Drug interactions between antineoplastic and antiretroviral therapies: Implications and management for clinical practice☆
Introduction
Since the onset of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in the early 1980s, HIV infection and cancer have been closely interrelated. Several reasons explain this phenomenon: the immune suppression induced by HIV favors occurrence of cancers such as high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL); the oncogenic nature of certain viruses, which directly cause cancers such as HHV8 and Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) and human papilloma virus and cervical cancer in women or rectal squamous cell cancer in men. Because many of these tumors have such a high prevalence in HIV-infected persons, they are included as part of the clinical definition of AIDS and are reported formally as “AIDS-defining malignancies”. The spectacular progress demonstrated by controlling HIV replication in the vast majority of patients receiving combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) has resulted in several changes in the epidemiology of malignancies in HIV disease. First there has been a large decrease in the prevalence of AIDS-defining malignancies even though lymphomas and Kaposi's sarcoma remain the most frequent [1], [2]. Secondly, the increase in survival of HIV-infected patients has led to the observation in several cohort studies that an increasing number of “non-AIDS-defining” malignancies, such as Hodgkin's disease (HD), invasive anal carcinoma, lung carcinoma, skin cancer and hepatocarcinoma, are now being reported at higher than expected frequencies compared to rates observed in the general population [1], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Not only are these tumors more frequent than they used to be in the HIV-infected population, but several epidemiological studies have now established that HIV-infected patients are at higher risk of developing these malignancies than in the non-HIV-infected population [6], [7]. The risk factors for HIV-infected persons with non-AIDS-defining cancers are multi-factorial, and include lifestyle habits (smoking and sun exposure), HIV itself, co-infection with oncogenic viruses (human papilloma virus, hepatitis B and C virus, and Epstein Barr virus), and possibly drugs or medications [7], [8]. HIV infection represents both a cause for immune suppression, which itself favors carcinogenesis and a major cause for deleterious chronic immune activation and inflammation which may also trigger carcinogenic pathways. Interesting data from the Cohorte Aquitaine in France suggests that the two different categories of malignancies observed throughout HIV infection may be related to two different profiles: time spent with a low CD4 cell count and exposure to a high viral load [9]. Both conditions are associated with a higher risk for developing AIDS-related cancers while the time spent with CD4 counts under 500 cells/mm3 or with viral load greater than 500 copies/ml are associated with a higher risk for non-AIDS-defining malignancies [4]. Furthermore, cancers occurring in HIV-infected patients tends to occur at a younger age than expected and to be more aggressive [10].
These findings lead clinicians responsible for the care of HIV-infected patients to look for early cancer detection tools and adaptive therapeutic strategies. The use of concomitant chemotherapy and cART has been demonstrated to be feasible and effective in reducing morbidity associated with opportunistic infections and to improve overall survival in patients with HIV-related malignancies [9], [11], [12]. Treatment with cART, however is complicated by potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions are much more common because of the nature of HAART drug metabolism and particularly the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and the protease inhibitors (PIs), which are extensively metabolised via the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme system and may also be inhibitors or inducers of CYP450. While numerous interactions of varying clinical significance have been described with these antiretroviral drugs [13], less is known about the potential for drug interactions with antineoplastic agents. Since many anticancer agents are metabolised to some degree by the CYP system [14], concomitant cART use might result in either drug accumulation and possible toxicity, or decreased efficacy of one or both groups of agents. No specific recommendations exist and clinicians must make decisions despite the missing data by applying greater attention to the choice of chemotherapy protocols and the usual predictive surrogate markers of HIV disease, such as CD4 cell counts and viral load.
This paper reviews the potential interactions and subsequent therapeutic considerations between antiretroviral drugs and the most common neoplastic agents used in the treatment of AIDS-related malignancies assuming that specific pharmacokinetic information on the drug–drug interactions is limited, much can be predicted from the known metabolism of these agents.
Section snippets
Anticancer treatment overview
The guiding principle of anticancer strategy includes local tumor control by surgery and/or radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy to prevent or treat metastatic disease. The most significant innovations in medical oncology include: characterization of molecular oncogenes and their roles in cancers, design and screening of drugs (from a large spectrum anti-DNA chemotherapy to specific monoclonal antibody or targeted small molecules), identification of the potential tumor targets,
HAART drug metabolism
There are two recommended cART strategies that offer similar efficacy with different toxicity profile and genetic barrier to resistance. They include a backbone of two NRTIs that may be combined in the same once-daily pill (mostly tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine) with either a NNRTI (mostly efavirenz once a day) or a ritonavir-boosted PI (atazanavir, lopinavir, fosamprenavir, and saquinavir). CYP450 is a metabolic enzyme system responsible for eliminating many drugs from the
HAART and chemotherapy drug interactions
Drug interactions in oncology are of particular importance owing to the narrow therapeutic index and the inherent toxicity of anticancer agents [27], [28]. Since PIs and NNRTIs are modulators of the CYP system, the numerous antineoplastic agents that are CYP substrates may have their efficacy and/or toxicity profiles affected in a detrimental manner (Table 2). Interpatient variability is also an important factor that can influence drug interactions. Important variables are gender, age, genetics
Other types of interactions
Antiretroviral-mediated modulation of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) may provide another mechanism whereby the pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents can be altered. Expressed in the kidney, intestine, liver and central nervous system, Pgp plays a protective role by either limiting uptake or enhancing the efflux of a substrate. In vitro studies demonstrated that PIs could also interfere with the activity of Pgp or multi-drug resistance proteins (MRP) [67], which are also involved in cellular efflux of a
Conclusion
The emerging reports of malignancies, including non-AIDS-defining malignancies, represent a new and difficult challenge in the care of patients with HIV. These malignancies obviously have multi-factorial risk elements that are either environmental or stem from lifestyle behaviour (smoking) or oncogenic viruses. Some features remain common, with generally aggressive behaviour, and the optimal treatment protocols are not therefore adhered to and drug–drug interactions must be a concern. Many
Conflict of interest statement
Authors have no conflict of interest statement, disclosing any financial or personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this work.
Reviewers
Prof. Umberto Tirelli, National Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Via Franco Gallini 2, I-33081 Aviano (PN), Italy.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Maryse Berlion for editing the English.
Dr. Nicolas Mounier M.D., Ph.D. is professor of Medical Oncology in Nice. He graduated in hospital St Louis, Paris. His mentors were Prof. C. Gisselbrecht and Prof. E. Lepage. Most of his work focuses on diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas in collaboration with the GELA (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adultes). At the present time, within the HIV framework, he particularly studies the impact of dose-intensity on tumor response assessed by PET imaging.
References (77)
- et al.
Spectrum of AIDS-associated malignant disorders
Lancet
(1998) - et al.
Management of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma
Lancet Oncol
(2007) - et al.
Polymorphisms of metabolizing enzymes and transporter proteins involved in the clearance of anticancer agents
Ann Oncol
(2001) - et al.
Highly effective treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related lymphoma with doseadjusted EPOCH: impact of antiretroviral therapy suspension and tumor biology
Blood
(2003) - et al.
Rituximab does not improve clinical outcome in a randomized phase 3 trial of CHOP with or without rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma: AIDS Malignancies Consortium Trial 010
Blood
(2005) - et al.
BEACOPP therapeutic regimen for patients with Hodgkin's disease and HIV infection
Ann Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Relationship between cytochrome 3A activity, inflammatory status and the risk of docetaxel-induced febrile neutropenia: a prospective study
Ann Oncol
(2007) - et al.
Role of human liver microsomal CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 in catalyzing N-dechloroethylation of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide
Biochem Pharmacol
(2000) - et al.
Protease inhibitors potentiate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
Blood
(2004) - et al.
Pharmacogenetics of irinotecan metabolism and transport: an update
Toxicol In Vitro
(2006)
Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Ann Oncol
Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamics relationships of imatinib (Glivec)
Therapie
AIDS and non-AIDS-related malignancies: a new vexing challenge in HIV-positive patients. Part I. Kaposi's sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma
Eur J Intern Med
AIDS and non-AIDS-related malignancies: a new vexing challenge in HIV-positive patients. Part II. Cervical and anal squamous epithelial lesions, lung cancer, testicular germ cell cancers, and skin cancers
Eur J Intern Med
Risk of other cancers following Kaposi's sarcoma: relation to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Am J Epidemiol
Trends in cancer risk among people with AIDS in the United States 1980–2002
AIDS
Malignancy-related causes of death in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy
Cancer
Cancer risk in the Swiss HIV cohort study: associations with immunodeficiency, smoking, and highly active antiretroviral therapy
J Natl Cancer Inst
Incidence of non-AIDS-defining cancers before and during the highly active antiretroviral therapy era in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients
J Clin Oncol
Cancer risk and mortality for patients with HIV in the combination antiretroviral therapy era: evolving epidemiology
J Clin Oncol
The growing problem of non-AIDS-defining malignancies in HIV
Curr Opin Oncol
Immunodeficiency and risk of AIDS-defining and non-AIDS-defining cancers: ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort, 1998 to 2006
Survival after cancer diagnosis in persons with AIDS
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr
Modern management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in HIV-infected patients
Br J Haematol
Pharmacokinetics and potential interactions amongst antiretroviral agents used to treat patients with HIV infection
Clin Pharmacokinet
Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: results of a randomized phase III clinical trial
J Clin Oncol
Randomized comparative trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus bleomycin and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. International Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Study Group
J Clin Oncol
Randomized phase III trial of liposomal daunorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma
J Clin Oncol
Paclitaxel is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma
J Clin Oncol
Phase II trial with dose titration of paclitaxel for the therapy of human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi's sarcoma
J Clin Oncol
Concomitant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy plus highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Cancer
Phase II trial of CHOP plus rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
J Clin Oncol
Drug interactions associated with HAART: focus on treatments for addiction and recreational drugs
AIDS Read
Drug interactions in cancer therapy
Nat Rev Cancer
Interactions between antiretrovirals and antineoplastic drug therapy
Clin Pharmacokinet
Taxol metabolism by human liver microsomes: identification of cytochrome P450 isozymes involved in its biotransformation
Cancer Res
Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of paclitaxel in patients with hepatic dysfunction: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9264
J Clin Oncol
Cited by (63)
GESIDA/National AIDS Plan: Consensus document on antiretroviral therapy in adults infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (Updated January 2015)
2015, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia ClinicaInhibition of HIV-1 entry by the tricyclic coumarin GUT-70 through the modification of membrane fluidity
2015, Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsCitation Excerpt :However, malignant lymphoma is still a severe and frequent complication in HIV-1-infected patients [33,34]. AIDS-related lymphoma has an extremely aggressive clinical course [35,36] and most anti-tumor reagents have drug–drug interactions with anti-HIV-1 reagents [37], leading to difficulties in the treatment of AIDS-related lymphoma. Since GUT-70 has anti-lymphoma and leukemia activities [10,11] in addition to its anti-HIV-1 effects, it is expected to be applied as a key drug in the prevention and treatment of related malignancies.
Navigating the Nexus: HIV and Breast Cancer—A Critical Review
2024, International Journal of Molecular SciencesNew treatment strategies for HIV-positive cancer patients undergoing anticancer medical treatment: update of the literature
2023, European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
Dr. Nicolas Mounier M.D., Ph.D. is professor of Medical Oncology in Nice. He graduated in hospital St Louis, Paris. His mentors were Prof. C. Gisselbrecht and Prof. E. Lepage. Most of his work focuses on diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas in collaboration with the GELA (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adultes). At the present time, within the HIV framework, he particularly studies the impact of dose-intensity on tumor response assessed by PET imaging.
- ☆
Part of this study was presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1–5 June 2007, Chicago, USA.
- 1
On behalf of the Onco-VIH consortium; http://www.ccde.fr.