Nurses’ decision-making process in cases of physical restraint in acute elderly care: A qualitative study
Introduction
The ethical dimension of care is an essential part of good nursing practice, and ethical reflection is necessary for nurses to come to thoughtful and balanced decisions (Bishop and Scudder, 1990). The review of Goethals et al. (2010) shows that nurses’ ethical practice is a complex process of reasoning and decision making that involves observing, analyzing, and judging patient-related issues. This decision making is influenced by nurses’ personal qualities. Limited staff and time are context-related elements that impede and complicate nurses’ ethical practice. As a result, more and more nurses prioritize medical technical care and experience the realization of the ethical dimension as a difficult and subordinated task (Milisen et al., 2006a).
Particularly in acute elderly care, where most of the patients have impaired physical and mental abilities and limited capacities to express their personal needs and wishes, the vulnerability of the patients increases. To deal appropriately with this vulnerability, nurses need to be able to critically observe and interpret patients’ signals in order to provide ethical care (Kihlgren and Thorsen, 1996, Randers and Matttiasson, 2000). Critical reflection on what constitutes good care is required in everyday care, but even more so in ethically charged situations such as those requiring physical restraint (Gastmans and Milisen, 2006). Physical restraint is defined as “any device, material, or equipment attached to or near a person's body that cannot be controlled or easily removed by the person and which deliberately prevents or is deliberately intended to prevent a person's free body movement to a position of choice and/or a person's normal access to their body” (Retsas, 1998).
During the last 20 years, awareness has increased about the frequent and unlimited use of restraint in the US, Australia, the UK, and other European countries (Hughes, 2010, Köpke et al., 2010). Based on research and motivated by a philosophy of individualized care, many measures are taken to change this standard of practice (Hughes, 2010). The use of physical restraints, however, is still a common practice (with a prevalence of 33–68%) in acute care settings (Hamers and Huizing, 2005) and remains an international topic of discussion. This discussion relates to several dimensions, including the violation of human rights (Hughes, 2010); the balance of clinical and ethical issues (Gastmans and Milisen, 2006, Gastmans, 2010); and to the question of whether physical restraint can ever be avoided (Flaherty, 2004).
Nurses’ key role in making decisions about the use of physical restraint must be understood in terms of their initiation of restraint use and/or by their intimate involvement in the care of restrained patients (Hamers and Huizing, 2005). A synthesis of qualitative evidence regarding nurses’ decision making in cases of physical restraint characterizes decision making as a complex trajectory that focuses on safety and is guided by ethical principles (Goethals et al., 2012). The different phases—e.g. before, during, and after restraint use—describe the trajectory character of the decision making (Kontio et al., 2010). The “complexity” of this trajectory is attributed to and depends on patient characteristics, such as degree of disruptive behavior (Janelli et al., 1995, Janelli and Kanski, 1996, Chien, 1999, Lee et al., 1999, Hantikainen, 2001, Ludwick et al., 2008); nurse-related factors, such as nurses’ willingness to take risks (Karlsson et al., 2000) and context-related factors, such as the family's viewpoint (Hantikainen and Käppeli, 2000).
While most of the included studies focused on one or more substantive elements of this complexity, only two studies described decision making as a “trajectory” (Ludwick et al., 2008, Kontio et al., 2010). A refined understanding of this trajectory would be helpful in understanding the complexity of nurses’ reasoning process in ethically laden situations. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore nurses’ decision making process in cases of physical restraint in acute elderly care.
Section snippets
Design
We used a qualitative interview design inspired by the Grounded Theory approach (Corbin and Strauss, 2008). The Grounded Theory approach is well suited for discovering complex phenomena such as understanding the underlying social processes of decision-making.
Procedure and sampling
All hospitals in Flanders, Belgium with an acute geriatric ward (n = 63) were contacted by email. Thirty-four hospitals participated in our study. The hospitals completed a questionnaire on hospital characteristics and selected a contact
Discussion of the methods
As far as we know, this is the first qualitative study to examine nurses’ decision-making process during cases of physical restraint in acute elderly care in Flanders, Belgium. This qualitative study provided rich and in-depth insight into nurses’ reasoning and decision making during situations of physical restraint. The strengths of this study are (1) the systematic and cyclic process of data collection and analysis, (2) the heterogeneity of the sample regarding both hospital and nurses
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the participants for their contribution to this study. We are also thankful to Els Bryon, Yvonne Denier, Corine Tiedtke, and Luc Van Gorp for their participation in the peer-review process.
Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.
Funding: This study is funded by the Flemish Community, Department of Education and the Catholic University College Ghent, Belgium.
Ethical approval: Catholic University of Leuven, Faculty of
References (44)
- et al.
Involvement of hospital nurses in care decisions related to administration of artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with dementia: a qualitative study
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2010) - et al.
QUAGOL: a guide for data analysis within the grounded theory approach
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2012) - et al.
The use of physical restraints as a safety measure in the care of older people in four rehabilitation wards: findings from an exploratory study
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2002) - et al.
Nurses’ ethical reasoning and behavior: a literature review
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2010) - et al.
Work environment and workforce problems: across-sectional questionnaire survey of hospital nurses in Belgium
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2006) - Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 1997. National Guideline Clearinghouse. Practice guideline for the...
- et al.
The practical, Moral and Personal Sense of Nursing. A Phenomenological Philosophy of Practice
(1990) - et al.
Characteristics of nursing homes that are restraint free
Gerontologist
(1998) The use of physical restraints to psychogeriatric patients in Hong Kong
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
(1999)Health and safety perspectives
Basics of Qualitative Research—Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
On behalf of the participants of the European Academy of Medicine of Ageing-Course III. Differences in period prevalence of the use of physical restraints in elderly inpatients of European hospitals and nursing homes. 2004
Journal of Gerontological Medical Sciences
Restraint in care: a multidisciplinary responsibility
Tijdschrift voor Verpleegkundigen
Nursing care for patients requesting euthanasia in general hospitals in Flanders, Belgium
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Physical restraint and medical interventions
Zero tolerance for physical restraints: difficult but not impossible
Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences
Perceptions of older people who have experienced physical restraint
British Journal of Nursing
Use of physical restraint in nursing homes: clinical–ethical considerations
Journal of Medical Ethics
Clinical–ethical considerations on the use of physical restraint
Nurses’ decision making in cases of physical restraint: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Restraint in care: a nurses’ decision
Tijdschrift voor Verpleegkundigen
Why do we use physical restraints in the elderly?
Zeitungfür Geronotologie und Geriatrie
Cited by (39)
Restraint use in the acute-care hospital setting: A cross-sectional multi-centre study
2021, International Journal of Nursing StudiesCitation Excerpt :Previous studies on the prevalence of restraint use in hospitals showed that rates range between 0% and 100% (Benbenbishty et al., 2010; Krüger et al., 2013). These large differences in the prevalence rates may be influenced by varying conditions, such as the restraint definition used, the legal situation in the country of origin or the availability of equipment (for example, for body fixation) (De Bellis et al., 2013; Goethals et al., 2013; Hignett et al., 2013; Lach et al., 2016). In general, the few published studies in the hospital setting have mainly focused on physical/mechanical restraints in specific subpopulations and/or in intensive care units (ICUs).
Beyond restraint: Raising awareness of restrictive practices in acute care settings
2018, International Journal of Nursing StudiesThe perceptions of patient safety culture: A difference between physicians and nurses in Taiwan
2018, Applied Nursing ResearchCitation Excerpt :For example, Lee, Huang, Huang, and Wu (2016) have suggested that hospital staffs with positive patient safety can help healthcare organizations to reduce medical adverse events, such as patient fall, medical errors, and work absence. Normally, Physicians and nurses under pressures and challenges in the working environments (Göethals et al., 2013). Chen et al. (2013) report that lots of physicians are under high pressure which result from mental depression, hospital culture, and long working hours.
Freedom and constraint of the ambulatory patient
2021, Soins Gerontologie