Drug interactions between antineoplastic and antiretroviral therapies: Implications and management for clinical practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite the impact of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related mortality, malignancies remain the second most common cause of death in HIV infection in developed countries. In addition to the AIDS-defining malignancies, other cancers such as Hodgkin's lymphoma and anal cancer, are more frequent in HIV-infected patients who survive longer even though they do not have complete immune restoration The use of concomitant antineoplastic chemotherapy and cART have been demonstrated to be feasible and effective in patients with HIV-related malignancies; however, many drugs used in cART regimens have the potential for causing drug interactions as a result of their ability to either inhibit or induce the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. Since many antineoplastic drugs are also metabolised by the CYP system, co-administration with cART could result in either drug accumulation and possible toxicity, or rapid drug metabolism and decreased efficacy. Unfortunately, very limited prospective interaction data are available to safely guide the combined use of cART and chemotherapy. This paper reviews the potential drug interactions and therapeutic considerations of the antiretroviral agents used to treat HIV and the most common anticancer agents used in the treatment of malignancies found in patients with HIV infection.

Introduction

Since the onset of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in the early 1980s, HIV infection and cancer have been closely interrelated. Several reasons explain this phenomenon: the immune suppression induced by HIV favors occurrence of cancers such as high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL); the oncogenic nature of certain viruses, which directly cause cancers such as HHV8 and Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) and human papilloma virus and cervical cancer in women or rectal squamous cell cancer in men. Because many of these tumors have such a high prevalence in HIV-infected persons, they are included as part of the clinical definition of AIDS and are reported formally as “AIDS-defining malignancies”. The spectacular progress demonstrated by controlling HIV replication in the vast majority of patients receiving combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) has resulted in several changes in the epidemiology of malignancies in HIV disease. First there has been a large decrease in the prevalence of AIDS-defining malignancies even though lymphomas and Kaposi's sarcoma remain the most frequent [1], [2]. Secondly, the increase in survival of HIV-infected patients has led to the observation in several cohort studies that an increasing number of “non-AIDS-defining” malignancies, such as Hodgkin's disease (HD), invasive anal carcinoma, lung carcinoma, skin cancer and hepatocarcinoma, are now being reported at higher than expected frequencies compared to rates observed in the general population [1], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Not only are these tumors more frequent than they used to be in the HIV-infected population, but several epidemiological studies have now established that HIV-infected patients are at higher risk of developing these malignancies than in the non-HIV-infected population [6], [7]. The risk factors for HIV-infected persons with non-AIDS-defining cancers are multi-factorial, and include lifestyle habits (smoking and sun exposure), HIV itself, co-infection with oncogenic viruses (human papilloma virus, hepatitis B and C virus, and Epstein Barr virus), and possibly drugs or medications [7], [8]. HIV infection represents both a cause for immune suppression, which itself favors carcinogenesis and a major cause for deleterious chronic immune activation and inflammation which may also trigger carcinogenic pathways. Interesting data from the Cohorte Aquitaine in France suggests that the two different categories of malignancies observed throughout HIV infection may be related to two different profiles: time spent with a low CD4 cell count and exposure to a high viral load [9]. Both conditions are associated with a higher risk for developing AIDS-related cancers while the time spent with CD4 counts under 500 cells/mm3 or with viral load greater than 500 copies/ml are associated with a higher risk for non-AIDS-defining malignancies [4]. Furthermore, cancers occurring in HIV-infected patients tends to occur at a younger age than expected and to be more aggressive [10].

These findings lead clinicians responsible for the care of HIV-infected patients to look for early cancer detection tools and adaptive therapeutic strategies. The use of concomitant chemotherapy and cART has been demonstrated to be feasible and effective in reducing morbidity associated with opportunistic infections and to improve overall survival in patients with HIV-related malignancies [9], [11], [12]. Treatment with cART, however is complicated by potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions are much more common because of the nature of HAART drug metabolism and particularly the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and the protease inhibitors (PIs), which are extensively metabolised via the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme system and may also be inhibitors or inducers of CYP450. While numerous interactions of varying clinical significance have been described with these antiretroviral drugs [13], less is known about the potential for drug interactions with antineoplastic agents. Since many anticancer agents are metabolised to some degree by the CYP system [14], concomitant cART use might result in either drug accumulation and possible toxicity, or decreased efficacy of one or both groups of agents. No specific recommendations exist and clinicians must make decisions despite the missing data by applying greater attention to the choice of chemotherapy protocols and the usual predictive surrogate markers of HIV disease, such as CD4 cell counts and viral load.

This paper reviews the potential interactions and subsequent therapeutic considerations between antiretroviral drugs and the most common neoplastic agents used in the treatment of AIDS-related malignancies assuming that specific pharmacokinetic information on the drug–drug interactions is limited, much can be predicted from the known metabolism of these agents.

Section snippets

Anticancer treatment overview

The guiding principle of anticancer strategy includes local tumor control by surgery and/or radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy to prevent or treat metastatic disease. The most significant innovations in medical oncology include: characterization of molecular oncogenes and their roles in cancers, design and screening of drugs (from a large spectrum anti-DNA chemotherapy to specific monoclonal antibody or targeted small molecules), identification of the potential tumor targets,

HAART drug metabolism

There are two recommended cART strategies that offer similar efficacy with different toxicity profile and genetic barrier to resistance. They include a backbone of two NRTIs that may be combined in the same once-daily pill (mostly tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine) with either a NNRTI (mostly efavirenz once a day) or a ritonavir-boosted PI (atazanavir, lopinavir, fosamprenavir, and saquinavir). CYP450 is a metabolic enzyme system responsible for eliminating many drugs from the

HAART and chemotherapy drug interactions

Drug interactions in oncology are of particular importance owing to the narrow therapeutic index and the inherent toxicity of anticancer agents [27], [28]. Since PIs and NNRTIs are modulators of the CYP system, the numerous antineoplastic agents that are CYP substrates may have their efficacy and/or toxicity profiles affected in a detrimental manner (Table 2). Interpatient variability is also an important factor that can influence drug interactions. Important variables are gender, age, genetics

Other types of interactions

Antiretroviral-mediated modulation of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) may provide another mechanism whereby the pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents can be altered. Expressed in the kidney, intestine, liver and central nervous system, Pgp plays a protective role by either limiting uptake or enhancing the efflux of a substrate. In vitro studies demonstrated that PIs could also interfere with the activity of Pgp or multi-drug resistance proteins (MRP) [67], which are also involved in cellular efflux of a

Conclusion

The emerging reports of malignancies, including non-AIDS-defining malignancies, represent a new and difficult challenge in the care of patients with HIV. These malignancies obviously have multi-factorial risk elements that are either environmental or stem from lifestyle behaviour (smoking) or oncogenic viruses. Some features remain common, with generally aggressive behaviour, and the optimal treatment protocols are not therefore adhered to and drug–drug interactions must be a concern. Many

Conflict of interest statement

Authors have no conflict of interest statement, disclosing any financial or personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this work.

Reviewers

Prof. Umberto Tirelli, National Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Via Franco Gallini 2, I-33081 Aviano (PN), Italy.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Maryse Berlion for editing the English.

Dr. Nicolas Mounier M.D., Ph.D. is professor of Medical Oncology in Nice. He graduated in hospital St Louis, Paris. His mentors were Prof. C. Gisselbrecht and Prof. E. Lepage. Most of his work focuses on diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas in collaboration with the GELA (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adultes). At the present time, within the HIV framework, he particularly studies the impact of dose-intensity on tumor response assessed by PET imaging.

References (77)

  • G. Toffoli et al.

    Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    Ann Oncol

    (2004)
  • C. Delbaldo

    Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamics relationships of imatinib (Glivec)

    Therapie

    (2007)
  • J.P. Spano et al.

    AIDS and non-AIDS-related malignancies: a new vexing challenge in HIV-positive patients. Part I. Kaposi's sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma

    Eur J Intern Med

    (2002)
  • J.P. Spano et al.

    AIDS and non-AIDS-related malignancies: a new vexing challenge in HIV-positive patients. Part II. Cervical and anal squamous epithelial lesions, lung cancer, testicular germ cell cancers, and skin cancers

    Eur J Intern Med

    (2002)
  • R.J. Biggar et al.

    Risk of other cancers following Kaposi's sarcoma: relation to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1994)
  • E.A. Engels et al.

    Trends in cancer risk among people with AIDS in the United States 1980–2002

    AIDS

    (2006)
  • F. Bonnet et al.

    Malignancy-related causes of death in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy

    Cancer

    (2004)
  • G.M. Clifford et al.

    Cancer risk in the Swiss HIV cohort study: associations with immunodeficiency, smoking, and highly active antiretroviral therapy

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2005)
  • M. Herida et al.

    Incidence of non-AIDS-defining cancers before and during the highly active antiretroviral therapy era in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • D. Costagliola

    Cancer risk and mortality for patients with HIV in the combination antiretroviral therapy era: evolving epidemiology

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • L. Pantanowitz et al.

    The growing problem of non-AIDS-defining malignancies in HIV

    Curr Opin Oncol

    (2006)
  • M. Bruyand et al.

    Immunodeficiency and risk of AIDS-defining and non-AIDS-defining cancers: ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort, 1998 to 2006

  • R.J. Biggar et al.

    Survival after cancer diagnosis in persons with AIDS

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (2005)
  • N. Mounier et al.

    Modern management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in HIV-infected patients

    Br J Haematol

    (2007)
  • M. Barry et al.

    Pharmacokinetics and potential interactions amongst antiretroviral agents used to treat patients with HIV infection

    Clin Pharmacokinet

    (1999)
  • D.W. Northfelt et al.

    Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: results of a randomized phase III clinical trial

    J Clin Oncol

    (1998)
  • S. Stewart et al.

    Randomized comparative trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus bleomycin and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. International Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Study Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (1998)
  • P.S. Gill et al.

    Randomized phase III trial of liposomal daunorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (1996)
  • P.S. Gill et al.

    Paclitaxel is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • L. Welles et al.

    Phase II trial with dose titration of paclitaxel for the therapy of human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi's sarcoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (1998)
  • E. Vaccher et al.

    Concomitant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy plus highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma

    Cancer

    (2001)
  • F. Boue et al.

    Phase II trial of CHOP plus rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • DHHS Adults and Adolescents Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines Panel's – US Guideline 2008. New York State Department...
  • J.J. Faragon et al.

    Drug interactions associated with HAART: focus on treatments for addiction and recreational drugs

    AIDS Read

    (2003)
  • C.D. Scripture et al.

    Drug interactions in cancer therapy

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2006)
  • T. Antoniou et al.

    Interactions between antiretrovirals and antineoplastic drug therapy

    Clin Pharmacokinet

    (2005)
  • T. Cresteil et al.

    Taxol metabolism by human liver microsomes: identification of cytochrome P450 isozymes involved in its biotransformation

    Cancer Res

    (1994)
  • A.P. Venook et al.

    Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of paclitaxel in patients with hepatic dysfunction: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9264

    J Clin Oncol

    (1998)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Inhibition of HIV-1 entry by the tricyclic coumarin GUT-70 through the modification of membrane fluidity

      2015, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, malignant lymphoma is still a severe and frequent complication in HIV-1-infected patients [33,34]. AIDS-related lymphoma has an extremely aggressive clinical course [35,36] and most anti-tumor reagents have drug–drug interactions with anti-HIV-1 reagents [37], leading to difficulties in the treatment of AIDS-related lymphoma. Since GUT-70 has anti-lymphoma and leukemia activities [10,11] in addition to its anti-HIV-1 effects, it is expected to be applied as a key drug in the prevention and treatment of related malignancies.

    • Navigating the Nexus: HIV and Breast Cancer—A Critical Review

      2024, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr. Nicolas Mounier M.D., Ph.D. is professor of Medical Oncology in Nice. He graduated in hospital St Louis, Paris. His mentors were Prof. C. Gisselbrecht and Prof. E. Lepage. Most of his work focuses on diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas in collaboration with the GELA (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adultes). At the present time, within the HIV framework, he particularly studies the impact of dose-intensity on tumor response assessed by PET imaging.

    Part of this study was presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1–5 June 2007, Chicago, USA.

    1

    On behalf of the Onco-VIH consortium; http://www.ccde.fr.

    View full text