How eye movements affect unpleasant memories: Support for a working-memory account

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.04.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing can reduce ratings of the vividness and emotionality of unpleasant memories—hence it is commonly used to treat posttraumatic stress disorder. The present experiments compared three accounts of how eye movements produce these benefits. Participants rated unpleasant autobiographical memories before and after eye movements or an eyes stationary control condition. In Experiment 1, eye movements produced benefits only when memories were held in mind during the movements, and eye movements increased arousal, contrary to an investigatory-reflex account. In Experiment 2, horizontal and vertical eye movements produced equivalent benefits, contrary to an interhemispheric-communication account. In Experiment 3, two other distractor tasks (auditory shadowing, drawing) produced benefits that were negatively correlated with working-memory capacity. These findings support a working-memory account of the eye movement benefits in which the central executive is taxed when a person performs a distractor task while attempting to hold a memory in mind.

Introduction

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is a psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), an anxiety disorder that can develop after exposure to events that evoke intense fear, horror, or helplessness (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Since 1990, thousands of clinicians have been trained in the use of EMDR procedures (Cahill, Carrigan, & Frueh, 1999), and EMDR has become a more complex and integrative form of therapy (Shapiro (2001), Shapiro (2002)). The present work examined how one component of EMDR—eye movements—affects participants’ reactions to their memories of unpleasant events.

The current treatment manual for EMDR is Shapiro (2001). During EMDR, the therapist asks the client to hold a distressing memory in mind along with accompanying emotions and a negative cognition associated with the memory. The therapist concurrently provides some form of bilateral stimulation. Most commonly, horizontal eye movements are elicited by having the client follow a repetitive side-to-side motion of the therapist's index finger. A set of 20 or more eye movements is performed while the memory is held in mind. The client then reports current sensations, cognitions, and emotions. Sets are repeated until the client reports minimal distress associated with the memory. The therapist then guides the client to replace the negative cognition with a client-generated positive one. Alternate forms of bilateral stimulation such as vertical or diagonal eye movements (Shapiro, 2001), lightly tapping the client's hands (Shapiro, 2001), or auditory tones (EMDRIA, 2000; Servan-Schreiber, Schooler, Dew, Carter, & Bartone, 2006) can be used if horizontal eye movements are not effective.

Section snippets

The EMDR debate and how to address it

Seldom has a psychological treatment received such a widely divergent reaction from the scientific and professional community (Perkins & Rouanzoin, 2002). Strong claims about EMDR's clinical efficacy emerged relatively quickly and were challenged with similar verve (see Lohr, Lilienfeld, Tolin, & Herbert, 1999; Shapiro, 1996). On the one hand, EMDR is one of the most extensively researched psychological interventions for PTSD (Maxfield & Hyer, 2002; Shapiro, 2002). Meta-analyses of outcome

Accounts of eye movement benefits in EMDR

Several experiments with non-clinical populations have found that voluntary eye movements can make unpleasant images less vivid and emotional (e.g., Andrade & Baddeley, 1993; Merckelbach, Hogervorst, Kampman, & de Jongh, 1994; Muris & Merckelbach, 1999). Eye movements can also reduce the vividness and emotionality of unpleasant autobiographical memories, relative to both focusing on the memory alone and focusing on the memory while holding the eyes stationary (e.g., Andrade, Kavanagh, &

The present experiments

The goal of the present experiments was to compare these three accounts of how eye movements produce their beneficial effects. Participants remembered unpleasant autobiographical events and provided initial ratings of their vividness, emotionality, and a novel rating—completeness (e.g., Andrade et al., 1997; Barrowcliff et al., 2003; van den Hout et al., 2001). Clinicians have observed that traumatic memories often seem less complete during eye movements, such that details are lost, or the

Experiment 1

Experiment 1 compared the working-memory and investigatory-reflex accounts of the eye movement benefits. Shapiro (2001) noted that teasing these accounts apart may be challenging because they were designed to explain the same phenomena. However, the working-memory account predicts that eye movements should reduce vividness and emotionality only when eye movements and remembering coincide (Andrade et al., 1997; Van Den Hout et al., 2001). Only when the memory is in the VSSP should it be subject

Experiment 2

The working-memory and IHC accounts make different predictions about the effect of vertical eye movements on unpleasant memories. The IHC account proposes that IHC is the mechanism underlying the eye movement benefits. Vertical eye movements, which do not increase IHC, should thus be ineffective (e.g., Christman et al., 2003). In contrast, the working-memory account predicts that both horizontal and vertical eye movements should be effective because both should fill the VSSP. Although the

Experiment 3

Experiment 3 attempted to identify the locus of the eye movement benefits in the working-memory system. The VSSP account posits that disruption of memories occurs in the VSSP (Andrade et al., 1997; Kavanagh et al., 2001). This account accommodates earlier findings, including those of Experiments 1 and 2, because visuospatial tasks were always used in previous experiments (i.e., eye movements, tapping, passive visual interference). Participants can often perform simple visuospatial and verbal

General discussion

Consistent with a working-memory account, performing horizontal or vertical eye movements, an auditory shadowing task, or a drawing task while holding an unpleasant autobiographical memory in mind decreased ratings of the vividness, emotionality, and completeness of those memories relative to an eyes stationary control. More specifically, according to a central-executive working-memory account, the central-executive component of working memory was taxed by the competing demands of holding a

Conclusion

EMDR remains a controversial treatment. The present experiments allay some of this controversy by highlighting a theory-grounded explanation of eye movement benefits, namely, a working-memory account with a central-executive locus. That EMDR works does not mean that researchers and clinicians should not attempt to discover how it works. The present findings provide an impetus to further test the role that taxing the central executive plays in EMDR and other forms of psychotherapy.

Acknowledgments

This research formed part of RWG's Ph.D. dissertation conducted under GEB's supervision. It was supported by a postgraduate scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to RWG, and by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to GEB. We thank the members of RWG's exceptional dissertation committee; Rehman Mulji and Andreas Breuer for research assistance; Tavis Campbell for guidance on measuring physiological arousal;

References (99)

  • J.D. Herbert et al.

    Science and pseudoscience in the development of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Implications for clinical psychology

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (2000)
  • K.A. Johnstone et al.

    Attention to phobic stimuli during exposure: The effect of distraction on anxiety reduction, self-efficacy, and perceived control

    Behavior Research and Therapy

    (2004)
  • I. Kawachi et al.

    Decreased heart rate variability in men with phobic anxiety

    American Journal of Cardiology

    (1995)
  • J.M. Lohr et al.

    Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: An analysis of specific versus nonspecific treatment factors

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1999)
  • J.N. Marquis

    A report on seventy-eight cases treated by eye movement desensitization

    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • P. Muris et al.

    Traumatic memories, eye movements, phobia, and panic: A critical note on the proliferaton of EMDR

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1999)
  • F. Shapiro

    Eye movement desensitization: A new treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder

    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • F. Shapiro

    Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): Evaluation of controlled PTSD research

    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • P. Whitney et al.

    Measuring central executive functioning: What's in a reading span?

    Brain and Cognition

    (2001)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2000)
  • American Psychiatric Association (2004). Treating patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress...
  • Andrade, J., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Auditory and visual imagery: The role of working memory. In Paper presented at...
  • J. Andrade et al.

    Eye-movements and visual imagery: A working memory approach to the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder

    British Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (1997)
  • A.D. Baddeley

    Working memory

    (1986)
  • A.D. Baddeley et al.

    Working memory and the vividness of imagery

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (2000)
  • A.D. Baddeley et al.

    Imagery and visual working memory

  • A.D. Baddeley et al.

    Spatial working memory

  • P. Bakan et al.

    Resting EEG alpha asymmetry of reflective lateral eye movements

    Nature

    (1969)
  • A.L. Barrowcliff et al.

    Horizontal rhythmical eye movements consistently diminish the arousal provoked by auditory stimuli

    British Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (2003)
  • A.L. Barrowcliff et al.

    Eye-movements reduce the vividness, emotional valence and electrodermal arousal associated with negative autobiographical memories

    The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

    (2004)
  • J.I. Bisson et al.

    Psychological treatments for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • L.R. Brooks

    The suppression of visualization by reading

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1967)
  • D. Caplan et al.

    Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1996)
  • D.L. Chambless et al.

    Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2001)
  • S.D. Christman et al.

    Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories

    Neuropsychology

    (2003)
  • S.D. Christman et al.

    Superior episodic memory is associated with interhemispheric processing

    Neuropsychology

    (2001)
  • R.J. Compton et al.

    Effects of worry and evaluation stress on interhemispheric interaction

    Neuropsychology

    (2001)
  • A.R.A. Conway et al.

    Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide

    Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

    (2005)
  • N. Cowan et al.

    Two separate verbal processes contribute to short-term memory span

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (1998)
  • P.R. Davidson et al.

    Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): A meta-analysis

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2001)
  • EMDR International Association (2000). Principles and standards. Available...
  • R.W. Engle

    Working memory capacity as executive attention

    Current Directions in Psychological Science

    (2002)
  • R.W. Engle et al.

    Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (1999)
  • E.B. Foa et al.

    Emotional processing theory: An update

  • E.B. Foa et al.

    Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1986)
  • L.M. Grencavage et al.

    Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors?

    Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

    (1990)
  • S.C. Hayes

    Acceptance and commitment therapy and the new behavior therapies: Mindfulness, acceptance, and relationship

  • Cited by (255)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text