Integration of standardized environmental and quality management systems audits
Highlights
► Based on Management Systems (MS) integration literature, we explore how companies conduct their audits. ► The case analysis detailed in this paper shows that MS audits have reached a very high level of integration. ► It uncovers some of the benefits of having integrated audit systems. ► Some challenges regarding the process of audit integration are also outlined.
Introduction
The implementation of Management System Standards (MSSs), for example ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 (see ISO, 2010), has increased in recent years. The proliferation of new MSSs, such as the ones for occupational health and safety (e.g., OHSAS 18001 and CSA Z1000), for corporate social responsibility and accountability (e.g., SA 8000 and AA 1000), for security of information systems (ISO 27001) or for supply chains (ISO 28000), gives the option that firms integrate the corresponding Management Systems (MSs) into a single system (Labodová, 2004, Zutshi and Sohal, 2005).
Many studies exist about the integration of standardized MSs. These studies focus on different topics, such as the integration advantages, methodologies, and degrees (see, for example, Karapetrovic and Willborn, 1998a, Karapetrovic, 2003, Zeng et al., 2007, Bernardo et al., 2009, Khanna et al., 2010, López-Fresno, 2010, Asif et al., 2010, Leopoulos et al., 2010). However, little empirical research has been done on how organizations that integrated their standardized MSs actually carry out their audit process.
Organizations with more than one implemented MS can integrate the audits against the corresponding MSSs (Karapetrovic and Willborn, 2001, Karapetrovic and Jonker, 2003, Power and Terziovski, 2005, Kraus and Grosskopf, 2008, Bernardo et al., 2010). Guidance on the process of MS auditing is currently provided by ISO 19011 (ISO, 2002). The standard explains “the principles of management system auditing and offers advice on evaluating auditors and assessing their competence, guidance on managing audit programs, and guidance on conducting internal and external audits” (Kraus and Grosskopf, 2008). This standard is currently under revision in order to provide more generic guidance and allow auditing of all standardized MSs (ISO, 2008).
There are a limited number of empirical studies regarding the integration of MS audits (e.g., Karapetrovic et al., 2006, Salomone, 2008, Kraus and Grosskopf, 2008, Bernardo et al., 2010). Therefore, the objective of this research is to study how firms with more than one standardized MS conduct the audits and to which extent they integrate the audit elements in order to profit from the advantages of having a sole, integrated audit system.
Section snippets
Literature review and propositions development
Since audit integration is the main topic of this paper, it is important to define some relevant concepts related to the auditing of standardized MSs. An ‘audit’ is defined in ISO 19011: 2002 and in the ISO 9000: 2005 vocabulary standard as a ‘systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which audit criteria are fulfilled’ (ISO, 2002, ISO, 2005).
It is also important to explain what an integrated audit means.
Methodology
This research involves detailed case studies of four specific organizations. The objective is to study how these companies conduct their audits and to which extent they integrate specific elements of their MS audits.
This qualitative approach is often used in the analysis of processes within organizations, because the main goal is to know what the managers’ point of view is (Eisenhardt, 1989).
A case study approach has been adopted “to allow causes, processes and consequences of behavior to be
Findings
The data analysis reveals responses regarding the conduct of internal and external audits, and it is particularly focused on the main elements of the audit system, i.e., audit processes, including the corresponding input (audit plan) and output (audit report), and audit resources (Karapetrovic and Willborn, 2000).
This study also reveals different combinations of audit elements, such as the people, the processes involved or the audit plans and reports, which can lead to different levels of
Conclusions
This research has addressed, in an exploratory way, the question of how firms with more than one standardized MS conduct the audits and to which extent they integrate the audit elements in order to profit from the advantages of having a sole, integrated audit system. In order to answer this question, one of the first empirical studies on the integration of MSs audits was undertaken, with four detailed case studies.
In the first place, this research confirms the notion that firms with more than
Acknowledgements
This article has been written as part of a project entitled ‘‘Mejora de la satisfacción de los clientes en las empresas españolas mediante modelos y estándares de gestión de la calidad’’ (ECO2009-12754-C02-01) financed by the Ministry of Science and Innovation within the aid program for R & D and as a part of the aid Program for the Formation of University Researchers.
References (39)
- et al.
How integrated are environmental, quality and other standardized management systems? an empirical study
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2009) - et al.
An empirical study on the integration of management system audits
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2010) - et al.
Implementing environmental with other standardized management systems: scope, sequence, time and integration
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2009) Implementing integrated management systems using a risk analysis based approach
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2004)Integrated management systems: experiences in Italian organizations
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2008)- et al.
Towards implementation of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in selected industries in China
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2005) - et al.
A synergetic model for implementing an integrated management system: an empirical study in China
Journal of Cleaner Production
(2007) - et al.
An examination of strategies employed for the integration of management systems
The TQM Journal
(2010) Management System Mergers
(1999)- et al.
Third party assessment: the role of the maintenance function in an integrated management system
Journal of Quality Maintenance Engineering
(2004)
Integration of management systems: focus on safety in the nuclear industry
International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
Audit Management and Supervision
Integrated management systems in small and medium enterprises
Total Quality Management
Building theories from case study research
The Academy of Management Review
The “What” and the “How” of case study rigor: three strategies based on published work
Organizational Research Methods
Los estándares internacionales de sistemas de gestión: pasado, presente y futuro
Boletín ICE – Revista del Ministerio de Industria, Turismo Y Comercio
ISO 19011. International Standard: guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing
ISO 9000. International Standard: Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary
Cited by (98)
A novel Integrated Risk Management Method for Airport operations
2022, Journal of Air Transport ManagementItem response theory-based validation of an integrated management system measurement instrument
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionTechnology-enhanced auditing: Improving veracity and timeliness in social and environmental audits of supply chains
2020, Journal of Cleaner ProductionA meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises
2024, Production Planning and ControlThe Effects of Auditors' Quality and Peripheral Services on Client-Firms' Satisfaction in ISO 9001 Quality System Auditing
2024, IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementRisk-Based Approach in the Implementation of Integrated Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
2023, Sustainability (Switzerland)