Original Article
Endoscopy
High-Definition Chromoendoscopy Superior to High-Definition White-Light Endoscopy in Surveillance of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in a Randomized Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.049Get rights and content

Background & Aims

There is debate over the optimal method for colonoscopic surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Guidelines recommend chromoendoscopy, but the value of chromoendoscopy in high-definition colonoscopy has not been proven. Furthermore, the value of random biopsies is controversial.

Methods

We performed a prospective study of 305 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s colitis referred for surveillance colonoscopy at a university hospital in Sweden, from March 2011 through April 2016. Patients randomly assigned to a group that received high-definition chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine (HD-CE; n = 152), collection of 32 random biopsies, and targeted biopsies or polypectomies or to a group that received high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE; n = 153), collection of 32 random biopsies, and targeted biopsies or polypectomies. The primary endpoint was number of patients with dysplastic lesions.

Results

Dysplastic lesions were detected in 17 patients with HD-CE and 7 patients with HD-WLE (P = .032). Dysplasias in random biopsies (n = 9760) were detected in 9 patients: 6 (3.9%) in the HD-CE group and 3 (2.0%) in the HD-WLE group (P = .72). Of the 9 patients with dysplasia, 3 patients (33%) had primary sclerosing cholangitis—only 18% of patients (54/305) included in the study had primary sclerosing cholangitis. The number of dysplastic lesions per 10 min of withdrawal time was 0.066 with HD-CE and 0.027 with HD-WLE (P = .056).

Conclusions

In a randomized trial, we found HD-CE with collection of random biopsies to be superior to HD-WLE with random biopsies for detection of dysplasia per colonoscopy. These results support the use of chromoendoscopy for surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01505842.

Section snippets

Methods

This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial compared WLE (HD-WLE group) and CE (HD-CE group) with HD colonoscopes and was performed at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden.

The study population comprised consecutive adult patients with IBD, referred for surveillance colonoscopy from March 2011 to April 2016. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were based on Swedish guidelines for IBD surveillance. The inclusion criteria were: (1) extensive ulcerative colitis or

Results

In total, 305 patients were included. Of these, 152 patients were randomized to HD-CE, and 153 to HD-WLE. In the per-protocol analysis, 42 (14%) patients were excluded (Figure 1, Supplementary File 2). The number of exclusions did not differ between the HD-CE and the HD-WLE-group (n = 20 vs 22; P = .76). There were no significant differences in patient-related characteristics, including risk factors for colorectal cancer (Table 1).

The characteristics of the macroscopic lesions are presented in

Discussion

In this randomized controlled trial including 305 patients, HD-CE was superior to HD-WLE in the detection of dysplasia in patients with long-standing IBD.

Previous research found that CE was superior to WLE in the detection of dysplasia in IBD when using standard resolution endoscopes.6,7 Our results support that this is also the case when using HD endoscopes. In 2 recent meta-analysis6,7 that included 3 randomized controlled studies,12, 13, 14, 15 HD-CE was compared with HD-WLE in subgroup

CRediT Authorship Contributions

Equal; Software: Lead; Validation: Equal; Visualization: Equal; Writing – original draft: Lead; Writing – review & editing: Equal)

Bjarki Alexandersson, (Data curation: Lead; Formal analysis: Lead; Methodology: Yousef Hamad, MD (Data curation: Supporting; Writing – review & editing: Supporting)

Anna Andreasson, PhD (Data curation: Supporting; Formal analysis: Supporting; Methodology: Supporting; Software: Supporting; Supervision: Supporting; Validation: Supporting; Visualization: Supporting;

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (33)

  • Managing Risk of Dysplasia and Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    2023, Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms and Management

    2022, Gastroenterology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Based on a pooled analysis, the prevalence of dysplasia identified on random biopsies only (“invisible dysplasia”) was 19.6% (range: 11.5%–31.2%) with SD-WLE, 9.8% (range: 6%–15%) with dye-based chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine (mix of SD-WLE and HD-WLE), and 9.4% (range: 4.1%–19.9%) with HD-WLE. Based on the same pooled analysis, fewer than 1%–1.5% of patients undergoing surveillance with HD-WLE or HD-chromoendoscopy would be misclassified as not having dysplasia if random biopsies were not obtained, although some studies report estimates as high as 6%.77,83 The randomized controlled trial that compared HD-WLE and HD-chromoendoscopy reported invisible dysplasia in only 3.9% vs 2.0% of patients, respectively; the vast majority of invisible dysplasia was LGD (89%; only 1 patient with HGD), and one-third of the patients with invisible dysplasia had concomitant PSC.

  • Surveillance and management of colorectal dysplasia and cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: Current practice and future perspectives

    2021, European Journal of Internal Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Non-inferiority in neoplasia detection was reported for surveillance with only targeted biopsies versus target and random biopsies in a RCT study, although no data on long-term outcomes were reported. [53] The yield of random biopsies is higher in patients with concomitant PSC (3.7% per-colonoscopy and 0.3% per biopsy), [51, 52, 54, 55] prior dysplasia, or a tubular colon. [52] The added value of random biopsies in these high-risk patients should be balanced against additional costs and potential risks, e.g. of surgical procedures.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding Supported by grants provided by the Stockholm County Council (ALF project).

View full text