Empirical Research
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group for treatment-resistant participants: A randomized controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.04.005Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Group-based ACT and CBT-based TAU for treatment-resistant clients were compared.

  • Both ACT and CBT-based TAU improved depression in clients post-intervention.

  • Only ACT maintained the improvements in depression at 6-month follow-up.

  • Both ACT and CBT-TAU reduced distress and improved quality of life at follow-up.

  • ACT theory consistent process was predictive of change at 6-month follow-up in ACT.

Abstract

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a theoretically coherent approach addressing common processes across a range of disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a group-based ACT intervention for “treatment-resistant” participants with various diagnoses, who had already completed at least one psychosocial intervention. Of 61 individuals randomized into a service-based trial comparing ACT and Treatment as Usual based on Cognitive Behavior Therapy (TAU-CBT), 45 provided data (ACT n=26; TAU-CBT n=19). Primary outcomes were measures of psychological symptoms. All participants showed reduced symptoms immediately after intervention but improvements were more completely sustained in the ACT group at 6-month follow-up. More elaborate and more fully controlled evaluations are required to confirm the findings, improve understanding of ACT processes and assess health economic benefits.

Keywords

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Personality disorders
Treatment-resistant cases
Mindfulness

Cited by (0)