Research reportWhat really matters to bipolar patients' caregivers: Sources of family burden
Introduction
Bipolar disorder is a chronic and recurrent illness that constitutes the sixth leading cause of disability amongst the physical and psychiatric disorders (López and Murray, 1998). Psychosocial and occupational difficulties (MacQueen et al., 2001, Goldberg and Harrow, 2004), financial problems (Kleinman et al., 2003), marital failure (Brodie and Leff, 1971, Kessler et al., 1998), substance abuse (Kessler et al., 1996, Levin and Hennessy, 2004), neuropsychological deficits (Martínez-Arán et al., 2004) and suicide (Hawton et al., 2005) are some of the possible consequences of the illness impairment. Even during remission, residual symptoms may still be present in a high proportion of patients (Fava, 1999, Judd et al., 2002, Judd et al., 2003) and, although syndromal recovery may be achieved soon after hospitalization, functional recovery seems to be more difficult to achieve (Tohen et al., 2000). The disease has a significant impact on the patient's perception of the quality of life both within and outside the family (Morselli et al., 2004). Every episode of the illness is a stressful life event for all the family members and, even when the illness is stabilized, the fear of new relapses is often present.
Since families became more actively involved in the care of the patient as a consequence of deinstitutionalization, the effects of the family's attitudes on the patient's illness course (Miklowitz et al., 1988, Priebe et al., 1989, Mino et al., 2001, Yan et al., 2004) have been complemented by research related to the impact of the illness on caregivers (Reinares and Vieta, 2004). The caregiving role is very demanding, frequently distressing, and harmful to health and quality of life (Struening et al., 2001). Family burden is commonly defined as the consequences that living with an ill relative has on caregivers. A high burden level on relatives of bipolar patients has been reported (Chakrabarti et al., 1992, Perlick et al., 1999, Dore and Romans, 2001) and recent studies have shown that caregiver's burden may influence the clinical outcome of bipolar disorder (Perlick et al., 2001, Perlick et al., 2004).
Identifying and modifying burdensome aspects might help to reduce the level of burden and their negative effects both on the caregivers and patient outcome. A prolonged illness and high levels of dysfunction among patients (Chakrabarti et al., 1992), caregiver illness beliefs (Perlick et al., 1999) and coping style (Chakrabarti and Gill, 2002) are some of the factors that have been reported in the literature as influencing the family burden perceived by relatives of bipolar patients. However, the predictors of burden have to be more deeply investigated. Another area of research is to analyse which were the most troublesome aspects of burden (Targum et al., 1981). Unfortunately, burden studies of bipolar patients and their families are scarce and most of the existing ones have mainly used small and/or heterogeneous patient samples. Data on caregivers' burden in samples of non-acutely ill patients are particularly scant. Judd et al., 2002, Judd et al., 2003 reported that patients spent more time in remission or subthreshold symptoms. As suggested by Ogilvie et al. (2005), there is a need to understand caregivers' views and perceptions of the stresses and demands arising from caring for someone with bipolar disorder in order to develop practical, appropriate, and acceptable interventions and to improve the training of professionals working with bipolar patients and their caregivers.
The aims of this study were to assess the level of subjective burden in a sample of euthymic bipolar patients' caregivers, to analyse what the most burdensome aspects for caregivers were and to study which variables (sociodemographic and related to the illness) may influence the subjective burden as experienced by caregivers.
Section snippets
Subjects
The sample was obtained from the Bipolar Disorders Program of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona. To be enrolled, patients were required to fulfill DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I or bipolar II disorder, being euthymic for at least 3 months (scoring lower than 9 on the HDRS and lower than 7 on the YMRS) and aged between 18 and 65 years. All the patients received standard pharmacological treatment following the treatment algorithms of the Barcelona Bipolar Disorders Program. Exclusion criteria were
Sample description and patients' flow
The first 100 consecutive patients and their caregivers fulfilling inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the study. Fourteen cases refused to join the study giving general reasons, mainly due to lack of available time. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the patient and caregiver sample.
Degree of subjective burden and most burdensome aspects
With respect to subjective burden, as a mean, the caregiver sample showed a moderate level of distress. The highest levels of distress were reported regarding the patient's behaviour, followed by
Discussion
The caregivers in this sample had a moderate level of subjective burden. The highest levels of distress were reported regarding the patient's behaviour, followed by the distress related to adverse effects on others and finally by the patient's role dysfunction. Although the literature is limited, other authors have also described high levels of burden related to bipolar disorder, but in contrast with our study, most of them included symptomatic patients (Fadden et al., 1987a, Chakrabarti et
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by grants from the Stanley Medical Research Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA) and FIS-PI051542.
References (52)
- et al.
Impact of cognitive–psychoeducational interventions in bipolar patients and their relatives
Eur. Psychiatr.
(2006) - et al.
A randomized clinical trial of inpatient family intervention: V. Results for affective disorders
J. Affect. Disord.
(1990) - et al.
Impact of bipolar affective disorder on family and partners
J. Affect. Disord.
(2001) - et al.
Consistency of remission and outcome in bipolar and unipolar mood disorders: a 10-year prospective follow-up
J. Affect. Disord.
(2004) - et al.
Bipolar disorder and substance abuse
Biol. Psyhiatry
(2004) - et al.
Expressed emotion of families and the course of mood disorders: a cohort study in Japan
J. Affect. Disord.
(2001) - et al.
Expressed emotion versus relationship quality variables in the prediction of recurrences in bipolar patients
J. Affect. Disord.
(2004) - et al.
Bipolar depression – a comparative study of patient characteristics
Am. J. Psychiatry
(1971) - et al.
Versión Española de una escala de evaluación de la manía: validez y fiabilidad de la escala de Young
Med. Clin. (Barn.)
(2002) - et al.
A randomized trial on the efficacy of group psychoeducation in the prophylaxis of recurrences in bipolar patients whose disease is in remission
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(2003)