The rapidly evolving therapies for advanced melanoma—Towards immunotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and beyond

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.12.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We updated recent achievements and current treatment options with immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for advanced melanoma.

  • We discussed the opportunities as well as the challenges of using these novel therapies.

  • We further extended our discussion to the cutting edge research topics for advanced melanoma.

Abstract

The incidence of melanoma in both males and females continues to rise during the past 40 years despite the stable or declining trends for most cancer types. Due to the tremendous advance in immunobiology and molecular biology, breakthroughs in both immunotherapies and molecular targeted therapies have recently revolutionized the standard of care for patients with advanced melanoma. In 2011, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ipilimumab, an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibody for metastatic melanoma therapy. Since then, novel drugs including antibodies to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab (both approved in 2014), selective BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib (approved in 2011), dabrafenib (approved in 2013); and MEK inhibitor trametinib (approved in 2013), have greatly extended the potential of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for advanced melanoma. All of which have been demonstrated a significant increase in overall survival rate, and long-term benefits in multiple large clinical trials. Several new agents and novel therapies are currently under phase III clinical trials with the hope of being approved in the near future. We already entered a golden era in oncology that are providing significant survival improvement. In the meantime, new challenges for clinicians also started to emerge. In this review, we presented the existing evidence for the newest treatments for advanced melanoma, including CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF, MEK inhibitors. We also discussed the strengths, limitations and challenges of using these novel therapies, and potential solutions as well as highlighted the areas requiring further research.

Introduction

The incidence of melanoma in both males and females continues to rise during the past 40 years despite the stable or declining trends for most cancer types (Siegel et al., 2014). The main cause of death in melanoma patients is widespread metastases to the lymphatic system and other organs such as lung, liver, bone, and brain. The average survival time with metastatic melanoma was 6–12 months and a 5-year survival rate under 10% with traditional therapies (Agarwala, 2009, Balch et al., 2009). According to the most recent data from 2005 to 2011, the National Cancer Institute’s SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program database showed a 5-year survival rate of 16% for metastatic melanoma (Overview of the SEER program, 2015). Due to its aggressive nature and resistance to treatment, significant efforts have been emphasized on prevention by educating the public about the dangers of excess UV exposure from both the sun and tanning beds (Curiel-Lewandrowski et al., 2012). However, the treatment of this devastating skin cancer had little to no advancement for the past 4 decades until recently. Dacarbazine remained to be the only first-line treatment for advanced melanoma since its approval by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1976. It showed a 10–20% of overall response rate in phase I and II trials with no clear overall survival (OS) benefits (Falkson et al., 1998, Middleton et al., 2000, Avril et al., 2004). High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2), which was approved by US FDA in 1998 on the basis of durable overall response rate of 13–16%, is not considered a standard-of-care due to its toxicity and lack of phase III data (Schwartzentruber et al., 2011). Thanks to the tremendous progress in understanding of immunobiology and the molecular signaling pathway of melanoma development, breakthroughs in both immunotherapies and molecular targeted therapies have revolutionized the standard of care for patients with advanced melanoma. A golden era for advanced melanoma treatment has already began. The approval of anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody ipilimumab by US FDA in 2011, as well as the new drugs including antibodies to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab (both approved in 2014) and selective BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib (approved in 2011), dabrafenib (approved in 2013); and MEK inhibitor trametinib (approved in 2013), have greatly extended the potential of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for advanced melanoma. All of which have shown a significant increase in progression free and overall survival rate with long-term benefits in a proportion of patients compared with chemotherapy in multiple large clinical trials. In addition, several novel modalities such as adoptive T cell therapy (ACT), chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) T cell therapy, oncolytic virotherapy and therapeutic vaccines for advanced melanoma are currently under investigation with the hope of providing us with more exciting results in the near future. Advances in these novel therapies have brought us an opportunity to cure this devastating disease. Meantime, they also raised new challenging for clinicians. In this review, we will discuss the strengths, limitations and challenges of using the current standard of care with these novel drugs for patients with advanced melanoma, and potential solutions as well as areas requiring further research.

Section snippets

Immunotherapy

Melanoma study has been at the cutting edge of immuno-oncology research for the past three decades due to the high rate of spontaneous regression of the primary melanoma as well as vitiligo associated with melanoma regression (Sumner, 1953, Printz, 2001). Dr. Steven Rosenberg (NCI/NIH, USA) is one of the pioneers to show solid evidence of immune-induced tumor regression. Along with his efforts, high dose (HD) IL-2 became the first immunotherapy drug approved by US FDA for advanced melanoma in

Signal transduction inhibitors: molecular targeted therapy

Thanks to our further understanding of molecular mechanisms of regulating cell growth and death as well as genetic mutations in carcinogenesis, concurrently with the tremendous advance of immunotherapy is the significant success of molecular targeted therapies for advanced melanoma. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which promotes cell growth, differentiation and survival, is one of the most important signaling pathways involving tumor development. Davies et al. (2002) first

Specific situation: melanoma brain metastases

Brain metastases are frequently found in patients with melanoma. It was reported that around 7% of patients with melanoma presented with brain involvement at the initial diagnosis (Amer et al., 1978). If left untreated, the median overall survival of patients with brain metastases is often less than 3 months (Fonkem et al., 2012). Due to the poor penetration of cytotoxic drugs across the blood–brain barrier, treatment options for brain metastases have been restricted to surgery and radiotherapy

The ultimate solution: combining immunotherapy with molecular targeted therapy or other therapies?

While we witness the emergence and growth of two effective but fundamentally different therapeutic strategies for advanced melanoma during the last few years, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses. Molecular targeted therapy often leads to rapid and remarkable responses in majority of patients with the targeted mutation, but clinical benefit is usually transient due to the rapid emergence of drug resistance. Single BRAF inhibitor or dual BRAF and MEK inhibitor yield disease control

Conclusions

The treatment of advanced melanoma is evolving rapidly as our understanding of the biology of the disease and immune regulation accumulates. Melanoma has entered a golden age of therapeutics with multiple recent groundbreaking studies. Now, with the perspective discover of more targets and developing new drugs, we are toward the development of a personalized approach and to finally deliver curative therapies to patients with advanced disease.

Funding

This manuscript was not funded by any specific grant.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Dr. Ziqiang Zhu obtained his M.D. degree from Zhejiang University School of Medicine in China. He then went to Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) studying pathophysiology and received an M.S. degree. Upon graduation, Dr. Zhu became interested in oncology and came to the National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) to study cancer immunotherapy. Currently, he is a resident in internal medicine at the Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center in New York.

References (125)

  • G.A. McArthur et al.

    Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study

    Lancet Oncol.

    (2014)
  • D. McDermott et al.

    Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma patients surviving more than 2 years following treatment in a phase III trial (MDX010-20)

    Ann. Oncol.

    (2013)
  • T. Petrella et al.

    Single-agent interleukin-2 in the treatment of metastatic melanoma: a systematic review

    Cancer Treat. Rev.

    (2007)
  • C. Robert et al.

    Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • S.S. Agarwala

    Current systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma

    Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.

    (2009)
  • M.H. Amer et al.

    Malignant melanoma and central nervous system metastases: incidence, diagnosis, treatment and survival

    Cancer

    (1978)
  • R.H. Andtbacka et al.

    Talimogene laherparepvec improves durable response rate in patients with advanced melanoma

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2015)
  • P. Attia et al.

    Autoimmunity correlates with tumor regression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2005)
  • M.F. Avril et al.

    Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: a phase III study

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2004)
  • M.W. Azer et al.

    Patterns of response and progression in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma metastatic to the brain who were treated with dabrafenib

    Cancer

    (2014)
  • C.M. Balch et al.

    Final version of AJCC melanoma staging and classification

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2009)
  • D.M. Barrett et al.

    Chimeric antigen receptor therapy for cancer

    Annu. Rev. Med.

    (2014)
  • G. Berthod et al.

    Pulmonary sarcoid-like granulomatosis induced by ipilimumab

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2012)
  • C. Blank et al.

    PD-L1/B7H-1 inhibits the effector phase of tumor rejection by T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic CD8+ T cells

    Cancer Res.

    (2004)
  • I. Bot et al.

    Neurological immune-related adverse events of ipilimumab

    Pract. Neurol.

    (2013)
  • M.K. Callahan et al.

    Progression of RAS-mutant leukemia during RAF inhibitor treatment

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2012)
  • R.D. Carvajal et al.

    KIT as a therapeutic target in metastatic melanoma

    JAMA

    (2011)
  • P.B. Chapman et al.

    Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2011)
  • P.B. Chapman et al.

    Rapid eradication of a bulky melanoma mass with one dose of immunotherapy

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2015)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2013)
  • C. Curiel-Lewandrowski et al.

    Screening and prevention measures for melanoma: is there a survival advantage?

    Curr. Oncol. Rep.

    (2012)
  • M.A. Curran et al.

    PD-1 and CTLA-4 combination blockade expands infiltrating T cells and reduces regulatory T and myeloid cells within B16 melanoma tumors

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2010)
  • J.A. Curtin et al.

    Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2005)
  • H. Davies et al.

    Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer

    Nature

    (2002)
  • G. Della Vittoria Scarpati et al.

    Ipilimumab in the treatment of metastatic melanoma: management of adverse events

    Oncol. Targets Ther.

    (2014)
  • F. de Rosa et al.

    Vaccination with autologous dendritic cells loaded with autologous tumor lysate or homogenate combined with immunomodulating radiotherapy and/or preleukapheresis IFN-alpha in patients with metastatic melanoma: a randomised proof-of-principle phase II study

    J. Transl. Med.

    (2014)
  • M.A. Dickson

    Molecular pathways: CDK4 inhibitors for cancer therapy

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2014)
  • S.G. Downey et al.

    Prognostic factors related to clinical response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by CTL-associated antigen-4 blockade

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2007)
  • R. Dummer et al.

    A randomized controlled comparison of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma

    J. Transl. Med.

    (2015)
  • G.P. Dunn et al.

    Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape

    Nat. Immunol.

    (2002)
  • J. Duraiswamy et al.

    Dual blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 combined with tumor vaccine effectively restores T-cell rejection function in tumors

    Cancer Res.

    (2013)
  • C.M. Emery et al.

    MEK1 mutations confer resistance to MEK and B-RAF inhibition

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2009)
  • F. Fadel et al.

    Anti-CTLA4 antibody-induced lupus nephritis

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2009)
  • C.I. Falkson et al.

    Phase III trial of dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b versus dacarbazine with tamoxifen versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b and tamoxifen in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: an eastern cooperative oncology group study

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1998)
  • K.T. Flaherty et al.

    Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2012)
  • K.T. Flaherty et al.

    Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2012)
  • E. Fonkem et al.

    Melanoma brain metastasis: overview of current management and emerging targeted therapies

    Expert Rev. Neurother.

    (2012)
  • P.M. Forde et al.

    Ipilimumab-induced immune-related renal failure? A case report

    Anticancer Res.

    (2012)
  • G.J. Freeman et al.

    Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation

    J. Exp. Med.

    (2000)
  • A. Gallois et al.

    Reversal of natural killer cell exhaustion by TIM-3 blockade

    Oncoimmunology

    (2014)
  • Cited by (81)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr. Ziqiang Zhu obtained his M.D. degree from Zhejiang University School of Medicine in China. He then went to Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) studying pathophysiology and received an M.S. degree. Upon graduation, Dr. Zhu became interested in oncology and came to the National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) to study cancer immunotherapy. Currently, he is a resident in internal medicine at the Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center in New York.

    View full text