Asking good clinical research questions and choosing the right study design
Introduction
“Judge of a man by his questions rather than by his answers”
(Voltaire, French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist; 1694–1778).4
Users of medical research, especially clinical practitioners, focus primarily on accessing results of clinical studies to answer clinical questions, most frequently “Does this intervention work?” Comparatively little attention is paid to the questions themselves. Yet failure to think carefully about the meaning, structure and intention of research questions can have adverse effects on every subsequent step of the research process, potentially compromising the answers. The fundamental purpose of asking good questions is to match these to an appropriate and feasible study design.
This paper outlines principles and strategies for asking good clinical research questions and identifying appropriate research paradigms and designs.
Section snippets
Sources and examples of questions
Clinicians and researchers encounter a range of external and self-generated questions on a daily basis. As outlined in Table 1, the focus and nature of these questions varies according to the perspective of the stakeholder. Patients focus on issues of most relevance to their specific situation, such as relief of symptoms; the clinician or researcher considers broader issues, for example choosing from a range of intervention options; colleagues and funders seek justification of interventions and
What is the question about?
The development of an answerable clinical research question using the ‘PICO’ principles facilitates the important process of categorising the question according to its central clinical issue,6 as illustrated in Table 3. This table shows that therapeutic interventions are only one of a number of clinical issues that can be addressed by clinical research questions. There are many other categories in addition to those identified in Table 3, including aetiology, prevention and differential
Conclusion
This paper has examined the issue of question development by considering two key principles: asking good questions and choosing the right study design. Identification and consideration of these principles is a critical first step in the research process. Giving careful thought to these issues can substantially focus emerging questions and aid in the determination of how they may be best addressed in research terms.
However, the nature of human enquiry, combined with the complexity of medicine,
Disclosure statement
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this paper.
References (8)
- Coleman K, Grimmer-Somers K, Hillier S, et al. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grade for recommendations for...
- et al.
Users’ guides to the medical literature. XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
JAMA
(2000) Asking answerable questions
Evidence-Based Nursing
(1998)- QuotationsPage.com. Voltaire Quote; 2007. Available at http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/28697.html [Accessed...
Cited by (26)
Protecting and Promoting Client Rights
2020, Protecting and Promoting Client RightsResearch without good questions is a waste
2019, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyHow often is adjacent segment disease reported? A systematic review of prospective studies comparing total disc arthoplasty versus ACDF
2013, Seminars in Spine SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Studies that published papers reporting results from the same clinical trial were excluded, and only the article reporting the longest follow-up of the study was included. The evidence-based method PICO6 (P: population of interest, I: intervention, C: comparison intervention, and O: outcome of interest) was used to create the following search in PubMed: {[(“Cervical Vertebrae”(Mesh) AND “Radiculopathy”(Mesh)) OR “Spinal Cord Diseases”(Mesh)] AND [“Arthrodesis”(Mesh) OR “Arthroplasty, Replacement”(Mesh)]}. This search produced 1889 results.
Mobile phone text messaging for improving secondary prevention in cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review
2018, Heart and LungCitation Excerpt :The purpose of research question is to guide the systematic review, hence, it must be well-defined, answerable and searchable.18 PICO format which is the significant components to facilitate the construction of answerable clinical questions.19,20 It includes following variables: population of interest (P), intervention (I), comparison (C) and the outcomes of interest (O).