New research
Preschool Psychopathology Reported by Parents in 23 Societies: Testing the Seven-Syndrome Model of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.019Get rights and content

Objective

To test the fit of a seven-syndrome model to ratings of preschoolers' problems by parents in very diverse societies.

Method

Parents of 19,106 children 18 to 71 months of age from 23 societies in Asia, Australasia, Europe, the Middle East, and South America completed the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5 (CBCL/1.5–5). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the seven-syndrome model separately for each society.

Results

The primary model fit index, the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), indicated acceptable to good fit for each society. Although a six-syndrome model combining the Emotionally Reactive and Anxious/Depressed syndromes also fit the data for nine societies, it fit less well than the seven-syndrome model for seven of the nine societies. Other fit indices yielded less consistent results than the RMSEA.

Conclusions

The seven-syndrome model provides one way to capture patterns of children's problems that are manifested in ratings by parents from many societies. Clinicians working with preschoolers from these societies can thus assess and describe parents' ratings of behavioral, emotional, and social problems in terms of the seven syndromes. The results illustrate possibilities for culture–general taxonomic constructs of preschool psychopathology. Problems not captured by the CBCL/1.5–5 may form additional syndromes, and other syndrome models may also fit the data.

Section snippets

Previous EFA and CFA Studies of the Preschool CBCL

Konold et al.6 tested the CBCL/1.5–5 syndrome model using CBCL data obtained in the National Institute of Child Health and Development Study of Early Child Care (NICHD SECC). Mothers of 1,097 children completed an early version of the CBCL/1.5–5, namely the CBCL for Ages 2–37, when the children were 24 months old. The study tested whether the CBCL/1.5–5 syndrome model was invariant across gender, ethnic groups (African American vs. white), and socioeconomic status (SES; low vs. high). First,

Study Purpose

The purpose of this study was to test the configural invariance of the correlated seven-syndrome model of the CBCL/1.5–54 in 23 societies. We believe this study to be the first multicultural test of taxonomic constructs of preschool psychopathology. It differs from other studies of preschool psychopathology by using uniform CFA procedures to test the same syndrome model in 23 societies. If a syndrome model is supported in many societies, it can provide a taxonomy for assessing psychopathology

Samples

We analyzed data for 19,106 children 1.5 to 5 years old from the 23 epidemiological samples listed in Table 1. We included children who were referred for mental health services. The English language CBCL/1.5–5 was translated for use in all societies except in Australia. Independent back-translations established that translations captured the original meanings. Consent requirements for each investigator's institution were fulfilled. All samples were approximately 50% male. In a companion paper

Results

The model converged for all samples. As presented in Table 1, RMSEAs ranged from 0.036 to 0.059, indicating acceptable to good fit for all societies (25th percentile = 0.043, 50th = 0.045, and 75th = 0.048). CFIs ranged from 0.789 to 0.952, indicating acceptable to good fit for all societies except Iran and Italy (25th percentile = 0.847, 50th = 0.878, and 75th = 0.904). TLIs ranged from 0.824 to 0.972 (25th percentile = 0.901, 50th = 0.920, and 75th = 0.933), indicating acceptable to good fit

Discussion

We found that the seven-syndrome model fit the data for all 23 societies. Our primary fit index, the RMSEA, indicated acceptable to good fit in all societies, although the CFI and TLI were more variable. Of the 5,267 estimated parameters, the two (0.04%) that were outside the allowable parameter space possibly reflected sampling error, according to Van Driel.21 Across societies, the median loading of items on their respective factors was high (0.61).

The findings supported the configural

References (32)

  • H.L. Egger

    Psychiatric assessment in young children

    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am

    (2009)
  • H.L. Egger et al.

    Common emotional and behavioral disorders in preschool children: Presentation, nosology, and epidemiology

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • C. Postert et al.

    Five systems of psychiatric classification for preschool children: Do differences in validity, usefulness, and reliability make for competitive or complimentary constellations?

    Child Psychiatry Hum Dev

    (2009)
  • T.M. Achenbach et al.

    Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles

    (2000)
  • R.J. Vandenberg et al.

    A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research

    Organ Res Methods

    (2000)
  • T.R. Konold et al.

    Measuring problem behaviors in young children

    Behav Disord

    (2003)
  • T.M. Achenbach

    Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3 and 1992 Profile

    (1992)
  • T.X. Tan et al.

    Factor structure and clinical implications of Child Behavior Checklist/1.5–5 ratings in a sample of girls adopted from China

    J Pediatr Psychol

    (2007)
  • H.M. Koot et al.

    Behavioral and emotional problems in young preschoolers: Cross-cultural testing of the validity of the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3

    J Abnorm Child Psychol

    (1997)
  • J. Graham

    Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world

    Annu Rev Psychol

    (2009)
  • Stata Statistical Software: Release 10

    (2007)
  • T.E. Raghunathan et al.

    Multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models

    Surv Methodol

    (2001)
  • S. Van Buuren et al.

    Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation

    J Stat Comput Simulation

    (2006)
  • L.K. Muthén et al.

    Mplus User's guide

    (2007)
  • C.Y. Yu et al.

    Evaluation of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Categorical and Continuous Outcomes (Technical Report)

    (2002)
  • M.W. Browne et al.

    Alternative ways of assessing model fit

  • Cited by (220)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article is discussed in an editorial by Dr. Alice Carter on page 1181.

    Disclosure: Dr. Ivanova receives research and salary support from the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, which publishes the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Dr. Achenbach is President of the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, and receives remuneration. Dr. Rescorla receives remuneration from the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families. Dr. Harder previously held a University of Vermont Postdoctoral Fellowship funding by the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families. Drs. Bjarnadottir, Gudmundsson, Leung, Verhulst, and Mr. Gudmundsson, receive research support from the sale of the CBCL. Dr. Bilenberg has received honoraria from Eli Lilly and Co., Novartis, Neuroscience, and Janseen Cilag. He has received research support from the Danish Research Foundation, the Lundbeck Foundation, Hermansens Mindelegat, and Mads Clausen Fond. Dr. Eapen has received research support from the Sheikh Hamdan Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Award for Medical Sciences. Dr. Jusiene has received research support from the Lithuanian Science and Studies Foundation. Drs. Ang, Capron, Dias, Dobrean, Doepfner, Duyme, Erol, Esmaeili, Ezpeleta, Frigerio, Gonçalves, Jeng, Kim, Liu, Oh, Plueck, Pomalima, Shahini, Silva, Simsek, Sourander, Valverde, Van Leeuwen, and Zubrick, Ms. De Pauw, Ms. Kristensen, Mr. Lecannelier, Ms. Montirosso, Ms. Jetishi, Ms. Woo, and Ms. Wu report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

    View full text