Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 71, Issue 3, September 2019, Pages 473-485
Journal of Hepatology

Research Article
Sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The present study summarizes the SVR rate in patients with/without liver cancer treated with all oral DAAs.

  • The cure rate was lower in patients with liver cancer, especially those with active cancer.

  • Additional controlled studies are needed to study the impact of liver cancer on HCV cure rate in DAA-treated patients.

Background & Aims

The effect of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the response to interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection remains unclear. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we aimed to investigate the effect of DAA therapy on sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients with CHC and either active, inactive or no HCC.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1/1/2013 to 9/24/2018. The pooled SVR rates were computed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models.

Results

We included 49 studies from 15 countries, comprised of 3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC. Overall, the pooled SVR was lower in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (89.6%, 95% CI 86.8–92.1%, I2= 79.1% vs. 93.3%, 95% CI 91.9–94.7%, I2= 95.0%, p = 0.0012), translating to a 4.8% (95% CI 0.2–7.4%) SVR reduction by meta-regression analysis. The largest SVR reduction (18.8%) occurred in patients with active/residual HCC vs. inactive/ablated HCC (SVR 73.1% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, patients with HCC who received a prior liver transplant had higher SVR rates than those who did not (p <0.001). Regarding specific DAA regimens, patients with HCC treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had lower SVR rates than patients without HCC (92.6%, n = 884 vs. 97.8%, n = 13,141, p = 0.026), but heterogeneity was high (I2 = 84.7%, p <0.001). The SVR rate was similar in patients with/without HCC who were treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir (n = 101) (97.2% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.79), or daclatasvir/asunaprevir (91.7% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.66).

Conclusion

Overall, SVR rates were lower in patients with HCC, especially with active HCC, compared to those without HCC, though heterogeneity was high. Continued efforts are needed to aggressively screen, diagnose, and treat HCC to ensure higher CHC cure rates.

Lay summary

There are now medications (direct-acting antivirals or “DAAs”) that can “cure” hepatitis C virus, but patients with hepatitis C and liver cancer may be less likely to achieve cure than those without liver cancer. However, patients with liver cancer are also more likely to have advanced liver disease and risk factors that can decrease cure rates, so better controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Introduction

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affected an estimated 71.1 million patients worldwide in 2015 and is a leading cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1 Among patients who have undergone treatment with curative intent for HCC, early hepatic decompensation and HCC recurrence were the major drivers of mortality.2 In recent studies of chronic hepatitis B-related HCC, antiviral therapy was shown to significantly reduce overall long-term mortality even in patients with very advanced HCC or decompensated cirrhosis, including those who were only receiving palliative treatment for HCC.[3], [4], [5], [6] Prior to the advent of interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, patients with HCV-related HCC were often excluded from anti-HCV therapy as they tended to be older and had multiple non-liver and liver comorbidities, many of which rendered them unsuitable candidates for IFN-based therapy. Since 2014, many of these patients with HCC became treatment candidates for their chronic hepatitis C (CHC), despite the presence of advanced liver disease and comorbidities, as DAA therapy is not only highly efficacious but well tolerated.7 Individual real-world studies to date have included patients with HCC from both the East and West, and some have reported significantly lower cure rates.[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] However, most studies had small sample sizes and heterogeneous patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of HCC on cure rates in DAA-treated patients with CHC, taking into account various viral, host and tumor factors.

Section snippets

Search strategy and selection criteria

This study was performed based on a pre-defined and registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42017079155). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published from January 1, 2013 to September 24, 2018 without language restrictions. The search strategy, developed by a medical librarian (MBB), included (“direct-acting antiviral” OR “DAA”) AND (“hepatocellular carcinoma” OR “HCC” OR “carcinoma, hepatocellular” OR “liver

Results

Of the 6,249 citations identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Databases, and an additional 44 studies identified via manual bibliography review, 49 full-text studies, comprising 3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]

Discussion

In this study, we pooled 49 articles (3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC) and compared the pooled SVR rates in patients with or without HCC. To determine the source of heterogeneity and obtain more clinically relevant data, we categorized patients by several viral and host factors (e.g. HCV GT, HCC activity, prior HCV treatment status, presence of cirrhosis) as well as types of DAA treatment and study location to assess predictors for the lower SVR rates seen in patients with HCC

Financial support

The authors received no financial support to produce this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Yee Hui Yeo, Mike Tzuhen Wei, Eiichi Ogawa, Masaru Enomoto, Dong Hyun Lee, Etsuko Iio, Wenjun Wang, Bin Wei, Tatsuya Ide, Michelle B Bass, Carmen Monica Preda, Fabio Conti, Rob Bielen, Hitomi Sezaki, Michele Barone, Po-sung Chu, Victor Virlogeux, Dennis Eurich, Takanori Kanai, Shuangsuo Dang, Zongfang Li, Akihiro Tamori: None to disclose. Fanpu Ji: Speaker Gilead Sciences, MSD and Ascletis. John Lubel: Research support (Institutional support only) Abbvie, BMS, MSD; consulting/advisory board

Authors’ contribution

All authors: Data contribution, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript for important content. FPJ, MTW, BW, YHY, MBB: Literature search and data extraction. FPJ, YHY, EO, ME, DHL, WJW, MB, SSD, ZFL, AT: Study quality assessment. FPJ, YHY, MTW, MHN: Study design and data analysis. FPJ, YHY, MHN: Drafting of the manuscript. MTW, MB, LH, RC: Critical revision of the paper. MHN: Study conception and study supervision.

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Dr. Guido Schwarzer, PhD for his kind guidance with the R-programming for our meta-regression analysis.

References (82)

  • M. Reig et al.

    Unexpected high rate of early tumor recurrence in patients with HCV-related HCC undergoing interferon-free therapy

    J Hepatol

    (2016)
  • R. Bielen et al.

    Belgian experience with direct acting antivirals in people who inject drugs

    Drug Alcohol Depend

    (2017)
  • P. Kolly et al.

    Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after direct antiviral agent treatment: a European multicentre study

    J Hepatol

    (2017)
  • B. Al-Judaibi et al.

    Sofosbuvir-based therapy in the pre-liver transplant setting: The Canadian national experience

    Ann Hepatol

    (2018)
  • S. Fangazio et al.

    Treatment failure after interferon-free treatment of hepatitis C as a clue of a yet undetected hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Hepatol

    (2018)
  • D. Erard-Poinsot et al.

    Very late relapse of hepatitis C virus infection immediately after liver transplantation

    Am J Transplant

    (2018)
  • E.J. Gane et al.

    Efficacy of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and GS-9857 in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2, 3, 4, or 6 infections in an open-label, phase 2 trial

    Gastroenterology

    (2016)
  • C. Hezode et al.

    Resistance analysis in patients with genotype 1–6 HCV infection treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in the phase III studies

    J Hepatol

    (2018)
  • P.Y. Kwo et al.

    Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir yield high response rates in patients with HCV genotype 1–6 without cirrhosis

    J Hepatol

    (2017)
  • M. Puoti et al.

    High SVR12 with 8-week and 12-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir: integrated analysis of HCV genotype 1–6 patients without cirrhosis

    J Hepatol

    (2018)
  • E. Lawitz et al.

    Safety and efficacy of a fixed-dose combination regimen of grazoprevir, ruzasvir, and uprifosbuvir with or without ribavirin in participants with and without cirrhosis with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1, 2, or 3 infection (C-CREST-1 and C-CREST-2, part B): two randomised, phase 2, open-label trials

    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2017)
  • Polaris Observatory HCV Collaborators

    Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modelling study

    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2017)
  • C.C. Chong et al.

    Antiviral therapy improves post-hepatectomy survival in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective-retrospective study

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2015)
  • S.L. Chan et al.

    Use of antiviral therapy in surveillance: impact on outcome of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma

    Liver Int

    (2012)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    A high baseline HBV load and antiviral therapy affect the survival of patients with advanced HBV-related HCC treated with sorafenib

    Liver Int

    (2015)
  • V.L. Chen et al.

    Anti-viral therapy is associated with improved survival but is underutilised in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: real-world east and west experience

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2018)
  • European Association for the Study of the Liver

    EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2018

    J Hepatol

    (2018)
  • B. Saberi et al.

    Challenges in treatment of hepatitis C among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatology

    (2017)
  • M. Persico et al.

    High efficacy of direct-acting anti-viral agents in hepatitis C virus-infected cirrhotic patients with successfully treated hepatocellular carcinoma

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2018)
  • C.Y. Chang et al.

    Real-world experience with interferon-free, direct acting antiviral therapies in Asian Americans with chronic hepatitis C and advanced liver disease

    Medicine

    (2017)
  • F. Ji et al.

    Systematic review with meta-analysis: effectiveness and tolerability of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral regimens for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 in routine clinical practice in Asia

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2018)
  • F. Ji et al.

    Hepatocellular carcinoma decreases the effectiveness of hepatitis C antiviral treatment: do direct-acting antiviral regimens matter?

    Hepatology

    (2018)
  • D.F. Stroup et al.

    Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    Ann Intern Med

    (2009)
  • A. Liberati et al.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

    PLoS Med

    (2009)
  • Wells GA, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the...
  • V.N. Nyaga et al.

    Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data

    Arch Public Health

    (2014)
  • J.L. Peters et al.

    Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • G. Schwarzer

    Meta: an R package for meta-analysis

    R News

    (2007)
  • W. Hadley et al.

    ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis

    (2009)
  • Cited by (68)

    • The impact of COVID-19 on the cascade of care of HCV in the US and China

      2022, Annals of Hepatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      No true solutions have been found so far as updated data are lacking and the problem is still evolving. The direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is associated with high sustained virological response (SVR), lower risk of advanced liver diseases, and significant increased survival rate of HCC patients [9–13]. Therefore, the emphasis of viral elimination has shifted from pursuing curative armamentarium to establishing a coordinated public health approach to effective screening and treating individuals with HCV infection [14].

    • Direct-acting antiviral agents and risk of Hepatocellular carcinoma: Critical appraisal of the evidence

      2022, Annals of Hepatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the difference of SVR rates among patients with or without HCC was not statistically significant, suggesting that HCC status does not influence the likelihood to obtain SVR with DAAs. A recent meta-analysis[37] explored the effect of HCC on cure rates in DAA-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C. After pooling 49 articles and categorizing patients by several viral and host factors, it has been found that the overall SVR rate among patients with HCC was lower than in those without HCC, the former having a 4.8% reduction in SVR rate (95% CI 0.2-7.4), compared to the latter.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    #

    These 2 authors contributed equally to the work.

    View full text