Novel Algorithms for the Prophylaxis and Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndromes–Beyond Benzodiazepines

The prevalence and impact of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) are unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence, predictors, management, and clinical impact of AWS in patients hospitalized with AH.

A multinational, retrospective cohort study enrolling patients hospitalized with AH at 5 medical centres in Spain and in the USA was performed between January 1st, 2016 to January 31st, 2021. Data were retrospectively retrieved from electronic health records. Diagnosis of AWS was based on clinical criteria and use of sedatives to control AWS symptoms. The primary outcome was mortality. Multivariable models controlling for demographic variables and disease severity were performed to determine predictors of AWS (adjusted odds ratio [OR]) and the impact of AWS condition and management on clinical outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]).

In total, 432 patients were included. The median MELD score at admission was 21.9 (18.3–27.3). The overall prevalence of AWS was 32%. Lower platelet levels (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.05–2.48) and previous history of AWS (OR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.31–3.33) were associated with a higher rate of incident AWS, whereas the use of prophylaxis decreased the risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.36–0.93). The use of intravenous benzodiazepines (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64) and phenobarbital (HR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.07–8.37) for AWS treatment were independently associated with a higher mortality. The development of AWS increased the rate of infections (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.44–3.49), the need for mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.38–4.49), and ICU admission (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.19–3.23). Finally, AWS was associated with higher 28-day (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.40–3.82), 90-day (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.18–2.69), and 180-day mortality (HR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.06–2.24).

AWS commonly occurs in patients hospitalized with AH and complicates the hospitalization course. Routine prophylaxis is associated with a lower prevalence of AWS. Prospective studies should determine diagnostic criteria and prophylaxis regimens for AWS management in patients with AH.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

An interdisciplinary plenary session entitled “Rethinking and Rehashing Delirium” was held during the 2021 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry to facilitate dialog on the prevalent approach to delirium. Panel members included a psychiatrist, neurointensivist, and critical care specialist, and attendee comments were solicited with the goal of developing a statement. Discussion was focused on a reappraisal of delirium and, in particular, its disparate terminology and history in relation to acute encephalopathy. The authors endorse a recent joint position statement that describes acute encephalopathy as a rapidly evolving (<4 weeks) pathobiological brain process that presents as subsyndromal delirium, delirium, or coma and suggest the following points of refinement: (1) to suggest that “delirium disorder” describe the diagnostic construct including its syndrome, precipitant(s), and unique pathophysiology; (2) to restrict the term “delirium” to describing the clinical syndrome encountered at the bedside; (3) to clarify that the disfavored term “altered mental status” may occasionally be an appropriate preliminary designation where the diagnosis cannot yet be specified further; and (4) to provide rationale for rejecting the terms acute brain injury, failure, or dysfunction. The final common pathway of delirium appears to involve higher-level brain network dysfunction, but there are many insults that can disrupt functional connectivity. We propose that future delirium classification systems should seek to characterize the unique pathophysiological disturbances (“endotypes”) that underlie delirium and delirium's individual neuropsychiatric symptoms. We provide provisional means of classification in hopes that novel subtypes might lead to specific intervention to improve patient experience and outcomes. This paper concludes by considering future directions for the field. Key areas of opportunity include interdisciplinary initiatives to harmonize efforts across specialties and settings, enhance underrepresented groups in research, integration of delirium and encephalopathy in coding, development of relevant quality and safety measures, and exploration of opportunities for translational science.

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) encompasses a spectrum of diseases caused by excessive alcohol consumption. ALD includes hepatic steatosis, steatohepatitis, variable degrees of fibrosis, cirrhosis, and alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), the latter being the most severe acute form of the disease. Severe AH is associated with high mortality (reaching up to 30%–50%) at 90 days. The cornerstone of ALD, and particularly AH, treatment continues to be abstinence, accompanied by support measures such as nutritional supplementation and management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). In severe AH with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥21, corticosteroids can be used, especially MELD score between 25 and 39, where the highest benefit is achieved. Other key aspects of treatment include the early identification of infections and their associated management and the proper identification of potential candidates for liver transplantation. The development of new therapies based on the pathophysiology and mechanisms of liver injury are underway. This includes the modulation and management of the innate immune response, gut dysbiosis, bacterial translocation, and bacteria-derived products from the intestine. These hold promise for the future of AH treatment.

The current study describes, a novel combinatorial library of substituted fused pyrimido[3,2–e]pyrrolo[1,2-a]piperazine and pyrido[3,2-b]pyrrolo[1,2-d][1,4]diazepin heterocycles procured via utilization of suzuki coupling and acid amine coupling protocols. The synthesized compounds were screened for their in vitro cytotoxic activity over nine different cancer cell lines such as U-251, Panc-1, MCF-7, HepG2, DU-145, A549, 786-O, OVCAR3 and HCT-116 as well as on non-cancerous cell lines like normal human lung cell line WI38 and Mouse embryonic normal cell line NIH3T3 to evaluate safety profile of synthesized compounds. The bioassay results indicates that compound Cpd-J2 to be most potent among all the synthesized compounds towards ovary cancer cell lines (OVCAR-3) with promising activity value (EC₅₀: 6.3 μM) relative to standard doxorubicin (EC₅₀: 0.2 μM).

Seizures and epilepsy after traumatic brain injury (TBI) negatively affect quality of life and longevity. Antiseizure medication (ASM) prophylaxis after severe TBI is associated with improved outcomes; these medications are rarely used in mild TBI. However, a paucity of research is available to inform ASM use in complicated mild TBI (cmTBI) and no empirically based clinical care guidelines for ASM use in cmTBI exist. We aim to identify seizure prevention and management strategies used by clinicians experienced in treating patients with cmTBI to characterize standard care and inform a systematic approach to clinical decision making regarding ASM prophylaxis.

We recruited a multidisciplinary international cohort through professional organizational listservs and social media platforms. Our questionnaire assessed factors influencing ASM prophylaxis after cmTBI at the individual, institutional, and health system–wide levels.

Ninety-two providers with experience managing cmTBI completed the survey. We found a striking diversity of ASM use in cmTBI, with 30% of respondents reporting no/infrequent use and 42% reporting frequent use; these tendencies did not differ by provider or institutional characteristics. Certain conditions universally increased or decreased the likelihood of ASM use and represent consensus. Based on survey results, ASMs are commonly used in patients with cmTBI who experience acute secondary seizure or select positive neuroimaging findings; we advise caution in elderly patients and those with concomitant neuropsychiatric illness.

This study is the first to characterize factors influencing clinical decision making in ASM prophylaxis after cmTBI based on multidisciplinary multicenter provider practices. Prospective controlled studies are necessary to inform standardized guideline development.