Elsevier

Brain Stimulation

Volume 1, Issue 2, April 2008, Pages 71-83
Brain Stimulation

Original research
Effects of pulse width and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.03.001Get rights and content

Background

Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in major depression is effective, cognitive effects limit its use. Reducing the width of the electrical pulse and by using the right unilateral electrode placement may decrease adverse cognitive effects, while preserving efficacy.

Methods

In a double-masked study, we randomly assigned 90 depressed patients to right unilateral ECT at 6 times seizure threshold or bilateral ECT at 2.5 times seizure threshold, using either a traditional brief pulse (1.5 milliseconds) or an ultrabrief pulse (0.3 millisecond). Depressive symptoms and cognition were assessed before, during, and immediately, 2, and 6 months after therapy. Patients who responded were monitored for a 1-year period.

Results

The final remission rate for ultrabrief bilateral ECT was 35%, compared with 73% for ultrabrief unilateral ECT, 65% for standard pulse width bilateral ECT, and 59% for standard pulse width unilateral ECT (all P < .05 after covariate adjustment). The ultrabrief right unilateral group had less severe cognitive side effects than the other three groups in virtually all primary outcome measures assessed in the acute postictal period, and during and immediately after therapy. Both the ultrabrief stimulus and right unilateral electrode placement produced less short- and long-term retrograde amnesia. Patients rated their memory deficits as less severe after ultrabrief right unilateral ECT compared with each of the other three conditions (P < .001).

Conclusions

The use of an ultrabrief stimulus markedly reduces adverse cognitive effects, and when coupled with markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT, also preserves efficacy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00487500.)

Section snippets

General description

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-masked trial contrasting four forms of ECT in 90 patients with major depression. All were inpatients at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, whose Institutional Review Board approved the study. An independent data and safety monitoring board monitored the safety of the study.

The first author (H.A.S.), who is also the senior scientist, designed the study in conjunction with the coauthors. Patient enrollment and data collection were supervised

Patient characteristics and treatment parameters

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the treatment groups were comparable (P > .05 for each comparison), except for a higher representation of psychotic depression in the ultrabrief pulse groups (Table 1). The doses of methohexital and succinylcholine and the measures of seizure duration were also comparable (Table 2). Replicating previous findings,5, 11, 19 initial seizure threshold was higher in the patients treated with BL compared with RUL ECT. However, pulse width exerted a larger

Discussion

This study demonstrated that the use of an ultrabrief pulse in ECT results in more efficient electrical stimulation than a traditional brief pulse. Further, ultrabrief pulse stimulation markedly reduces the acute, short-term, and long-term adverse cognitive effects of the treatment. This study confirmed that at high dosage relative to seizure threshold, RUL ECT administered with a traditional brief pulse does not differ in efficacy compared with a form of high-dosage bilateral ECT, but retains

References (41)

  • R.D. Weiner et al.

    Effects of stimulus parameters on cognitive side effects

    Ann NY Acad Sci

    (1986)
  • L. Geddes

    Optimal stimulus duration for extracranial cortical stimulation

    Neurosurgery

    (1987)
  • L. Squire et al.

    ECT and memory: brief pulse versus sine wave

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1986)
  • H.A. Sackeim et al.

    Effects of stimulus intensity and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • H.A. Sackeim et al.

    Effects of electrode placement on the efficacy of titrated, low-dose ECT

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • W.V. McCall et al.

    Titrated moderately suprathreshold vs fixed high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: acute antidepressant and cognitive effects

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • A. Stoppe et al.

    Fixed high-dose electroconvulsive therapy in the elderly with depression: a double-blind, randomized comparison of efficacy and tolerability between unilateral and bilateral electrode placement

    J ECT

    (2006)
  • R.L. Spitzer et al.

    Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1978)
  • M.B. First et al.

    Structured clinical interview for axis I DSM-IV disorders—patient dition (with psychotic ccreen) (SCID-I/P)

    (1996)
  • M. Hamilton

    Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness

    Br J Soc Clin Psychol

    (1967)
  • Cited by (411)

    • Memory disorders during electroconvulsive therapy

      2024, Annales Medico-Psychologiques
    • Correlates of electroconvulsive therapy with neurocognitive functioning, subjective memory and depression

      2022, Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      al. found that compared to sine wave technology, brief pulse technology correlated with relatively decreased subjective memory complaints over the course of ECT (Prudic et al., 2000). Further studies using ultrabrief pulse widths have shown less post-ictal impairment as well as fewer cognitive side effects over multiple domains, including global cognition, anterograde learning/recall, retrograde memory, delayed recall, and verbal fluency (Sackheim et al., 2008; Tor et al., 2015). Compared to bilateral placement of electrodes, unilateral placement has been associated with decreased post-ictal confusion and cognitive impairment immediately after treatments and may be associated with decreased anterograde amnesia at more distant time points (Lisanby et al., 2000; Prudic, 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported in part by grants R01 MH35636 and R01 MH47739 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

    Dr. Sackeim serves as an unpaid consultant to the MECTA Corporation, which donated the electroconvulsive therapy devices used in this study.

    View full text