Elsevier

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Volume 139, December 2015, Pages 295-301
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Sagittal alignment of the spine: What do you need to know?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.10.024Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sagittal analysis of the spine is not a deformity specific exercise.

  • Pelvic morphology is the foundation for spinal alignment.

  • SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers are established targets for spinal realignment.

  • Realignment procedures should respect age-adjusted alignment targets.

Abstract

Sagittal alignment, often misrepresented as sagittal balance, describes the ideal and “normal” alignment in the sagittal plane, resulting from the interplay between various organic factors. Any pathology that alters this equilibrium instigates sagittal malalignment and its compensatory mechanisms. As a result, sagittal malalignment is not limited to adult spinal deformity; its pervasiveness extends through most spinal disorders. While further research is developing, the literature reports clinically relevant radiographic parameters that have significant relationships with patient-reported outcomes. This article aims to provide a pragmatic review of sagittal plane analysis. At the end of this review, the reader should be able to analyze the sagittal plane of the spine, identify compensatory mechanisms, and choose patient-specific alignment targets.

Introduction

The human spine is a biomechanical masterpiece, enabling bipedalism through unique skeletal alterations and resulting in the “S-shape” spinal curvature. For instance, the lumbar curvature deliberately maintains the center of gravity over a narrow area between the feet, maximizing energy efficiency while minimizing the effect of gravity on joints, muscles, and ligaments.

Longstanding investigations on spinal evolution, function, and pathology have renewed a desire to study sagittal spino-pelvic alignment. Focused research has recently converted theoretical concepts into clinically relevant guidelines, establishing the role of sagittal alignment in treatment of various spectrums of spinal pathologies.

Sagittal alignment, often misrepresented as sagittal balance, describes the ideal and “normal” alignment in the sagittal plane, resulting from the interplay between various organic factors. Any pathology that alters this equilibrium instigates sagittal malalignment and its compensatory mechanisms. As a result, sagittal malalignment is not limited to adult spinal deformity; its pervasiveness extends through most spinal disorders. With this in consideration, sagittal malalignment is not a sole indication for surgery. However, the systematic assessment of sagittal plane is essential in evaluating the burden of spinal diseases on our patients.

This article aims to provide a pragmatic review of the most clinically relevant sagittal radiographic parameters in the literature. At the end of this review, the reader should be able to analyze the sagittal plane of the spine, identify compensatory mechanisms, and choose patient-specific alignment targets.

Section snippets

Pelvic to spine concept

The pelvis is the cornerstone of spinal sagittal alignment. Jean Dubousset's revolutionary concept that “the entire pelvis is a vertebra” triggered numerous investigations on the relationship between pelvic morphology and spinal sagittal alignment. Ginette Duval-Beaupere's work [1], [2] identified three geometrically interrelated pelvic parameters: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS); where PI = PT + SS.

Because of the limited mobility of the sacroiliac joint, pelvic

Sagittal alignment is not restricted to deformity patients

In line with the growing interest of analyzing the sagittal plane, there is another growing concern about the applicability of this analysis in daily practice, especially for clinicians who deal with non-deformity patients. However, the literature reports the pervasive involvement of sagittal alignment in numerous spinal pathologies, such as degenerative disc disease, osteoporosis, arthritis and low back pain. Respecting the sagittal plane is not restricted to major deformity procedures, but

Sagittal alignment targets: an update

Based on the tight relationship between sagittal plane deterioration and quality of life measures, Schwab et al. incorporated sagittal parameters into an adult spine deformity classification system and determined cutoff values for the most clinically relevant parameters in the sagittal profile (SVA, PI-LL, and PT) based upon multi-center data [46]. Ideally, Schwab recommends a SVA <40 mm, a PI-LL within 10° and a PT <20° as the targets for sagittal alignment. However, age-related changes occur

Conclusion

Sagittal malalignment plays a respectable role in multiple if not all spinal pathologies and therefore the benefit of analyzing sagittal alignment is not limited to deformity patients. While further research is developing, the literature thus far reports a direct relationship between sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcomes in various spinal pathologies, attesting to the benefit of sagittal alignment analysis. The simplicity and generalized applicability of the SRS-Schwab classification

References (47)

  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Fine-tuned surgical planning in adult spinal deformity: determining the lumbar lordosis necessary by accounting for both thoracic kyphosis and pelvic incidence

    Spine J.

    (2014)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Does one size fit all? Defining spinopelvic alignment thresholds based on age

    Spine J.

    (2014)
  • J. Legaye et al.

    Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves

    Eur. Spine J.

    (1998)
  • G. Duval-Beaupère et al.

    A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position

    Ann. Biomed. Eng.

    (1992)
  • P. Mangione et al.

    Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth

    Eur. Spine J.

    (1997)
  • R. Vialle et al.

    Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects

    J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.

    (2005)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2010)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2013)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Scoliosis Research Society – Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2012)
  • J. Cobb

    Outline for the study of scoliosis

    Instr. Course Lect. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. (Ann Arbor, Michigan)

    (1948)
  • P. Roussouly et al.

    Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2005)
  • M. Kozanek et al.

    Range of motion and orientation of the lumbar facet joints in vivo

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2009)
  • E.H. Boseker et al.

    Determination of “normal” thoracic kyphosis: a roentgenographic study of 121 “normal” children

    J. Pediatr. Orthop.

    (2000)
  • A. Faline et al.

    Morphological Study of the Lower Cervical Curvature: Results of 230 Asymptomatic Subjects

    (2007)
  • J.C. Le Huec et al.

    Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers

    Eur. Spine J.

    (2014)
  • J.C. Le Huec et al.

    Pelvic parameters: origin and significance

    Eur. Spine J.

    (2011)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2006)
  • V. Lafage et al.

    Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2008)
  • F. Schwab et al.

    Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2010)
  • F.J. Schwab et al.

    Surgical rates and operative outcome analysis in thoracolumbar and lumbar major adult scoliosis: application of the new adult deformity classification

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

    (2007)
  • J.A. Youssef et al.

    Current status of adult spinal deformity

    Glob. Spine J.

    (2013)
  • J. Terran et al.

    The SRS-schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort

    Neurosurgery

    (2013)
  • D. Nielsen et al.

    Clinical correlation of SRS-Schwab classification with HRQOL measures in a prospective non-US cohort of ASD patients

  • Cited by (161)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text