students

    2015, Journal of Surgical Education
    Citation Excerpt :

    Our own experiences revealed the same, with female students having higher rate of perfect surgical hand rub. All authors agreed on the positive influence of previous education.9,10,23 We are of the same opinion, noticing the advance between the 2 tests (123 vs 65 students with mistakes).

  • Facilitators and barriers around teaching concepts of hand hygiene to undergraduate medical students

    2014, Journal of Hospital Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Further investigation into the factors that promote HH, including a review of the current teaching programme on handwashing, has also been recommended.18 Although the role of education in improving HH practices has been recognized as important, the role of different teaching and learning approaches has not been well examined in relation to medical students' HH compliance.19 Therefore the overall aim of this study was to examine the current practices in teaching HH at a large Australian medical school.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text