Elsevier

Behaviour Research and Therapy

Volume 86, November 2016, Pages 95-104
Behaviour Research and Therapy

Can network analysis transform psychopathology?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Latent variable approaches to mental disorder are conceptually flawed.

  • Network analysis views disorders as causal systems of interacting symptoms.

  • Network analysis has clinical implications.

Abstract

Experimental psychopathology has been the primary path to gaining causal knowledge about variables maintaining mental disorders. Yet a radically different approach to conceptualizing psychopathology promises to advance our understanding, thereby complementing traditional laboratory experiments. In contrast to viewing symptoms as reflective of underlying, latent categories or dimensions, network analysis conceptualizes symptoms as constitutive of mental disorders, not reflective of them. Disorders emerge from the causal interactions among symptoms themselves, and intervening on central symptoms in disorder networks promises to foster rapid recovery. One purpose of this article is to contrast network analysis with traditional approaches, and consider its strengths and limitations. A second purpose is to review novel computational methods that may enable researchers to discern the causal structure of disorders (e.g., Bayesian networks). I close by sketching exciting new developments in methods that have direct implications for treatment.

Section snippets

Can network analysis transform psychopathology?

Three years ago the American Psychiatric Association (APA) released the fifth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; APA, 2013) amidst a storm of controversy. Immediately prior to the unveiling of the new manual, the director of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) announced that the DSM would no longer furnish the requisite framework for grant proposals submitted to NIMH (Insel, 2013). The institute, he said, would be “re-orienting its research

The network approach to psychopathology

The psychometrician, Denny Borsboom, and his colleagues have proposed a radically different explanation for syndromic coherence (e.g., Borsboom and Cramer, 2013, Borsboom, 2008, Borsboom et al., 2011a, Borsboom et al., 2011b, Cramer et al., 2010a, Schmittmann et al., 2013). According to their network1

Key concepts in network analysis

Networks consist of nodes and edges. Nodes represent the objects of study, and edges represent the connections between them. In psychopathology networks, nodes represent symptoms, and edges represent associations between symptoms.

Networks can consist of either weighted edges or unweighted edges. An unweighted edge merely signifies that two symptoms are connected, whereas a weighted edge signifies the magnitude of the connection (e.g., a Pearson correlation coefficient), represented by thickness

Node centrality metrics

Traditional categorical approaches to psychiatric diagnosis emphasize hallmark symptoms that are strongly associated with a single disorder, but seldom associated with other disorders. Some nosologists have proposed that we purify diagnostic criteria sets of nonspecific symptoms appearing in many disorders, leaving only those strongly associated with the syndrome (e.g., Spitzer, First, & Wakefield, 2007). This recommendation was especially an issue for specialists struggling to make sense of

Types of networks

Psychopathologists have computed several types of networks, most concerning cross-sectional, observational symptom data. Although cross-sectional data cannot alone confirm causality among symptoms, network analysts have devised methods that can bring us closer to characterizing mental disorders as causal systems (McNally, 2012).

Strengths and limitations of network analysis?

A potentially fatal objection to latent variable approaches to psychopathology, whether construed categorically or dimensionally, is their failure to satisfy the axiom of local independence requisite for justifying an inference to an underlying entity as the common cause of symptom emergence and covariance (Borsboom and Cramer, 2013, Borsboom, 2008). Indeed, it seems obvious that causal connections abound between symptoms (e.g., sleep loss causing fatigue; phobic fear causing avoidance

Future directions

The aim of research in abnormal psychology is to discover the causes of mental health problems, thereby enhancing the efficacy of prevention and treatment. The field of experimental psychopathology remains at the forefront of these efforts (van den Hout, Engelhard, & McNally, in press). However, for obvious ethical reasons, many questions concerning causality are unanswerable with experimental methods. Complementing experimental approaches, network analysis aims to elucidate the causal

References (86)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2013)
  • M.C. Ashton et al.

    On models of personality structure

    European Journal of Personality

    (2012)
  • K. Bollen et al.

    Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1991)
  • C.D. van Borkulo et al.

    Association of symptom network structure with the course of longitudinal depression

    JAMA Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • D. Borsboom

    Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems

    Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (2008)
  • D. Borsboom et al.

    Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology

    Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

    (2013)
  • D. Borsboom et al.

    The small world of psychopathology

    PLoS ONE

    (2011)
  • D. Borsboom et al.

    Why g is not an adaptation: A comment on Kanazawa (2004)

    Psychological Review

    (2006)
  • D. Borsboom et al.

    Transdiagnostic networks: Commentary on Nolen-Hoeksema and Watkins (2011)

    Perspectives on Psychological Science

    (2011)
  • D. Borsboom et al.

    The two disciplines of psychology, or: The disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis

  • D. Borsboom et al.

    The theoretical status of latent variables

    Psychological Review

    (2003)
  • L. Boschloo et al.

    The network structure of psychopathology in a community sample of preadolescents

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (2016, March)
  • L. Boschloo et al.

    A prospective study of how symptoms in a network predict the onset of depression

    Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

    (2016)
  • R. Boyd

    Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds

    Philosophical Studies

    (1991)
  • L.F. Bringmann et al.

    Revealing the dynamic network structure of the Beck Depression Inventory II

    Psychological Medicine

    (2015)
  • L.F. Bringmann et al.

    A network approach to psychopathology: New insights into clinical longitudinal data

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • A.O.J. Cramer et al.

    The pathoplasticity of dysphoric episodes: Differential impact of stressful life events on the pattern of depressive symptom inter-correlations

    Psychological Medicine

    (2012)
  • A.O.J. Cramer et al.

    Measurable like temperature or mereological like flocking? On the nature of personality traits

    European Journal of Personality

    (2012)
  • A.O.J. Cramer et al.

    Comorbidity: A network perspective

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (2010)
  • A.O.J. Cramer et al.

    Complex realities require complex theories: Refining and extending the network approach to mental disorders

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (2010)
  • J.R. Edwards et al.

    On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures

    Psychological Methods

    (2000)
  • S. Epskamp et al.

    qgraph: Network visualization of relationships in psychometric data

    Journal of Statistical Software

    (2012)
  • A. Frances

    ICD, DSM and the Tower of Babel

    Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • A. Frances et al.

    ICD-11 should not repeat the mistakes made by DSM-5

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • E.I. Fried

    Problematic assumptions have slowed down depression research: Why symptoms, not syndromes are the way forward

    Frontiers in Psychology

    (2015)
  • E.I. Fried et al.

    From loss to loneliness: The relationship between bereavement and depressive symptoms

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (2015)
  • E.I. Fried et al.

    Commentary: “Consistent superiority of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors over placebo in reducing depressed mood in patients with major depression.”

    Frontiers in Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • J. Friedman et al.

    Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent

    Journal of Statistical Software

    (2010)
  • E.I. Fried et al.

    The impact of individual depressive symptoms on impairment of psychosocial functioning

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • E.I. Fried et al.

    Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: Individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors

    Psychological Medicine

    (2014)
  • T.M.J. Fruchterman et al.

    Graph drawing by force-directed placement

    Software - Practice and Experience

    (1991)
  • U. Grömping

    Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package relaimpo

    Journal of Statistical Software

    (2006)
  • Cited by (569)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    I thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful, excellent, and very helpful comments. The author has no funding sources to report.

    View full text