Elsevier

Early Human Development

Volume 86, Issue 12, December 2010, Pages 765-772
Early Human Development

Does preterm birth increase a child's risk for language impairment?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.08.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Although premature birth is associated with lags in language acquisition, it is unclear whether preterms exhibit an elevated risk for language impairment (LI). This study determined whether preterms, without frank cerebral damage, at 2;6 and 3;6 exhibited a higher rate of risk for LI as compared to full-terms, and also sought to identify predictors of risk.

Method

Sixty-four Italian very immature preterms were assessed longitudinally at 2;6 and 3;6; age-matched full-terms served as controls at 2;6 (n = 22) and 3;6 (n = 40). Each completed individualized assessments of cognition and language ability. At each time point, using cut-offs specific to each of the language measures, children were differentiated into two groups (at risk for LI, not at risk).

Results

The percentage of full-terms at risk for LI at 2;6 (9.1% to 13.6%) and 3;6 (7.5%) was consistent with prior estimates of LI at these ages. The percentage of preterms at risk for LI at 2;6 (16.1% to 24.1%) and 3;6 (34.4%) was higher at both ages and statistically significant at 3;6 (difference = 26.8%, 95% CI = 12.3% to 41.4%). The best model predicting risk status at 3;6 was preterms' mean length of utterance (MLU) at 2;6, (sensitivity 72.73%, specificity 85%) when adjusting for maternal education.

Conclusion

Preterms exhibit a heightened risk for LI in the preschool years, since about one in four preterms at 2;6 and one in three preterms at 3;6 experiences significant lags in language acquisition. Findings argue the importance of early identification of language difficulties among preterms coupled with implementation of systematic language-focused interventions for these youngsters.

Section snippets

Participants

This study involved 126 Italian children (64 very immature preterms, 62 full-terms) comprising three sub-samples. A preterm sample consisting of 64 children was assessed longitudinally at 2;6 and 3;6, whereas two control samples of full-terms were ascertained to provide cross-sectional references for the preterms at 2;6 (n = 22) and 3;6 (n = 40).

Results

Descriptive information about the language abilities of preterms relative to full-terms at 2;6 and 3;6 appear in Table 1. At 2;6, independent-samples t tests showed no significant differences (all ps > 0.15) between preterms and full-terms on the language or cognition measures, as we have reported previously [17]. The effect of group was not significant for PVB Total Words, PVB Complete Sentences, PRF MLU and the Stanford-Binet IQ, when adjusting for maternal level of education [2-way MANOVA test

Discussion

An ample literature on the circumstances surrounding preterm birth shows that these youngsters face an increased risk for a number of adverse outcomes that transcend both physical (e.g., cerebral palsy) [41] and cognitive dimensions of development [1]. Of relevance to this study, a number of research findings have suggested that preterms exhibit a substantially heightened risk for LI during early childhood [14], [26]. As we discussed previously, LI refers to a specific or nonspecific impairment

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the children and parents for their participation in the research and Giulia Aquilano for help with the medical examination.

Funding: This research was supported by research grants from University of Bologna: Basic Oriented Research ex 60% 2004, 2005, 2006; Strategic Project 2007–2009 “Early communicative-linguistic and cognitive abilities: risks linked to preterm birth”. This research was also supported by a national research grant PRIN 2008 “Gestures and language in

References (47)

  • S.R. Zubrick et al.

    Late language emergence at 24 months: an epidemiological study of prevalence, predictors, and covariates

    J Speech Lang Hear Res

    (2007)
  • H. Catts et al.

    A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments

    J Speech Lang Hear Res

    (2002)
  • L.E. Skibbe et al.

    Reading trajectories of children with specific language impairment from preschool through fifth grade

    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch

    (2008)
  • B.B. Fazio et al.

    Tracking children from poverty at risk for specific language impairment: a 3-year longitudinal study

    J Speech Lang Hear Res

    (1996)
  • S. Redmond et al.

    The socioemotional behaviors of children with SLI: social adaptation or social deviance?

    J Speech Lang Hear Res

    (1998)
  • J. Briscoe et al.

    Short-term memory and language outcomes after extreme prematurity at birth

    J Speech Lang Hear Res

    (1998)
  • E. Jansson-Verkasalo et al.

    Language development in very low birth weight preterm children: a follow-up study

    Folia Phoniatr Logop

    (2004)
  • S. Stolt et al.

    Size and composition of the lexicon in prematurely born very-low-birth-weight and fullterm Finnish children at two years of age

    J Child Lang

    (2007)
  • A. Sansavini et al.

    Early relations between lexical and grammatical development in very immature Italian preterms

    J Child Lang

    (2006)
  • F. Gayraud et al.

    Influence of preterm birth on early lexical and grammatical acquisition

    First Lang

    (2007)
  • S. Foster-Cohen et al.

    Early delayed language development in very preterm infants: evidence from the MacArthur–Bates CDI

    J Child Lang

    (2007)
  • J. Reynell

    Reynell developmental language scales

    (1977)
  • J. Heilman et al.

    Utility of the Macarthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory in identifying language abilities of late-talking and typically developing toddlers

    Am J Speech Lang Pathol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (101)

    • Deficits in neural encoding of speech in preterm infants

      2023, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Cognitive and motor development in preterm children from 6 to 36 months of age: Trajectories, risk factors and predictability

      2022, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      The advancement in perinatal care has significantly improved the survival of preterm infants born very low birth weight (VLBW, birth weight < 1500 g), however their vulnerability to neonatal diseases and neurodevelopmental disability remains a concern [1–4]. Preterm infants born VLBW are at a higher risk of poor motor, cognitive, language and behavioral functions from infancy to school age than their term peers [5–10]. Furthermore, analyses of developmental outcome in preterm infants during recent eras showed a decline in the risk of major developmental disability together with no change or an incline in the risk of mild to moderate developmental disabilities over time [11–14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text