Synthesis, characterization, and visible light activity of new nanoparticle photocatalysts based on silver, carbon, and sulfur-doped TiO2

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

New nanoparticle photocatalysts based on silver, carbon, and sulfur-doped TiO2 having only the homogeneous anatase crystalline phase and high surface area were successfully synthesized by a modified sol–gel route. The catalysts were characterized by EDX, XRD, BET, UV–vis, IR, and Raman spectroscopy. The effects of the experimental parameters on the visible light reactivity of the catalysts were evaluated for the photodegradation of gaseous acetaldehyde as a model indoor pollutant. The activity results show that the silver(I) ion, Ag+, doping significantly promotes the visible light reactivities of carbon and sulfur-doped TiO2 catalysts without any phase transformation from anatase to rutile. Moreover, Ag/(C, S)–TiO2 photocatalysts degrade acetaldehyde 10 times faster in visible light and 3 times faster in UV light illuminations than the accredited photocatalyst P25–TiO2. The commendable visible photoactivities of Ag/(C, S)–TiO2 new nanoparticle photocatalysts are predominantly attributable to an improvement in anatase crystallinity, high surface area, low band gap and nature of precursor materials used.

Graphical abstract

New nanoparticle photocatalysts based on silver, carbon, and sulfur-doped titania (Ag/(C, S)–TiO2) degrade efficiently gaseous acetaldehyde under (a) visible and (b) UV light.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

The phenomenon of photocatalysis is defined as the combination of photochemistry and catalysis. More precisely, the term “photocatalysis” herein implies that the light and a catalyst are essential to enhance the rates of thermodynamically favored but kinetically slow photophysical and photochemical transformations. Indeed, photocatalysis emerged as a new scientific area when Fujishima and Honda carried out photolysis of water into environmentally clean fuels (hydrogen and oxygen) using a titanium dioxide electrode in an electrochemical cell [1]. Ever since, heterogeneous photocatalysis by means of TiO2 has been widely accepted and exploited as an efficient technology for killing bacteria and degrading organic and inorganic pollutants [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Moreover, titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been regarded as an excellent semiconductor photocatalyst because of its performance, low cost, nontoxicity, stability, and availability. Unfortunately, because of its wide band gap (anatase: 3.2 eV; rutile: 3.0 eV), the extensive exploitation of TiO2 created an expectation to use merely 3–4% UV light of the whole radiant solar energy.

Fortunately, there are, however, a number of empirical ways to design and develop a second generation of visible-light-sensitive photocatalysts of titanium dioxide by means of physical and chemical processes [14], [15]. Of the various processes cited in the literature, ion implantation methods require more expensive and more sophisticated equipment, whereas chemical methods are more economical and can be conducted at or near ambient temperatures. In context, a great deal of effort has shown that doping with transition metals, such as Cr, Co, V, and Fe, extends the spectral response of TiO2 well into the visible region and enhances the photoreactivity [16], [17], [18], [19]. However, transition metal ion-doped TiO2 suffers from some serious drawbacks, such as thermal instability and low quantum efficiency of the photoinduced charge carriers (electron–hole pairs) [20]. Besides metal ion-doped TiO2 systems, there are numerous recent reports on nonmetal-doped TiO2, for example, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur and fluorine doped photocatalysts [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]. Basically, doping with carbon, nitrogen and sulfur effectively narrows the band gap of TiO2 (<3.0 eV) [34], [35], [36]. Moreover, band gap narrowing emanates from the electronic perturbations caused by change of the lattice parameters and/or the presence of the trap states within conduction and valence bands of TiO2. Consequently, the photons of lower energy (λ>420nm) can induce electron–hole pairs in TiO2. These photoinduced electrons and holes, which are in fact very powerful reducing and oxidizing agents, migrate to the surface of TiO2 and eventually become available for direct or indirect consecutive reduction and oxidation reactions. Furthermore, because of the presence some trap states within the band gap of titanium dioxide, the lifetime of the so-called photoinduced charge-carriers increases in such a way that it predominates over the fast charge-recombination process, thereby resulting in an enhanced visible light reactivity.

Apart from doping TiO2 with a single metal or nonmetal, it is highly anticipated that doping TiO2 with an appropriate combination of metals and/or nonmetals would, of course, result in more visible light sensitive photocatalysts for a desired application. In this context, Li et al. synthesized N–F-codoped TiO2 photocatalysts by spray pyrolysis (SP) using TiCl3 and NH4F precursors and observed an enhanced photoreactivity of the materials in visible light [37]. Luo et al. prepared a Br and Cl-codoped TiO2 system and demonstrated the efficiency of the material for photocatalytic splitting of water into H2 and O2 in the presence of Pt co-catalyst and UV light irradiation [38]. These recent efforts and strategies have revealed that codoping TiO2 with a metal and a nonmetal can result in the development of additional visible active photocatalysts [39], [40], [41].

It is well known that noble metals such as Ag, Au, and Pt possess unique electronic and catalytic properties. For example, Li reported that Au3+-doped TiO2 exhibited visible light reactivity for the photodegradation of methylene blue [42]. Likewise, Kim et al. prepared Pt ion-doped TiO2, and examined its visible light activity for the photodegradation of chlorinated organic compounds [43]. From an economic viewpoint, gold and platinum are very expensive and unaffordable metals for extensive use in photocatalysis. Compared to gold and platinum, silver is a more affordable metal and deserves further investigation. Munevver et al. reported a Ag–TiO2 system for killing E. coli under UV light illumination [44]. There have been some reports on the preparation of Ag+-doped TiO2 films and nanoparticles that degrade some textile dyes (methyl orange, crystal violet, and methyl red) in aqueous medium [45], [46], [47]. Furthermore, silver halides, such as AgBr/SiO2 and AgCl catalysts, have also been used in photocatalysis [48], [49]. It appears that doping with Ag+ ions makes a dramatic improvement in the performance of TiO2 photocatalysts; however, the aforementioned silver based photocatalysts function only under UV light. Earlier, researchers in our group have reported the synthesis and characterization of some nanocrystalline metal oxides and mixed metal oxides. It was discovered that materials in the nano-size domain exhibit a unique surface chemical reactivity for the destructive absorption of acid gas and chemical warfare agents [50], [51]. Moreover, this unique surface reactivity of nanomaterials was attributed to the high surface areas and the presence of defects, edges, and corners.

Therefore, it is rationally more desirable to synthesize new nanoparticle visible-light-driven photocatalysts based on silver, carbon and/or sulfur-doped TiO2. To accomplish the desired work, a quest for a suitable precursor material seems indispensable for carbon and sulfur dopants. On this line of research, Park et al. prepared carbon-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays at an elevated temperature range 500–800 °C by using carbon monoxide precursor, and tangibly demonstrated the catalytic efficiency of the C-doped TiO2 nanotubes for water splitting under visible light irradiation [52]. Further, Choi et al. fabricated C-doped TiO2 photocatalysts by oxidative annealing of TiC and ended up with the conclusion that C-doped TiO2 powder exhibited superior photoactivity for the photodecomposition of methylene blue and water under UV light [53]. Thus, carbon monoxide can be used, but it is rather dangerous and is not a suitable precursor for carbon dopant on a large-scale synthesis. Also, oxidative annealing of TiC requires hundreds of hours or progressively very high temperatures (600–750 °C) for optimal activity of the materials and such a high temperature synthesis results in materials inclusive of anatase–rutile phases and lower surface areas, thereby making them less worthwhile for photocatalysis. We thus realize, in essence, the need for a more suitable precursor for carbon and sulfur dopants other than TiC, CO, and NH2CSNH2. Herein, we express a strong preference for carbon and sulfur as nonmetal dopants, because these elements can stabilize Ag+ ions in doped TiO2 systems. Moreover, the well-dispersed Ag+ ions trap photoinduced electrons, leading to a substantial increase in electron–hole separation and a concomitant decrease in charge-carrier recombination.

To the best of our knowledge, there has been no publication on the synthesis of a silver, carbon and sulfur-doped TiO2 system and its photocatalytic performance in visible light. In this article, we report Ag/(C, S)-doped TiO2 photocatalysts and the structural and photocatalytic properties of these new nanoparticle photocatalysts. The photoreactivity of the synthesized materials was evaluated for the degradation of gaseous acetaldehyde (a major indoor pollutant) under UV and visible light.

Section snippets

Materials required

Ethanol (Absolute, 200 Proof, Aaper Alcohol and Chemical Co.), titanium(IV) isopropoxide (97%, Sigma–Aldrich), ammonium thiocyanate (97.5%, Alfa Aesar), thiourea (99%, Alfa Aesar), silver nitrate (99.9+%, Alfa Aesar), and ammonium hydroxide (29.9%, Fisher) were used as received without further purification.

Catalyst synthesis

Herein, we chose two different nonmetal precursors, ammonium thiocyanate (hereafter the samples are designated as –01) and thiourea (hereafter the samples are designated as –02) to elucidate

Characterization

Table 1 shows the EDXA measurements of the doped TiO2 samples annealed at 500 °C/2 h in air. It is worthwhile to note that both carbon (5.5 atm%) and sulfur (1.7 atm%) were simultaneously incorporated into TiO2 from NH4SCN precursor, whereas only sulfur (1.6 atm%) could be incorporated into TiO2 from NH2CSNH2. Besides carbon and sulfur, no nitrogen and hydrogen were detected in energy dispersive X-ray analysis spectrum (EDXA).

The simultaneous incorporation of carbon and sulfur from the NH4SCN

Conclusions

For the first time, we report the synthesis and characterization of highly active (in visible light) new nanoparticle photocatalysts based on silver, carbon and sulfur-doped TiO2. XRD and the BET measurements corroborate that these doped materials are made up of the homogeneous anatase crystalline phase and have high surface areas. Furthermore, the UV–vis absorption spectra substantiate the band gap tapering of TiO2 by the doped carbon and/or sulfur along with a very little contribution from

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Army Research Office and National Science Foundation for partial support for the current work. For the XPS measurement, we are also thankful to Dr. Hohn, Keith L. and Chundi, Department of Chemical Engineering, Kansas State University.

References (64)

  • H. Einaga et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2002)
  • M. Anpo et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2003)
  • M. Iwasaki et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2000)
  • J. Zhu et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A

    (2006)
  • D. Li et al.

    J. Fluorin. Chem.

    (2005)
  • M. Sokmen et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A

    (2001)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2003)
  • K.Y. Jung et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A

    (2005)
  • M. Kang et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A

    (2005)
  • Yu.V. Kolen'ko et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2004)
  • A. Fujishima et al.

    Nature

    (1972)
  • P.-C. Maness et al.

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • T.L. Thomson et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2004)
  • L. Hongmin et al.

    Chemosphere

    (2005)
  • M.D. Driessen et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (1998)
  • J. Zhuang et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (1999)
  • G.T. Brown et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1984)
  • C.N. Rusu et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2000)
  • M. Stylidi et al.

    Int. J. Photoenergy

    (2003)
  • C.N. Rusu et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2000)
  • C.N. Rusu et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2001)
  • H. Lee et al.

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2002)
  • H. Yamashita et al.

    Encyclopedia Nanosci. Nanotechnol.

    (2004)
  • E. Borgarello et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1982)
  • S. Klosek et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2001)
  • W. Choi et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (1994)
  • H. Irie et al.

    Chem. Lett.

    (2003)
  • S. Sakthivel et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2003)
  • R. Asahi et al.

    Science

    (2001)
  • C. Burda et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2003)
  • Y. Kuroda et al.

    Langmuir

    (2005)
  • L. Lin et al.

    Chem. Lett.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (283)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text