How eye movements affect unpleasant memories: Support for a working-memory account
Introduction
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is a psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), an anxiety disorder that can develop after exposure to events that evoke intense fear, horror, or helplessness (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Since 1990, thousands of clinicians have been trained in the use of EMDR procedures (Cahill, Carrigan, & Frueh, 1999), and EMDR has become a more complex and integrative form of therapy (Shapiro (2001), Shapiro (2002)). The present work examined how one component of EMDR—eye movements—affects participants’ reactions to their memories of unpleasant events.
The current treatment manual for EMDR is Shapiro (2001). During EMDR, the therapist asks the client to hold a distressing memory in mind along with accompanying emotions and a negative cognition associated with the memory. The therapist concurrently provides some form of bilateral stimulation. Most commonly, horizontal eye movements are elicited by having the client follow a repetitive side-to-side motion of the therapist's index finger. A set of 20 or more eye movements is performed while the memory is held in mind. The client then reports current sensations, cognitions, and emotions. Sets are repeated until the client reports minimal distress associated with the memory. The therapist then guides the client to replace the negative cognition with a client-generated positive one. Alternate forms of bilateral stimulation such as vertical or diagonal eye movements (Shapiro, 2001), lightly tapping the client's hands (Shapiro, 2001), or auditory tones (EMDRIA, 2000; Servan-Schreiber, Schooler, Dew, Carter, & Bartone, 2006) can be used if horizontal eye movements are not effective.
Section snippets
The EMDR debate and how to address it
Seldom has a psychological treatment received such a widely divergent reaction from the scientific and professional community (Perkins & Rouanzoin, 2002). Strong claims about EMDR's clinical efficacy emerged relatively quickly and were challenged with similar verve (see Lohr, Lilienfeld, Tolin, & Herbert, 1999; Shapiro, 1996). On the one hand, EMDR is one of the most extensively researched psychological interventions for PTSD (Maxfield & Hyer, 2002; Shapiro, 2002). Meta-analyses of outcome
Accounts of eye movement benefits in EMDR
Several experiments with non-clinical populations have found that voluntary eye movements can make unpleasant images less vivid and emotional (e.g., Andrade & Baddeley, 1993; Merckelbach, Hogervorst, Kampman, & de Jongh, 1994; Muris & Merckelbach, 1999). Eye movements can also reduce the vividness and emotionality of unpleasant autobiographical memories, relative to both focusing on the memory alone and focusing on the memory while holding the eyes stationary (e.g., Andrade, Kavanagh, &
The present experiments
The goal of the present experiments was to compare these three accounts of how eye movements produce their beneficial effects. Participants remembered unpleasant autobiographical events and provided initial ratings of their vividness, emotionality, and a novel rating—completeness (e.g., Andrade et al., 1997; Barrowcliff et al., 2003; van den Hout et al., 2001). Clinicians have observed that traumatic memories often seem less complete during eye movements, such that details are lost, or the
Experiment 1
Experiment 1 compared the working-memory and investigatory-reflex accounts of the eye movement benefits. Shapiro (2001) noted that teasing these accounts apart may be challenging because they were designed to explain the same phenomena. However, the working-memory account predicts that eye movements should reduce vividness and emotionality only when eye movements and remembering coincide (Andrade et al., 1997; Van Den Hout et al., 2001). Only when the memory is in the VSSP should it be subject
Experiment 2
The working-memory and IHC accounts make different predictions about the effect of vertical eye movements on unpleasant memories. The IHC account proposes that IHC is the mechanism underlying the eye movement benefits. Vertical eye movements, which do not increase IHC, should thus be ineffective (e.g., Christman et al., 2003). In contrast, the working-memory account predicts that both horizontal and vertical eye movements should be effective because both should fill the VSSP. Although the
Experiment 3
Experiment 3 attempted to identify the locus of the eye movement benefits in the working-memory system. The VSSP account posits that disruption of memories occurs in the VSSP (Andrade et al., 1997; Kavanagh et al., 2001). This account accommodates earlier findings, including those of Experiments 1 and 2, because visuospatial tasks were always used in previous experiments (i.e., eye movements, tapping, passive visual interference). Participants can often perform simple visuospatial and verbal
General discussion
Consistent with a working-memory account, performing horizontal or vertical eye movements, an auditory shadowing task, or a drawing task while holding an unpleasant autobiographical memory in mind decreased ratings of the vividness, emotionality, and completeness of those memories relative to an eyes stationary control. More specifically, according to a central-executive working-memory account, the central-executive component of working memory was taxed by the competing demands of holding a
Conclusion
EMDR remains a controversial treatment. The present experiments allay some of this controversy by highlighting a theory-grounded explanation of eye movement benefits, namely, a working-memory account with a central-executive locus. That EMDR works does not mean that researchers and clinicians should not attempt to discover how it works. The present findings provide an impetus to further test the role that taxing the central executive plays in EMDR and other forms of psychotherapy.
Acknowledgments
This research formed part of RWG's Ph.D. dissertation conducted under GEB's supervision. It was supported by a postgraduate scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to RWG, and by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to GEB. We thank the members of RWG's exceptional dissertation committee; Rehman Mulji and Andreas Breuer for research assistance; Tavis Campbell for guidance on measuring physiological arousal;
References (99)
- et al.
An orienting response model of eye movement desensitization
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1996) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2000)- et al.
Working memory
- et al.
Developmental increase in working memory span: Resource sharing or temporal decay?
Journal of Memory and Language
(2001) - et al.
Does EMDR work? And if so, why? A critical review of controlled outcome and dismantling research
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(1999) - et al.
Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm
Brain and Cognition
(2004) - et al.
Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2003) - et al.
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1980) - et al.
The relative efficacy and treatment distress of EMDR and a cognitive behavioral trauma treatment protocol in the amelioration of posttraumatic stress disorder
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(1999) A proposal for a conditioning model of eye movement desensitization treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1993)
Science and pseudoscience in the development of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Implications for clinical psychology
Clinical Psychology Review
Attention to phobic stimuli during exposure: The effect of distraction on anxiety reduction, self-efficacy, and perceived control
Behavior Research and Therapy
Decreased heart rate variability in men with phobic anxiety
American Journal of Cardiology
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: An analysis of specific versus nonspecific treatment factors
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
A report on seventy-eight cases treated by eye movement desensitization
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Traumatic memories, eye movements, phobia, and panic: A critical note on the proliferaton of EMDR
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Eye movement desensitization: A new treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): Evaluation of controlled PTSD research
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Measuring central executive functioning: What's in a reading span?
Brain and Cognition
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
Eye-movements and visual imagery: A working memory approach to the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Working memory
Working memory and the vividness of imagery
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Imagery and visual working memory
Spatial working memory
Resting EEG alpha asymmetry of reflective lateral eye movements
Nature
Horizontal rhythmical eye movements consistently diminish the arousal provoked by auditory stimuli
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Eye-movements reduce the vividness, emotional valence and electrodermal arousal associated with negative autobiographical memories
The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Psychological treatments for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis
British Journal of Psychiatry
The suppression of visualization by reading
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence
Annual Review of Psychology
Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories
Neuropsychology
Superior episodic memory is associated with interhemispheric processing
Neuropsychology
Effects of worry and evaluation stress on interhemispheric interaction
Neuropsychology
Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
Two separate verbal processes contribute to short-term memory span
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): A meta-analysis
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Working memory capacity as executive attention
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Emotional processing theory: An update
Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information
Psychological Bulletin
Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors?
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Acceptance and commitment therapy and the new behavior therapies: Mindfulness, acceptance, and relationship
Cited by (255)
Targeting negative flashforward imagery in speech anxiety with a visuospatial dual-task: Do attenuated flashforwards lead to less anxiety and avoidance?
2024, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryThe working mechanisms of imagery rescripting and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Findings from a randomised controlled trial
2024, Behaviour Research and TherapyThe effectiveness of two novel approaches to prevent intrusions: A pilot study comparing Tetris_dualtask and imagery rescripting to control
2024, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryCognitive flexibility moderates the efficacy of a visuospatial intervention following exposure to analog trauma
2023, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryBilateral eye movements disrupt the involuntary perceptual representation of trauma-related memories
2023, Behaviour Research and Therapy