Elsevier

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volume 192, Issue 3, 15 September 2011, Pages 1437-1440
Journal of Hazardous Materials

Synthesis of calcium peroxide nanoparticles as an innovative reagent for in situ chemical oxidation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.060Get rights and content

Abstract

Chemical oxidation is one of the many different methods of site remediation that has emerged lately as an alternative method to traditional techniques. According to this research calcium peroxide is suitable choice for contaminant biodegradation in soil and ground water but speed of oxidation reaction between calcium peroxide and contaminant is slow. Synthesis of calcium peroxide in nano size by increased ratio of surface to volume can increase the speed of reaction and solve the problem. We have developed a simple surface modification technique to avoid irreversible agglomeration of calcium peroxide nanoparticles. The technique is based on hydrolysis–precipitation procedure, using CaCl2 as a precursor. Polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG200) is used as a surface modifier. CaO2 was identified and studied by characterization techniques, including XRD and TEM. The results indicate the ability of this method for synthesis of new reagent in nano size and improve quality of in situ chemical oxidation. Size determination by TEM image indicates the size of calcium peroxide nanoparticles approximately 15–25 nm.

Highlights

► We introduce CaO2 nanoparticles as an efficient for in situ chemical oxidation reactions. ► Oxygen releasing rate of calcium peroxide in the nano size will increase comparison of CaO2. ► Because of the stabilizer material used in this process is recyclable, this process has a high economic justification.

Introduction

In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) is based on the delivery of chemical oxidants to contaminated media in order to either destroy the contaminants by converting them to innocuous compounds commonly found in nature. ISCO is being used for ground water, sediment, and soil remediation. It can be applied to a variety of soil types and sizes (silt and clay). Chemical oxidation has been shown to be effective at the destruction of the dissolved phase of non-aqueous phase liquids, which are known to be difficult to remediate through other tactics. Therefore, if administered correctly, ISCO has the potential to be a low-cost, fast, effective, and relatively low maintenance remediation technology [1].

The four main species used today in ISCO industry are permanganate, persulfate, hydrogen peroxide, and calcium peroxide. The characteristics of four main species used in ISCO are given in Table 1. Permanganate is frequently sold in the form of the salt potassium permanganate. It is a well-known and widely used oxidant in ISCO [2], [3], with a few benefits and limitations. The most well-known limitations of permanganate are that it has a long half-life. This long half-life is that permanganate is a less powerful oxidative species [4].

Persulfate is frequently sold in the form of the salt sodium persulfate, Na2S2O8, and is in many ways similar to permanganate. Persulfate does suffer from the fact that it generates sulfate during cleanup, which has a secondary maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). This MCL is much higher than the MCL for manganese: 250 mg/L for sulfate, as opposed to 0.05 mg/L for manganese. Persulfate, like permanganate, also has been shown to have little impact on naturally occurring bacteria colonies, and therefore should not inhibit bioremediation to any significant degree [4].

Hydrogen peroxide is the oxygen source most commonly used to ISCO for bioremediation applications. Hydrogen peroxide decomposes to form molecular oxygen and water in the presence of catalase (an enzyme found in aerobic microorganisms. and certain abiotic catalysts) [5]. Virtually all aerobic microorganisms produce catalase [6]. Hydrogen peroxide can be effective in promoting contaminant biodegradation in soil [7], [8], but is readily scavenged by metals and humic substances. This results in rapid exhaustion of the oxygen source [9]. Oxygen released at a rate greater than by which it can be consumed by microorganisms escapes unused via volatilization or dissolved in groundwater. Furthermore, hydrogen peroxide can be toxic at concentrations required to achieve biological treatment [7], [9].

Recent studies suggest that calcium peroxide (CaO2) is a more effective source of H2O2 for ISCO than liquid H2O2 [10], [11]. CaO2 dissolves to form H2O2 and Ca(OH)2, liberating a maximum of 0.47 g H2O2/g CaO2 [12]. The advantage is that the released H2O2 is auto-regulated by the rate of CaO2 dissolution, reducing disproportionation since not all the H2O2 is available at once as with liquid H2O2. Ndjou’ou and Cassidy compared the treatment of a soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons using a commercially available CaO2-based oxidant and liquid H2O2 at pH of 8. CaO2 removed 96% of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), compared with 74% using liquid H2O2 [11]. Several studies have reported that addition of calcium peroxide in saturated soil and ground water is suitable choice for contaminant degradation [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. But the rate of the oxidation reaction between calcium peroxide and contaminant is slow. Synthesis of calcium peroxide in nano size can increase the ratio of surface to volume, so increase the speed of reaction and solve the problem [22].

The aim of our work is development of a simple surface modification technique to avoid irreversible agglomeration of calcium peroxide nanoparticles. The technique is based on hydrolysis–precipitation procedure, using CaCl2 as a precursor. Polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG200) is used as a surface modifier. CaO2 was identified and studied by a variety of characterization techniques, including XRD and TEM. The result indicates the ability of this method for synthesis of new Fenton reagent in nano size and improve quality of in situ chemical oxidation. Size determination by TEM image indicate the size of calcium peroxide nanoparticles is approximately 15–25 nm.

Section snippets

Materials

Calcium chloride (Merck, 99.5%); hydrogen peroxide aqueous solution H2O2 (Merck, 35%); PEG 200, H(OCH2CH2)nOH (Fluka), ammonia (Merck, 25%), silver nanoparticles (NANOPAC PERSIA Co.) and sodium hydroxide, NaOH (Merck) were used in their commercial forms.

Preparation of CaO2 nanoparticle solution

Three grams of calcium chloride was dissolved in 30 mL distilled water, 15 mL ammonia solution (1 M) and one 120 mL of PEG 200 was added to the stirring mixture. Then 15 mL of 30% H2O2 was added to the mixture by rate of 3 drops per minute. The

Characterization of the CaO2 nanoparticles

There are two general methods for synthesizing peroxides [23]. The first involves heating the oxide in a stream of pure, CO2-free dry oxygen. This method is favored for making peroxides that are considerably more stable than the corresponding oxide, for example, for the preparation of BaO2. In fact, BaO2 is commercially made by heating BaO at 500 °C in flowing, pure oxygen. The synthesis of the less stable SrO2 requires more drastic conditions, namely heating the oxide at a temperature of 350 °C

Conclusion

Stabilized nanoparticles of calcium peroxide were formed by an improved and simple technique. The process is spontaneous and no additional equipment or energy source is required. The calcium peroxide preparation method is based on oxidation–hydrolysis–precipitation procedure, with polyethylene glycol 200 as a surface modifier. Pure, stabilized nanoparticles of calcium peroxide remained in the nano-scale during all stages.

References (26)

  • W.C. Schumb et al.

    Hydrogen Peroxide

    (1955)
  • R.M. Atlas et al.

    Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications

    (1998)
  • M.M. Joshi et al.

    Effect of oxygen amendments and soil pH on bioremediation of industrially contaminated soils

    Energy Sources

    (1996)
  • Cited by (120)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text