Brief report
Symptom structure of acute mania: A factor study of the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in a national sample of patients hospitalized for a manic episode

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.09.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Despite increasing interest in dimensional psychopathology and the use of symptom clusters in clinical research, factor analytic studies of mania are rare. Most studies included not only manic patients, but also patients with a mixed episode or other severe mental disorders. We aimed at further elucidating the symptom structure of manic states.

Methods

As part of a national survey of acute psychiatric inpatient care, all patients admitted to a random sample of Italian public and private facilities during an index period underwent a standardized assessment, including the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-24). Eighty-eight patients (90% of all manic patients admitted) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of Bipolar Affective Disorder, Current Episode Manic with complete data were included in this study. Principal axis factor analysis with Varimax rotation was performed on BPRS-24 items.

Results

Four factors were extracted, explaining 51% of total variance. They were interpreted as Mania, Disorganization, Positive Symptoms, and Dysphoria. The distribution of the Disorganization factor was positively skewed, with most patients relatively free from disorganization symptoms and some patients showing varying degrees of severity.

Limitations

The sample size was relatively small; also, patients were not administered a structured diagnostic interview. However, reasonably large samples are usually sufficient when communalities are high. Also, the manic episode is a clear-cut diagnostic entity easily identified by experienced clinicians, and the independent BPRS-24 ratings corroborated the diagnosis.

Conclusions

The identification of a Mania, Positive Symptoms, and Dysphoria factor is consistent with most previous studies. The identification of a Disorganization factor in a sample including only manic patients is a new finding that may have clinical implications, as its distribution suggests the possibility of distinguishing two patient groups, which may require different interventions to achieve optimal therapeutic response. The factorially derived BPRS-24 subscales may be useful for evaluation of treatment effects in clinical trials of antimanic agents.

Introduction

Recently, dimensional psychopathology has attracted increasing interest (Van Praag et al., 1990, Goldberg, 2000). This approach emphasizes the variety of clinical pictures in patients sharing the same categorical diagnosis, which is ascribed to the different weight in each patient of a small number of symptom clusters. While factor analysis has often been used to investigate the symptom structure of schizophrenia (Blanchard and Cohen, 2006, Peralta and Cuesta, 2001) and depressive disorders (Biondi et al., 2005), factor analytic studies of mania are relatively rare.

Several investigations were performed on heterogeneous samples including manic patients and patients with other severe mental disorders (Lindenmayer et al., 2004, Maziade et al., 1995, McIntosh et al., 2001, Peralta et al., 1997, Serretti et al., 2001, Serretti and Olgiati, 2004, Toomey et al., 1998, Ventura et al., 2000). However, they mainly aimed at identifying common factors shared by psychotic disorders, rather than elucidating the specific symptom structure of mania.

Few studies included only patients with bipolar disorder (Beigel and Murphy, 1971, Cassidy et al., 1998, Daneluzzo et al., 2002, Dilsaver et al., 1999, Double, 1990, Gonzalez-Pinto et al., 2003, Perugi et al., 2001, Rossi et al., 2001, Sato et al., 2002, Swann et al., 2001). While they contributed to the understanding of the psychopathology of mania, most of them have limitations such as small sample size (Beigel and Murphy, 1971, Double, 1990), inclusion of patients with mixed episode (Cassidy et al., 1998, Daneluzzo et al., 2002, Dilsaver et al., 1999, Gonzalez-Pinto et al., 2003, Sato et al., 2002), and use of assessment instruments specifically designed for mania (Beigel and Murphy, 1971, Cassidy et al., 1998, Double, 1990) or affective disorders (Gonzalez-Pinto et al., 2003, Rossi et al., 2001). Given that disorder-specific instruments are relatively narrow in scope and cannot cover the full spectrum of psychopathology, factorial solutions derived from such instruments may not depict the whole psychopathological picture.

This study was performed within the PROGRES-Acute project, a national survey of psychiatric inpatient care in Italy (de Girolamo et al., 2007, Gigantesco et al., 2007). The availability of psychometric data from a national sample of patients hospitalized for a manic episode provided an opportunity to further investigate the symptom structure of mania.

Section snippets

Sampling

All 21 Italian regions except Sicily participated in the study. Each region appointed a coordinator, who organized and supervised data collection. First, all inpatient facilities admitting acute patients with primary diagnosis of mental disorder were surveyed. Then, a 20% random sample of General Hospital Psychiatric Units (GHPUs), and all remaining public and private facilities were selected for further detailed study. However, in the Lazio region participation was on voluntary basis due to

Results

In the eigenvalue plot, we observed an inflection point after the first four factors, which clearly stood above the line traced across the subsequent minor factors. Hence, four factors were extracted, accounting for 51% of total variance. After rotation, a fairly simple structure emerged. Communality values were fairly high, indicating that most variables were well defined by this factor solution, except for some items assessing depressive symptoms which were uncommon in our sample.

The common

Discussion

This study suggested that four main factors underlie manic states. The first was clearly interpretable as ‘Mania’ as it was loaded by items covering core manic symptoms. A very similar factor emerged in the previous study of the BPRS-24 factor structure in patients with psychotic disorders, among whom some manic patients (Ventura et al., 2000). Studies on manic or mixed patients which used other instruments also found a similar factor, variously named as ‘grandiosity’, ‘euphoria’, ‘activation’,

Role of funding source

The PROGRES-Acute Project was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health. The Ministry of Health had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared.

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Paolo Pancheri, MD, Professor of Psychiatry at ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome, Italy, who introduced many of us to dimensional psychopathology and sadly passed away recently.

We are grateful to all the colleagues who took part in the study as national or regional coordinators, scientific consultants, or research assistants: F. Amaddeo, A. Barbato, G. Borsetti, R. Canosa, M. Casacchia, I. Casula, P. Ciliberti, A. Colotto, A. D'Aloise, G. Dell'Acqua, M.

References (32)

  • SerrettiA. et al.

    Dimensions of major psychoses: a confirmatory factor analysis of six competing models

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2004)
  • SwannA.C. et al.

    Structure of mania: depressive, irritable, and psychotic clusters with different retrospectively-assessed course patterns of illness in randomized clinical trial participants

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (2001)
  • VenturaJ. et al.

    Symptom dimensions in recent-onset schizophrenia and mania: a principal components analysis of the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2000)
  • BeigelA. et al.

    Assessing clinical characteristics of the manic state

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1971)
  • BernerP. et al.

    Psychopathological concepts of dysphoria

    Psychopathology

    (1987)
  • BlanchardJ.J. et al.

    The structure of negative symptoms within schizophrenia: implications for assessment

    Schizophr. Bull.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Psychopathology of Mixed States

      2020, Psychiatric Clinics of North America
    • Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers

      2017, Behaviour Research and Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Substantial skew has been found in economic and cost indicators (Barber & Thompson, 2000; Hlatky, Boothroyd, & Johnstone, 2002) and measures of quality of life (Arostegui, Nunez-Anton, & Quintana, 2007) and social functioning (Tyrer et al., 2005) in clinical trial data. Skew is the norm in measures of depression (Rutter & Miglioretti, 2003; Zimmerman, Chelminski, & Posternak, 2004), mania (Picardi et al., 2008) and suicidal ideation (Binks et al., 2006). Experimental psychopathology research typically measures clinical constructs in analogue populations, and these too often have heavily skewed distributions (Rutter & Miglioretti, 2003; Tyrer et al., 2005; Zimmerman et al., 2004).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text