Reviews and feature article
Update: Vaccines in primary immunodeficiency

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.980Get rights and content

Vaccines were originally developed to prevent or ameliorate infectious disease. As knowledge of immune function and appreciation of immunodeficiency has developed, researchers have used vaccine responses as a tool to characterize the phenotypes of patients exhibiting various syndromes. Thus it has become possible for a clinician to evaluate individual responses to vaccines to interrogate the immunocompetence of their patients. Although there have been many advances in these areas, we still have much to learn about the quantity and quality of humoral and cellular vaccine responses in healthy and immunodeficient subjects and how that knowledge can then be extrapolated to diagnostic purposes. Adverse effects of vaccines have been recognized for many years, especially the occurrence of infections caused by viable vaccine organisms in immunodeficient hosts. Nevertheless, vaccines are essential for disease prevention in immunodeficient patients, just as they are for healthy subjects. Clinicians must understand the appropriate and safe use of vaccines in patients with immunodeficiency. This review highlights some recent advances and ongoing challenges in application of vaccines for the diagnosis and treatment of immunodeficiencies.

Section snippets

Diagnostic use of vaccines for PIDs

Vaccine efficacy is established through reduction of the incidence of infection in vaccine recipients. The predominant surrogate marker for vaccine efficacy is production of specific IgG. This is appropriate in most cases because neutralizing or opsonizing antibody represents a principal protective mechanism induced by natural infection. This is also convenient because measurement of blood antibody levels is technically (relatively) simple and inexpensive.

The predictive value of diminished

Human papillomavirus vaccine

A variety of innate and adaptive cellular immunodeficiencies are associated with increased susceptibility to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.39 These include severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID); Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome; ataxia-telangiectasia; nuclear factor κB essential modulator deficiency; leukocyte adhesion deficiency (CD18 mutation); X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome; disseminated warts, immunodeficiency, lymphedema, anogenital dysplasia (WILD) syndrome; epidermodysplasia verruciformis

BCG

In patients with PIDs, most attention related to adverse events related to immunization involve administration of viable vaccines (Table I). This is borne out in one retrospective study of all vaccine-related adverse events in a fairly large cohort of 379 patients at a single center.54 In this report 15 definite or probable vaccine adverse events were recorded. Nine (60%) of these involved live agent vaccines. Among these, 7 involved BCG.

The attenuated tuberculosis vaccine BCG (Mycobacterium

Conclusion

Educated and judicious vaccine use for immunoprophylaxis and in some cases for disease treatment are as critical for health maintenance in patients with PIDs as for all persons. Systematic study of normal vaccine responses will help refine their diagnostic use for PIDs. This is especially so for polysaccharide antigen responses, which remain challenging to characterize clinically, even in healthy subjects. It might be necessary to modify existing assays or develop new ones to realize this goal.

References (85)

  • X. Bossuyt et al.

    Age- and serotype-dependent antibody response to pneumococcal polysaccharides

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2011)
  • V. Moschese et al.

    Decreased IgM, IgA, and IgG response to pneumococcal vaccine in children with transient hypogammaglobulinemia of infancy

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2016)
  • S. Sanchez-Ramon et al.

    Multicenter study for the evaluation of the antibody response against Salmonella typhi Vi vaccination (EMPATHY) for the diagnosis of anti-polysaccharide antibody production deficiency in patients with primary immunodeficiency

    Clin Immunol

    (2016)
  • S. Ladhani et al.

    Immunoglobulin deficiency in children with Hib vaccine failure

    Vaccine

    (2011)
  • H. Ingels et al.

    Impact of pneumococcal vaccination in Denmark during the first 3 years after PCV introduction in the childhood immunization programme

    Vaccine

    (2012)
  • H.C. Slotved et al.

    The effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease caused by ten non-vaccine serotypes in Denmark

    Vaccine

    (2016)
  • M.G. Seidel et al.

    Vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis virus tests specific IgG production ability in patients under immunoglobulin substitution therapy

    Vaccine

    (2010)
  • J.W. Leiding et al.

    Warts and all: human papillomavirus in primary immunodeficiencies

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2012)
  • J.M. Dorn et al.

    WILD syndrome is GATA2 deficiency: a novel deletion in the GATA2 gene

    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract

    (2017)
  • C.R. MacIntyre et al.

    Immunogenicity and persistence of immunity of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in immunocompromised children

    Vaccine

    (2016)
  • A.K. Junker et al.

    How to flee the flu

    Clin Immunol

    (2004)
  • S. van Assen et al.

    Patients with humoral primary immunodeficiency do not develop protective anti-influenza antibody titers after vaccination with trivalent subunit influenza vaccine

    Clin Immunol

    (2010)
  • S. van Assen et al.

    Cell-mediated immune responses to inactivated trivalent influenza-vaccination are decreased in patients with common variable immunodeficiency

    Clin Immunol

    (2011)
  • S. Goldacker et al.

    Active vaccination in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID)

    Clin Immunol

    (2007)
  • J.D. Sarmiento et al.

    Adverse events following immunization in patients with primary immunodeficiencies

    Vaccine

    (2016)
  • B.E. Marciano et al.

    BCG vaccination in patients with severe combined immunodeficiency: complications, risks, and vaccination policies

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2014)
  • A. Santos et al.

    Severe axillary lymphadenitis after BCG vaccination: alert for primary immunodeficiencies

    J Microbiol Immunol Infect

    (2010)
  • N. Al-Sukaiti et al.

    Safety and efficacy of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine in patients with DiGeorge syndrome

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2010)
  • C. Azzari et al.

    Safety and immunogenicity of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine in children with congenital immunodeficiency (DiGeorge syndrome)

    Vaccine

    (2005)
  • M. Valenzise et al.

    Post vaccine acute disseminated encephalomyelitis as the first manifestation of chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in a 15-month old baby: a case report

    Vaccine

    (2014)
  • C. Bodemer et al.

    Live rubella virus vaccine long-term persistence as an antigenic trigger of cutaneous granulomas in patients with primary immunodeficiency

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2014)
  • M.M. Alleman et al.

    Estimating the burden of rubella virus infection and congenital rubella syndrome through a rubella immunity assessment among pregnant women in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: potential impact on vaccination policy

    Vaccine

    (2016)
  • J. Guo et al.

    Immunodeficiency-related vaccine-derived poliovirus (iVDPV) cases: a systematic review and implications for polio eradication

    Vaccine

    (2015)
  • N. Bakare et al.

    Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and rotavirus vaccination: reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)

    Vaccine

    (2010)
  • J.C. Bester

    Measles and measles vaccination: a review

    JAMA Pediatr

    (2016)
  • W.T. Shearer et al.

    Recommendations for live viral and bacterial vaccines in immunodeficient patients and their close contacts

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2014)
  • F.A. Bonilla et al.

    Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2015)
  • L. Moens et al.

    Different immunological pathways underlie the immune response to pneumococcal polysaccharides

    J Clin Immunol

    (2017)
  • R.R. Patel et al.

    Travel advice for the immunocompromised traveler: prophylaxis, vaccination, and other preventive measures

    Ther Clin Risk Manag

    (2015)
  • P.D.E. Miller et al.

    Routine vaccination practice after adult and paediatric allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant: a survey of UK NHS programmes

    Bone Marrow Transplant

    (2017)
  • R.U. Sorensen et al.

    Measurement of pneumococcal polysaccharide antibodies

    J Clin Immunol

    (2014)
  • W.J. Janssen et al.

    Measurement of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine responses for immunodeficiency diagnostics: combined IgG responses compared to serotype specific IgG responses

    J Clin Immunol

    (2014)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Cellular assays to evaluate B-cell function

      2023, Journal of Immunological Methods
    • Development and validation of a microfluidic multiplex immunoassay for the determination of levels and avidity of serum antibodies to tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis antigens

      2022, Journal of Immunological Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the laboratory-based tools to evaluate suspected humoral immunodeficiencies is the assessment of antigen-specific immune responses towards both protein and polysaccharide vaccine antigens (Orange et al., 2012; Marsh and Orange, 2019). Antibody responses towards tetanus or diphtheria toxoids are often used to determine a patient's ability to mount an immune response towards protein antigens, because they are potent immunogens with high seroconversion rates (Chouksey and Berger, 2008; Bonilla, 2018). This evaluation can be supplemented with other vaccine antigens such as pertussis, since the conclusions about the patient's ability to respond will be more valid when more different antigens are evaluated (Chouksey and Berger, 2008).

    • Pneumococcal serotype-specific cut-offs based on antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination in healthy adults

      2021, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data on pneumococcal antibody responses from different laboratories show considerable variability in interpretation of data [29,30]. A prospective study would be required to ascertain whether the proposed serotype threshold provides greater sensitivity in identifying patients with defects in antibody response to pneumococcal polysaccharides, either due to a global humoral defect, or specific antibody deficiency [2-4,6]. Most of the pneumococcal vaccines available and in development are conjugate vaccines, which instigate a T-dependent antibody response, as opposed to the polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax®), which promotes a T-independent type 2 antibody response.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: F. A. Bonilla has a board membership with the Louis August Jonas Foundation; has consultant arrangements with Grand Rounds Health, the Immune Deficiency Foundation, Charles River Associates International, Green Cross, Parexel, Sarepta Inc, Cowen Group, Gerson-Lehrman Group, Grifols, and Huron Consulting Group; has received a grant from Shire, Inc; has received payment for lectures from Albany Medical College and Drexel University; and has received royalties from UpToDate.

    View full text