Review
Diabetes self-management education and support for adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108480Get rights and content

Highlights

  • DSMES for newly diagnosed T2DM might affect patient-centered outcomes.

  • The glycemic control significantly improved vs usual care.

  • Psychosocial and behavioral effects are inconclusive.

  • Further studies with higher precision using standardized measurements are required.

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to identify the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) among adults within 12 months of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and other sources up to March 2019 to detect randomized controlled trials in the last decade based on the global guidelines’ definition of DSMES. Data were categorized into biomedical, psychosocial, and behavioral outcomes and synthesized using a random-effects model. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. We scrutinized 12 studies that enrolled 2,386 adults with newly diagnosed T2DM. Biomedical outcomes presented the pooled effects of HbA1c −0.21% (95% confidence interval, −0.38, −0.04), body weight −2.36 kg (−5.77, 1.05), and waist circumference −1.8 cm (−5.63, 2.04) when the data from the two studies with low risk of bias were combined (N = 1,082). Psychosocial and behavioral effects were inconclusive owing to mixed results from various scales and reporting. The quality of the body of evidence was low. DSMES within 12 months of T2DM diagnosis might affect patient-centered outcomes. Further studies with higher precision using standardized measurement methods are required.

Introduction

The number of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been increasing worldwide. This number is estimated to exceed 600 million by 2040 [1], [2]. In many cases, T2DM progresses asymptomatically. Approximately half of those diagnosed with T2DM have developed one or more diabetes complications at the time of diagnosis [2].

To control T2DM and its complications, the international and national guidelines recommend that diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) be provided to people with T2DM around the time of diagnosis [3], [4], [5], [6]. According to the guidelines, DSMES is defined as “the ongoing process of facilitating the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for diabetes self-care as well as providing ongoing support to sustain the self-management gains made by patients as a result of education” [3], [4], [5].

Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported that educational interventions for people with T2DM improved their glycemic control, weight loss, diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy, quality of life, dietary behavior, physical activity, and smoking cessation [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. However, there is no integrated evidence on the effectiveness of DSMES specifically among people with newly diagnosed T2DM.

Revealing whether DSMES is effective in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM can contribute to more feasible disease control from the time of diagnosis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that measured the effectiveness of DSMES in adults within 12 months of T2DM diagnosis on biomedical, psychosocial, and behavioral outcomes compared with the usual care.

Section snippets

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [14]. It complies with the AMSTAR-2 tool for critically appraising systematic reviews of RCTs [15] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [16]. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019132723).

Search results

The search yielded 3,350 potentially relevant articles from the databases and other sources. Following dual screening of 187 full-text articles, 12 studies were included in this systematic review of which five were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 1). The main reason for the exclusion of studies following full-text screening was that the study participants also included those with established diabetes (>12 months) or prediabetes.

Twelve studies describing eight original interventions were

Discussion

The present systematic review identified the effectiveness of DSMES within 12 months of the initial T2DM diagnosis on biomedical, psychosocial, and behavioral outcomes, compared to the usual care. Among the patient-centered outcomes, biomedical ones were most common across the reviewed studies. The pooled effect of DSMES on glycemic control was significant, and this was confirmed in the sensitivity analysis. The effect size on glycemic control may have been smaller in our review compared to

Funding

This work was supported by the Japan Academy of Diabetes Education and Nursing [grant number 201601]. The study funder had no input into the study design or analysis, nor the interpretation of data.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study concept and design. R.T. and T.S. performed the review processes. R.T. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Chie Kimura and the librarians of the medical library, University of Tsukuba, for their technical support with literature searches. We are grateful to Prof. Erika Ota of Cochrane Japan for her advice on data synthesis.

References (45)

  • E. Heinrich et al.

    Self-management interventions for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

    Eur Diabetes Nurs

    (2010)
  • T. Deakin et al.

    Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2005)
  • A. Steinsbekk et al.

    Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis

    BMC Health Serv Res

    (2012)
  • L. Minet et al.

    Mediating the effect of self-care management intervention in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of 47 randomised controlled trials

    Patient Educ Couns

    (2009)
  • J. Tshiananga et al.

    The effect of nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis

    Diabetes Educ

    (2012)
  • J. Pillay et al.

    Behavioral programs for type 2 diabetes mellitus A systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Ann Intern Med

    (2015)
  • Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: the Cochrane Collaboration; 2011,...
  • B.J. Shea et al.

    AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

    BMJ

    (2017)
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, PRISMA Grp, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews...
  • S. Michie et al.

    The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions

    Ann Behav Med

    (2013)
  • Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Hróbjartsson A, Boutron I, et al. A revised tool for assessing risk of...
  • J.A.C. Sterne et al.

    RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

    BMJ (Clinical Research ed.)

    (2019)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Lower education and immigrant background are associated with lower participation in a diabetes education program – Insights from adult patients in the Outcomes & Multi-morbidity In Type 2 diabetes cohort (OMIT)

      2023, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Healthy lifestyle behaviours to prevent or postpone T2DM complications are essential [8], and the ADA guidelines emphasise that individuals with diabetes should participate in diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) [8]. Systematic reviews of DSMES-studies reported that self-management education was associated with improved HbA1c [9,10], another systematic review and meta-analysis reported that DSMES could reduce the all-cause mortality risk in people with T2DM [11]. A diagnosis with T2DM is a key time point of implementing DSMES [12], and in Norway, general practitioners (GPs) should inform all those newly diagnosed about their right to be referred to a free diabetes educational programme, called diabetes start course [13].

    • Educational programs in type 2 diabetes designed for community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review

      2022, Geriatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      These standards do not endorse any one approach but rather seek to define the commonalities among effective and evidence-based DSMES strategies.36 Traditionally, programs tended to focus on knowledge and glycemic control39 and more recent reviews reported a biomedical predominance.10,11,15,41 In our review we found a balance between psychosocial, behavioral and clinical outcomes and few reporting knowledge outcomes.

    • Effectiveness of training in disease management for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

      2022, Endocrinologia, Diabetes y Nutricion
      Citation Excerpt :

      The development of self-management leads to a decrease in HbA1c levels and complications, and as a result, the quality of life is improved.58 To improve self-management in diabetes, three-month (or longer) training and follow-up studies are recommended.60 It was shown that the duration of training and follow-up were longer in the studies examining the concepts of self-management, lifestyle change and quality of life.53,61,62

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text