Elsevier

Fertility and Sterility

Volume 84, Issue 5, November 2005, Pages 1375-1387
Fertility and Sterility

Endometriosis
Treatment of symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis with an estrogen–progestogen combination versus low-dose norethindrone acetate

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.083Get rights and content

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of an estrogen–progestogen combination versus low-dose norethindrone acetate in the treatment of persistent pain after surgery for symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis.

Setting

Academic center.

Patient(s)

Ninety women with recurrent moderate or severe pelvic pain after unsuccessful conservative surgery for symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis.

Intervention(s)

Twelve-month, continuous treatment with oral ethinyl E2, 0.01 mg, plus cyproterone acetate, 3 mg/day, or norethindrone acetate, 2.5 mg/day.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Degree of satisfaction with therapy.

Result(s)

Seven women in the ethinyl E2 plus cyproterone acetate arm and five in the norethindrone acetate arm withdrew because of side effects (n=5), treatment inefficacy (n=6), or loss to follow-up (n=1). At 12 months, dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and dyschezia scores were substantially reduced without major between-group differences. Both regimens induced minor unfavorable variations in the serum lipid profile. According to an intention-to-treat analysis, 28 (62%) out of 45 patients in the ethinyl E2 plus cyproterone acetate group and 33 (73%) out of 45 in the norethindrone acetate group were satisfied with the treatment received.

Conclusion(s)

Low-dose norethindrone acetate could be considered an effective, tolerable, and inexpensive first-choice medical alternative to repeat surgery for treating symptomatic rectovaginal endometriotic lesions in patients who do not seek conception.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial compared a monophasic estrogen–progestogen combination containing cyproterone acetate with low-dose norethindrone acetate for the treatment of pelvic pain in women with persistent infiltrating rectovaginal endometriotic plaques after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis. We studied 18-year to 35-year-old regularly menstruating women not wanting pregnancy, who had undergone laparoscopy or laparotomy for stage I to IV (18

Results

One hundred and thirteen women evaluated at our endometriosis outpatient clinic were eligible for the study, but 15 declined randomization and requested other treatment methods, and eight were lost to further contact. Forty-five of the remaining patients were allocated to the continuous ethinyl E2 plus cyproterone acetate combination arm and 45 to the norethindrone acetate arm.

The baseline clinical characteristics of the women enrolled in the study are shown in Table 2. The distribution of the

Discussion

Rectovaginal endometriosis has been treated successfully with vaginal danazol (6), intramuscular depot GnRH analogues (7), and intrauterine progestins (10), but we are not aware of published reports on the use of oral progestogens or estrogen–progestogen combinations. Admittedly, progestogen treatments are symptomatic and do not cure deep-infiltrating disease (4). However, conservative surgery does not seem to be an optimal remedy for this condition as medium-term cumulative severe pain

References (25)

  • J. Ford et al.

    Pain, quality of life and complications following the radical resection of rectovaginal endometriosis

    BJOG

    (2004)
  • P. Vercellini et al.

    Deep endometriosisdefinition, pathogenesis, and clinical management

    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc

    (2004)
  • Cited by (173)

    • Pharmacology of Endometriosis

      2022, Comprehensive Pharmacology
    • Advances in the medical management of bowel endometriosis

      2021, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    • Dienogest or Norethindrone acetate for the treatment of ovarian endometriomas: Can we avoid surgery?

      2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text