Reusing ceramic wastes in concrete
Introduction
In Europe the amount of wastes in the different production stages of the ceramic industry reaches some 3–7% of its global production meaning millions of tons of calcined-clays per year that are just land filled [1]. With increasing restrictions on landfills in European Union area, the cost of deposition will increase and the industries will have to find ways for reusing their wastes. Although the reutilization of ceramic wastes has been practiced, the amount of wastes reused in that way is still negligible. Hence, the need for its application in other industries is becoming absolutely vital. Construction industry as the end user of almost all the ceramic materials is well posed to solve this environmental problem which is partially its own. The nature of construction industry, especially the concrete industry, is such that ceramic wastes can be used safely with no need for dramatic change in production and application process. On one hand, the cost of deposition of ceramic waste in landfill will be saved and, on the other, raw materials and natural resources will be replaced, thus saving energy and protecting the environment. According to some authors the best way for the construction industry to become a more sustainable one is by using wastes from other industries as building materials [2], [3]. The production of cement requires high energy input (850 kcal per kg of clinker) and implies the extraction of large quantities of raw materials from the earth (1.7 tonnes of rock to produce 1 tonne of clinker). On the other hand the production of one tonne of cement generates 0.55 tonnes of chemical CO2 and requires an additional 0.39 tonnes of CO2 in fuel emissions, accounting for a total of 0.94 tonnes of CO2 [4]. Therefore, the replacement of cement in concrete by ceramic wastes represents a tremendous saving of energy and has important environmental benefits. Besides, it will also have a major effect on decreasing concrete costs, since the cost of cement represents more than 45% of the concrete cost. Several authors already confirmed the pozzolanic reactivity of ceramic waste powder [5], [6], [7], nevertheless, research carried out so far are scarce and do not evaluate concrete durability performance which is a key issue. The same could be said about investigations concerning the use of ceramic aggregates in concrete [8], [9]. Consequently the aim of this research project is the assessment of strength and durability of ceramic wastes based concrete.
Section snippets
Materials and concrete mix design
Ceramic wastes can be separated in two categories in accordance with the source of raw materials. The first one are all fired wastes generated by the structural ceramic factories that use only red pastes to manufacture their products, such as brick, blocks and roof tiles. The second one is all fired waste produced in stoneware ceramic such as wall, floor tiles and sanitary ware. These producers use red and white pastes, nevertheless, the usage of white paste is more frequent and much higher in
Compressive strength
The results obtained indicate, as expected, large differences in early curing ages and smaller differences at long curing ages (Fig. 3). The concrete mixture with 20% of CB waste has the highest mechanical performance for all ceramic wastes which means it has the higher pozzolanic reactivity. The concrete mixture with WSOF wastes has the worst mechanical performance at early ages, representing 74.8% of control strength for 7 days curing. For 28 days curing that concrete mixture has almost 80% of
Conclusions
Results show that concrete with ceramic waste powder although has a minor strength loss possess increase durability performance because of its pozzolanic properties. Results also show that replacement of traditional sand by ceramic sand is a good option because it does not imply strength loss and has a superior durability performance. As for the replacement of traditional coarse aggregates by ceramic coarse aggregates, the results are promising but underperformed slightly in water absorption
References (21)
Industrially interesting approaches to low-CO2 cements
Cem Concr Res
(2004)- et al.
Ceramic wastes as alternative raw materials for Portland cement clinker production
Cement Concr Compos
(2008) - et al.
Use of waste brick as a partial replacement of cement in mortar
Waste Manage
(2009) - et al.
Characterization of ceramic roof tile wastes as pozzolanic admixture
Waste Manage
(2009) Effect of crushed ceramic and basaltic pumice as fine aggregates on concrete mortar properties
Construct Build Mater
(2007)Mechanical properties of brick aggregate concrete
Construct Build Mater
(2009)Properties of concrete incorporating fine recycled aggregate
Cem Concr Res
(2005)- et al.
Influence of physical and geometrical properties of granite and limestone aggregates on the durability of a C20/25 strength class concrete
Construct Build Mater
(2006) - et al.
Development of high-performance concrete having high resistance to chloride penetration
Nucl Eng Des
(2002) - et al.
Durability of concrete. Degradation phenomena involving detrimental chemical reactions
Cem Concr Res
(2008)
Cited by (387)
Using ceramic demolition wastes for CO<inf>2</inf>-reduced cement production
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsRed-mud additive geopolymer composites with eco-friendly aggregates
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsUtilization of Porcelain Polishing Residues and Metakaolin in Self-Consolidating Concrete
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsA comparative review on the utilisation of recycled waste glass, ceramic and rubber as fine aggregate on high performance concrete: Mechanical and durability properties
2024, Developments in the Built EnvironmentPozzolanic performance and characteristic analysis of binary blended cement incorporating ceramic polishing sludge
2024, Journal of Materials Research and Technology