Explaining delusions of control: The comparator model 20 years on

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.06.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Over the last 20 years the comparator model for delusions of control has received considerable support in terms of empirical studies. However, the original version clearly needs to be replaced by a model with a much greater degree of sophistication and specificity. Future developments are likely to involve the specification of the role of dopamine in the model and a generalisation of its explanatory power to the whole range of positive symptoms. However, we will still need to explain why symptoms can be so variable and we still do not understand the origin of the most mysterious symptom of all: thought insertion.

Highlights

► Delusions of control are associated with problems in predicting the consequences of action. ► Similar failures of prediction might explain other positive symptoms of schizophrenia. ► There is a role for dopamine in the response to prediction errors. ► New paradigms are needed so that we can study thoughts as well as actions.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (129)

  • The sense of agency for brain disorders: A comprehensive review and proposed framework

    2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    The authors speculated that this “hyper-binding” effect in schizophrenia was due to impairments in predicting the consequences of self-initiated actions. Indeed, future work supported this claim, describing either an impaired or absent forward model of motor control (Frith, 2012). Accordingly, one study found significant cortical thinning in the SMA of schizophrenic patients (Massey et al., 2017).

  • Reduced TMS-evoked fast oscillations in the motor cortex predict the severity of positive symptoms in first-episode psychosis

    2021, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
    Citation Excerpt :

    CDs represent the putative neural mechanism responsible for distinguishing between environmental and self-generated stimuli (so-called “self-monitoring”) (Ford and Mathalon, 2019). In psychosis, disturbances in CDs are hypothesized to underlie the false attribution to the outer world of internally generated percepts and thoughts, which could explain symptoms, including hallucinations, delusions (Feinberg, 1978; Frith, 1987; Frith, 2012), and self-disorders (Nelson et al., 2014). Intriguingly, in our patients' group, we reported an association between the reduced intrinsic ability of the motor area to generate beta-2 frontal oscillations, assessed by TMS-EEG, and the severity of positive symptoms (Fig. 3).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This article is part of a special issue of this journal on Beyond the Comparator Model.

View full text