Patterns of axillary staging and management in clinically node positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: Results of a survey amongst breast cancer specialists

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.08.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Various options for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are available for breast cancer patients with a clinically positive axillary node (cN+). This survey assessed current practices amongst breast cancer specialists.

Materials and methods

A survey was performed amongst members of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and two UK-based Associations: the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. The survey included 3 parts: 1. general information, 2. diagnostic work-up and 3. axillary staging after NST.

Results

A total of 310 responses were collected: parts 1, 2 and 3 were fully completed by 282 (91%), 270 (87.1%) and 225 (72.6%) respondents respectively. After NST, 153/267 (57.3%) respondents currently perform ALND routinely and 114 (42.7%) respondents perform less invasive restaging of the axilla with possible omission of ALND. In the latter group, 85% does and 15% does not use nodal response seen on imaging to guide the axillary restaging procedure. Regarding respondents that do use imaging: 95% would perform a less invasive staging procedure in case of complete nodal response on imaging (63% sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), excision of a previously marked positive node with SLNB (21%) and without SLNB (11%)). In case of no nodal response on imaging 77% would perform ALND.

Conclusion

Current axillary staging and management practices in cN + patients after NST vary widely. To determine optimal axillary staging and management in terms of quality of life and oncologic safety, breast specialists are encouraged to include patients in clinical trials/prospective registries.

Introduction

The management of the axilla in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients has evolved towards a less or even non-invasive approach. For clinically node-positive breast cancer patients (cN+) however, the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been the standard of care until recently. cN + patients are increasingly receiving systemic therapy before surgery (i.e. neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST)). As a result of NST, in at least 1/3 of pre-treatment cN + patients the axilla converts to node-negative [1]. In case of a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the axilla, ALND may be unnecessary and its purpose is therefore being questioned [2,3].

In order to identify cN + ypN0 patients, several less invasive procedures have been proposed. These procedures can be largely divided into 3 groups: sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), excision of a pre-treatment marked positive lymph node (e.g. MARI: Marking Axillary lymph node with Radioactive Iodine seed) [4] or procedures involving the combination of both (e.g. TAD: Targeted Axillary Dissection [5], RISAS: Radioactive Iodine Seed localization in the Axilla combined with a SLNB; the iodine seed is placed in the positive axillary lymph node prior to start of NST [6]). Currently, no consensus exists on which procedure is most accurate for axillary staging after NST. Moreover, long-term data on whether these less invasive procedures can safely replace ALND, even in case of axillary pCR, are lacking.

The lack of evidence based consensus guidelines for cN + patients treated with NST results into broadly differing patterns of care in the management of the axilla. The present survey focused on breast cancer specialists (mainly European) to assess current practices regarding diagnostic work up and axillary staging in cN + patients treated with NST.

Section snippets

Participants and survey

An anonymous survey was made accessible to members of the European Society of Surgical Oncology, the Association of Breast Surgery (ABS) and the British Association of Surgical Oncology (BASO). A link to the survey was uploaded on the websites of these 3 Associations and included in several newsletters. The survey was developed using SurveyMonkey Inc. and consisted of 3 parts: 1. general information, 2. diagnostic work-up/indications for NST and 3. axillary staging after NST. The expected time

General information

Characteristics regarding general information of the respondents are summarized in Table 1. A total of 310 respondents submitted the survey, of whom 282 (91%) fully completed the first section on general information. All 310 respondents felt this topic to be clinically relevant. Institutional lack of consensus was reported by 113/310 (36.5%) respondents. Dissatisfaction with local protocols for axillary staging and management was reported by 94/310 (30.3%) respondents as a consequence of the

Discussion

Patients with cN + breast cancer treated with NST achieve an axillary pCR in up to 74%, depending on tumour characteristics [1,6,7]. In pursue of omitting ALND in these patients, several less invasive staging procedures have been proposed to identify axillary pCR. This survey displays the great variety of axillary staging procedures and treatment protocols, thereby indicating a worldwide need for consensus regarding the optimal method for axillary staging after NST in cN + patients.

Our survey

Conclusion

In conclusion, axillary staging and management practices for cN + patients treated with NST appear to vary widely. This indicates the need for a consensus. Breast cancer specialists should continue to join efforts to encourage cN + patients to participate in clinical trials or registries regarding axillary staging and management after NST. Consequently, we can gather evidence and crystallize accurate and safe axillary staging and management of cN + patients treated with NST.

Declarations of interest

None.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants for contributing to this study. We thank the following Associations for assistance with circulating the survey: Association of Breast Surgery, British Association of Surgical Oncology and European Society of Surgical Oncology.

JM Simons received salary from the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding).

References (24)

  • L.S. Dominici

    Cytologically proven axillary lymph node metastases are eradicated in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer

    Cancer

    (2010)
  • R.F. van la Parra et al.

    Selective elimination of breast cancer surgery in exceptional responders: historical perspective and current trials

    Breast Cancer Res

    (2016)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Factors predicting one or two sentinel lymph nodes to be accepted for sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant therapy in initially node-positive breast cancer patients

      2021, Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, marking the positive node at initial biopsy and ensuring removal of the marked node at the time of surgery has shown a very low FNR (2.4% by targeted axillary dissection [9] and 7% by marking the axillary lymph node with radioactive iodine seeds [10]). However, according to recent publications, some surgeons still use alternative procedures other than marked node removal, such as an optimized SLNB procedure [4,11]. On the other hand, several prospective studies have demonstrated that SLNB provides FNRs of <10% when ≥3 SLNs [12,13] are harvested.

    • First Surgical National Consensus Conference of the Italian Breast Surgeons association (ANISC) on breast cancer management in neoadjuvant setting: Results and summary

      2021, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, a recent survey on axillary staging and management in clinically positive BC patients treated with NACT among members of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and two UK-based associations documented that more the 57% of respondents routinely perform ALND and 43% respondents perform a less invasive restaging of the axilla with possible omission of ALND. Most surgeons (85%) reported to use the nodal response seen on imaging to guide the axillary restaging procedure [36]. The Results showed that axillary staging and management for cN + patients treated with NACT appear to vary widely [40].

    • The applicability of Magseed® for targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

      2021, Breast
      Citation Excerpt :

      TLN negative patients after NAC can be spared ALND, as is already standard of care in some breast centers, TLN positive patients also could be spared ALND, in analogy to ACOSOG Z 0011, to give radiotherapy to the breast and the axilla and the regional lymph nodes plus additional systemic treatment according to tumor biology. Simons et al. [20] recently published a survey on management practices in node positive patients after NAC with a wide variety in management practices. Further clinical trials are under investigation to determine the optimal surgical approach for patients with positive lymph nodes and NAC, with the goal to replace SLNB by TLNB and to omit ALND for patients who may not benefit from axillary clearance.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text