Elsevier

Brain Stimulation

Volume 9, Issue 1, January–February 2016, Pages 78-85
Brain Stimulation

Beneficial Effects of Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation on Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.08.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Investigated bilateral STN-DBS motor, non-motor and quality of life effects in 60 patients with PD.

  • Significant improvement of quality of life, non-motor and motor symptoms on 6 months follow-up.

  • Significant non-motor benefit on sleep/fatigue, miscellaneous, perceptual problems, urinary domain.

Abstract

Background

STN-DBS is well established to improve motor symptoms and quality of life in patients with PD. While non-motor symptoms are crucial for quality of life in these patients, only neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological symptoms have been systematically studied in a longitudinal design so far. However, these are only a part of the non-motor symptoms spectrum.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that STN-DBS is associated with a beneficial effect on a range of non-motor symptoms.

Methods

In this multicenter, open, prospective, international study (EuroInf-study, UKCRN10084/DRKS00006735) we investigated non-motor effects of STN-DBS in “real-life” use. We evaluated Non-motor Symptom Scale, and Questionnaire, PD Questionnaire-8, Scales for Outcomes of PD motor examination and complications, and activities of daily living preoperatively and at 6 months follow-up in 60 consecutive patients (35 male, mean age: 61.6 ± 7.8 years, mean disease duration: 10.4 ± 4.2 years).

Results

All outcomes improved significantly at 6 months follow-up (PD Questionaire-8, p = 0.006; activities of daily living, p = 0.012; all others, p < 0.001; Wilcoxon signed-rank, respectively paired t-test; Bonferroni-correction). Post-hoc analyses of Non-motor Symptom Scale domains showed a significant reduction of sleep/fatigue and miscellaneous domains (p ≤ 0.001), perceptual problems/hallucinations (p = 0.036), and urinary (p = 0.018) scores. Effect sizes were “moderate” for Non-motor Symptom Scale, and motor complications, “large” for motor examination, and “small” for other outcomes.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that bilateral STN-DBS improves non-motor burden in patients with PD and opens the door to a more balanced evaluation of DBS outcomes. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and compare DBS non-motor effects to other invasive therapies of advanced PD.

Introduction

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is well established for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) improving motor symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), and quality of life (QoL) [1], [2], [3]. Non-motor symptoms (NMS) play a crucial role for QoL in patients with PD [4], [5]. Long-term effects of DBS on neuropsychological [6], [7] and neuropsychiatric symptoms [8], [9] have been studied. However, these symptoms contribute only to a part of NMS in patients with PD. Previously published studies on a wider range of NMS have methodological limitations due to a lack of objective clinician-based [10], patient-based [11], [12] or any validated assessment at all [12], and small cohort sizes of only 10 [13], [14] or 11 subjects followed up on 6 month [12].

In this study, we therefore investigated prospective data using validated non-motor clinician-based and self-assessment outcome measures collected on 6 months follow-up (6MFU) of a multicenter registry trial. We hypothesized that STN-DBS is associated with a reduction of NMS burden in patients with PD.

Furthermore, to investigate the relationship between changes of NMS, motor and QoL outcomes from baseline, an exploratory aim of our study was to analyze their correlation.

Section snippets

Design

This was a multicenter, open, prospective, European registry study (Cologne, London, and Manchester) of a subgroup of the “Non Motor Symptoms study group” of the “International Parkinson's disease and Movement Disorders Society” with a longitudinal follow-up (EuroInf-study). The “Non Motor Symptoms study group” has previously published results of two other arms of the EuroInf-study (subcutaneous apomorphine and intrajejunal levodopa infusion therapies) [15].

For the third arm, centers were

Results

Here we present data of 60 consecutive patients (35 male) aged 61.64 years (±7.84) with long histories of PD (10.45 ± 4.22 years) and moderate to high LEDD (1073.55 ± 475.93) at baseline. The median Hoehn & Yahr score was 2.75 (interquartile range: 2–3).

The assumption of normal distribution was violated for PDQ-8 Summary Index (p = 0.015), and SPES/SCOPA motor examination (p = 0.019), ADL (p = 0.006) and motor complications scores (p = 0.006), but not for NMSS total score (p = 0.066), and NMSQ

Discussion

This multicenter, open label European study provides evidence that bilateral STN-DBS improves NMS burden in patients with PD as has been suggested from single-center studies in small cohorts. Also, in accordance to previous studies investigating changes from baseline to 6MFU, in our cohort STN-DBS significantly improved motor outcomes and QoL [1], [32]. Studies investigating changes of motor examination from baseline MedON to 6MFU MedON/StimON report comparable results for motor examination

Conclusions

To conclude, STN-DBS ameliorates NMS burden in a range of aspects of NMS. In our cohort around 40% of patients treated with DBS improved their NMS. Number needed to treat results was consistent with relative change and effect size results for all outcome parameters. Reports of these parameters are needed to better understand responses to different treatment strategies like, e.g., DBS, conventional pharmacotherapy, and subcutaneous apomorphine and intrajejunal levodopa infusion therapies.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to patients for their consent and cooperation in this study.

References (53)

  • K.A. Follett et al.

    Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • F.M. Weaver et al.

    Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • P. Martinez-Martin et al.

    The impact of non-motor symptoms on health-related quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease

    Mov Disord

    (2011)
  • P. Barone et al.

    The PRIAMO study: a multicenter assessment of nonmotor symptoms and their impact on quality of life in Parkinson's disease

    Mov Disord

    (2009)
  • A.M. Frankemolle et al.

    Reversing cognitive-motor impairments in Parkinson's disease patients using a computational modelling approach to deep brain stimulation programming

    Brain

    (2010)
  • M. Jahanshahi et al.

    The impact of deep brain stimulation on executive function in Parkinson's disease

    Brain

    (2000)
  • L. Castelli et al.

    Chronic deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease: effects on cognition, mood, anxiety and personality traits

    Eur Neurol

    (2006)
  • R.G. Cury et al.

    Effects of deep brain stimulation on pain and other nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson disease

    Neurology

    (2014)
  • N. Hwynn et al.

    Effect of deep brain stimulation on Parkinson's nonmotor symptoms following unilateral DBS: a pilot study

    Parkinsons Dis

    (2011)
  • P. Martinez-Martin et al.

    EuroInf: a multicenter comparative observational study of apomorphine and levodopa infusion in Parkinson's disease

    Mov Disord

    (2014)
  • A.J. Hughes et al.

    Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • P. Martinez-Martin et al.

    Chronic subcutaneous infusion therapy with apomorphine in advanced Parkinson's disease compared to conventional therapy: a real life study of non motor effect

    J Parkinsons Dis

    (2011)
  • P. Reddy et al.

    Intrajejunal levodopa versus conventional therapy in Parkinson disease: motor and nonmotor effects

    Clin Neuropharmacol

    (2012)
  • K.R. Chaudhuri et al.

    The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson's disease: results from an international pilot study

    Mov Disord

    (2007)
  • K.R. Chaudhuri et al.

    International multicenter pilot study of the first comprehensive self-completed nonmotor symptoms questionnaire for Parkinson's disease: the NMSQuest study

    Mov Disord

    (2006)
  • J. Marinus et al.

    A short scale for the assessment of motor impairments and disabilities in Parkinson's disease: the SPES/SCOPA

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Utility of Postoperative Imaging Software for Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting in Patients with Movement Disorders

      2022, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for different movement disorders when they are refractory to medical treatment, including Parkinson disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and dystonia.1 Subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS has been shown to be effective in improving both motor and nonmotor symptoms, and the quality-of-life (QoL) of PD patients.2-5 Thalamic DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is effective in achieving symptomatic control of the tremor associated with different movement disorders.6,7

    • Deep brain stimulation effects on lower urinary tract function: Systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Out of these 29 studies, 9 reported on urodynamic parameters in DBS ON versus DBS OFF and were used for the quantitative analysis. Of the 29 included studies, 25 were prospective cohort studies [9,14–37], two were retrospective cohort studies [38,39], and two were case reports [40,41]. Overall, the 29 included studies enrolled a total of 1293 patients: 429 women (33%), 805 men (62%), and 59 patients (5%) for whom the gender was not reported.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding sources for study: This paper presents independent research funded by the German Research Foundation (Clinical Research Group 219), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. Additionally an unrestricted peer reviewed educational grant was provided to support coordination of the UK dataset from Medtronic. This study was supported by the Koeln Fortune Program.

    View full text